You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why can't we physically reduce CO2 in the atmosphere? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
PeaceForever Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-04 10:40 AM
Original message
Why can't we physically reduce CO2 in the atmosphere?
Advertisements [?]
When I was in high school chemistry class, we learned a procedure in lab to convert carbon dioxide into oxygen and solid carbon.

Why can't this procedure be done on a grand scale? If we can reduce the carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere, it will ease global warming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Why can't we physically reduce CO2 in the atmosphere? PeaceForever  May-25-04 10:40 AM   #0 
  - Sure, but how much energy will it take?  e j e   May-25-04 10:42 AM   #1 
  - ...and will the...  slavkomae   May-25-04 10:43 AM   #2 
  - Good question  PeaceForever   May-25-04 10:44 AM   #3 
  - Can't do it cuz we have to keep knocking down trees to make way for roads  havocmom   May-25-04 10:45 AM   #4 
  - For the same reason we can't synthesize ozone  wtmusic   May-25-04 10:45 AM   #5 
  - Energy balance?  punpirate   May-25-04 10:47 AM   #6 
  - iron  jay-3d   May-25-04 10:52 AM   #7 
     - IIRC pilot studies did not produce the expected results....  mike_c   May-25-04 11:01 AM   #10 
     - Here's an article supporting that:  punpirate   May-25-04 11:09 AM   #11 
  - Lots of problems with this kind of thinking  yellowcanine   May-25-04 10:54 AM   #8 
  - there have been several proposals for physically removing...  mike_c   May-25-04 10:54 AM   #9 
  - by the way: this is an issue for many alternate energy plans  e j e   May-25-04 02:48 PM   #12 
  - hydrogen  factroid   May-25-04 03:47 PM   #14 
     - it might work, but details matter  e j e   May-25-04 04:08 PM   #15 
  - the simple solution  factroid   May-25-04 03:42 PM   #13 
  - This is dangerous territory because it appeals to perpetual motion  NNadir   May-25-04 07:55 PM   #16 
  - Bush cut the funding  Bdog   May-25-04 09:37 PM   #17 
  - 3rd Law of Thermodynamics  CabalPowered   May-30-04 04:15 PM   #18 
  - Third law of thermodynamics?  DrWeird   May-31-04 02:34 AM   #19 
  - Plant a tree.  DrWeird   May-31-04 02:36 AM   #20 
  - Good point doc. n/t  NNadir   May-31-04 11:21 AM   #21 
  - Yes, but I thought trees make only a tiny dent.  PeaceForever   Jun-01-04 06:27 PM   #23 
     - Interesting article... different answers than mine (see below)  AZCat   Jun-01-04 07:48 PM   #26 
  - I had a homework problem related to this a couple of years ago...  AZCat   Jun-01-04 04:40 PM   #22 
  - I'll be interested in the answers  PeaceForever   Jun-01-04 06:28 PM   #24 
  - Answers (fwiw)  AZCat   Jun-01-04 07:34 PM   #25 
     - These are reasonable values, and look acheivable on their face.  NNadir   Jun-01-04 07:56 PM   #27 
     - Yeah- Perkins thought of that  AZCat   Jun-01-04 08:08 PM   #28 
        - The problem with limestone is that one needs to make hydroxides as a  NNadir   Jun-01-04 09:11 PM   #29 
     - Joseph C. McNeil Generating Station Wood fuel facts  Bdog   Jun-02-04 07:13 PM   #31 
        - Well, it's safer than coal, but not safer than nuclear. Wood burning link  NNadir   Jun-02-04 07:39 PM   #32 
           - Nuke energy = risk minimized energy?  AZCat   Jun-03-04 01:13 AM   #33 
           - Wrong. Solar energy, except for wind, is not safer than nuclear.  NNadir   Jun-03-04 01:52 AM   #34 
              - I apologize - I was unclear  AZCat   Jun-03-04 07:52 AM   #36 
                 - You're right about that type of solar energy. It's very safe, and very  NNadir   Jun-03-04 08:32 PM   #37 
           - Its not 10% its 1% of federally mandated emission levels  Bdog   Jun-03-04 02:50 AM   #35 
              - To zero?  NNadir   Jun-04-04 12:07 AM   #38 
  - Better Ways to Do It  Pol   Jun-02-04 03:26 PM   #30 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC