kristopher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-10-11 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
| 34. The original point is unambiguously answered here, and you are wrong. |
|
Edited on Sat Dec-10-11 08:35 PM by kristopher
Draft Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (GNEP PEIS; DOE/EIS-0396), accomplished in Oct 2008 by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, Table 4.8-6 (p. 4-139).
Orginal point you said was not true.
• On a life-cycle basis, French-style reprocessing and recycle increases the volume of waste that would have to disposed of in a geologic repository. Reprocessing results in high-level radioactive waste and large volumes of Greater than Class C waste, both of which must be managed by deep geologic disposal. Their combined volume on a life-cycle basis is estimated to be about six times more than the no-reprocessing approach that is current U.S. policy, according to Department of Energy estimates. Low-level waste volume and waste transportation shipments are also estimated to increase several-fold.
|
| -3 Reasons to Avoid Nuclear Power |
kristopher |
Dec-09-11 09:28 PM |
#0 |
 -
three reasons to avoid nuclear power: |
niyad |
Dec-09-11 09:31 PM |
#1 |
  -
which are... |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 05:33 PM |
#15 |
| -
They make money for a few decades, but then they |
lob1 |
Dec-09-11 09:48 PM |
#2 |
| -
The point of this report by the Fool... |
Bob Wallace |
Dec-09-11 10:30 PM |
#3 |
| -
My point was that it's a bad investment, too. |
lob1 |
Dec-09-11 10:50 PM |
#4 |
| -
Not your call to make.... |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 05:26 PM |
#14 |
| -
Exelon does make money off nuclear... |
Bob Wallace |
Dec-10-11 07:42 PM |
#23 |
| -
Exelon CEO... |
Bob Wallace |
Dec-10-11 11:49 PM |
#69 |
| -
Not if you reprocess / recycle |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 02:48 PM |
#7 |
| -
Nope. |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 03:24 PM |
#9 |
| -
Just because anti-nukes say it doesn't make it true. |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 04:00 PM |
#11 |
| -
This is tiresome. You are making another assertion that you KNOW to be false. |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 05:44 PM |
#16 |
| -
You misinterpret |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 06:31 PM |
#18 |
| -
The table lays all of the alternatives out in the same column. |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 07:30 PM |
#20 |
| -
NOT FALSE |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 08:01 PM |
#27 |
| -
The original point is unambiguously answered here, and you are wrong. |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 08:22 PM |
#34 |
| -
FAULTY ERROR ERROR |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 08:39 PM |
#42 |
| -
Unfortunately.... |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 07:26 PM |
#19 |
| -
You can't worm your way out with the "baffle 'em with bullshit" tactic either. |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 07:33 PM |
#21 |
| -
NOPE!! |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 07:49 PM |
#25 |
| -
Tell that to the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy, it is their data. |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 08:04 PM |
#28 |
| -
I have no beef with DOE. Only your FAULTY interpretation |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 08:32 PM |
#37 |
| -
You ARE disputing the DOE data. |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 08:34 PM |
#39 |
| -
Tell us what Class C waste is.. |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 08:51 PM |
#46 |
| -
You are trying to create another straw man. |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 09:12 PM |
#50 |
| -
I note no enlightenment from you. |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 09:21 PM |
#52 |
| -
You underestimate our readership |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 08:05 PM |
#29 |
| -
You are arguing with DOE Pam - their data is unambiguous. |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 08:15 PM |
#31 |
| -
BAD INTERPRETATION |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 08:26 PM |
#35 |
| -
This is the claim you are disputing |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 08:31 PM |
#36 |
| -
I'm not disputing DOE - only saying YOU are WRONG!! |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 09:05 PM |
#48 |
| -
All this about... |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 10:03 PM |
#57 |
| -
FAULTY interpretation |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 07:41 PM |
#22 |
| -
Unlike you I have already given a complete reference pam. |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 07:48 PM |
#24 |
| -
Even the devil... |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 07:53 PM |
#26 |
| -
Tell that to the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy, it is their data. |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 08:08 PM |
#30 |
| -
I have no problem with DOE; only your FAULTY interpretation |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 08:17 PM |
#32 |
| -
It isn't subject to interpretation it is unambiguous |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 08:21 PM |
#33 |
| -
This is the assertion you said was an anti-nuclear falsehood |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 08:32 PM |
#38 |
| -
Kris - this is really quite simple |
FBaggins |
Dec-10-11 08:38 PM |
#40 |
| -
You're right, but your question is irrelevant to the discussion. |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 08:42 PM |
#43 |
| -
"Yes or no" cannot be substituted with "you're right" |
FBaggins |
Dec-10-11 08:44 PM |
#44 |
| -
Bullshit. |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 08:48 PM |
#45 |
| -
Still dodging? |
FBaggins |
Dec-10-11 08:52 PM |
#47 |
| -
Adhering to the point isn't "dodging" |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 09:06 PM |
#49 |
| -
Inventing the point, OTOH, *IS* |
FBaggins |
Dec-10-11 09:22 PM |
#53 |
| -
The "true believer" isn't swayed by logic or science... |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 09:51 PM |
#55 |
| -
Read Dr Till's statement on the Argonne process |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 09:31 PM |
#54 |
| -
He doesn't know his waste Classes |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 09:17 PM |
#51 |
| -
ONE reason to avoid nuclear power... |
Karenina |
Dec-09-11 11:29 PM |
#5 |
| -
One of the biggest, most important reasons - we failed already |
saras |
Dec-10-11 01:27 AM |
#6 |
| -
That was the argument; but what is the reality? |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 02:56 PM |
#8 |
| -
Nuclear cheerleaders live in a fantasy world. |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 03:27 PM |
#10 |
| -
For the United States.... |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 04:14 PM |
#12 |
| -
Proliferation-proof reprocessing |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 04:28 PM |
#13 |
| -
There it is, proof positive that nuclear cheerleaders live in a fantasy world. |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 05:46 PM |
#17 |
| -
NOPE |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 11:16 PM |
#65 |
| -
6 standard false claims of the nuclear industry |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 08:39 PM |
#41 |
| -
This is where knowing the science comes in handy. |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 10:27 PM |
#60 |
| -
Dual use technologies are part of the nuclear fuel cycles. |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 10:41 PM |
#62 |
| -
WRONG WRONG!!! |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 11:25 PM |
#67 |
| -
Expanding on the IEER points regarding reprocessing: |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 09:54 PM |
#56 |
| -
I stongly urge... |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 10:10 PM |
#58 |
| -
Is this an accurate statement of what you believe to be true regarding reprocessing? |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 10:23 PM |
#59 |
| -
Summary |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 10:39 PM |
#61 |
| -
Good. You are clearly on the record. |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 10:44 PM |
#63 |
| -
The parts I read were just plain WRONG!! |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 11:13 PM |
#64 |
| -
What good are these mere assertions by you, a known purveyor of false information? |
kristopher |
Dec-10-11 11:19 PM |
#66 |
| -
Evidently you aren't reading or at least understanding. |
PamW |
Dec-10-11 11:38 PM |
#68 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread