Reply #156: Kris suffers from "situational accuracy"

[PamW]

If a person agrees with kris, he's one of the top experts in the field (regardless of whether (s)he makes money shilling his position or lacks appropriate crentials or experience). If the person disagrees then they don't know anything about the subject and are bought and sold by the nuclear industry... again regardless of credentials or experience.
=============================================================

Remember the concept of "situational ethics". That is the concept that right and wrong
depend on the situation. It's the same as "unethical". It's a system where you can engage
in unethical conduct, but you can excuse it by claiming the situation made it ethical.

Kris believes in "situational accuracy". Just as you state above, if Kris agrees with some
statement, it must be truth; even if all of science says it is wrong.

If Kris disagrees with a statement, then it must be false; even if all of science says it is
true.

"Situational accuracy" the ultimate in self-serving philosophy; no self-righteous person
should be without it.

PamW