Turbineguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-16-11 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #63 |
|
Edited on Sat Apr-16-11 05:54 PM by Turbineguy
you even have a special word for overstating criticism! Very entertaining.
|
| -San Onofre nuke owner seeks $64 millon for seismic study |
jpak |
Apr-12-11 07:01 PM |
#0 |
-
Here's an offer I would make them. |
Cleita |
Apr-12-11 07:05 PM |
#1 |
-
So they want the tax payer to pick up the tab |
madokie |
Apr-12-11 07:06 PM |
#2 |
 -
I think it is ratepayer money - same diff - the owners won't pay for it themselves |
jpak |
Apr-12-11 07:18 PM |
#3 |
-
This is for a plant that is already up? |
EC |
Apr-12-11 08:01 PM |
#4 |
 -
Why, nuclear energy is perfectly safe |
madokie |
Apr-12-11 08:34 PM |
#5 |
 -
Seismic studies were done |
PamW |
Apr-14-11 09:16 PM |
#6 |
-
Pretending an accurate ability exsts to forecast earthquake timing and severity? |
kristopher |
Apr-14-11 09:20 PM |
#7 |
 -
Evidently you don't know what a seismic analysis is |
PamW |
Apr-15-11 05:50 AM |
#13 |
-
I understand both "seismic analysis" and the diff between "legal" and "social" sanctions. |
kristopher |
Apr-15-11 06:05 AM |
#15 |
-
What's your opinion of the seismic analysis at Fukushima? |
Wilms |
Apr-16-11 12:35 AM |
#22 |
-
Stranded costs of canceled US nuclear plants exceeded $100 billion - ratepayers paid those costs |
jpak |
Apr-14-11 09:23 PM |
#8 |
-
Seismic and tsunami risk assessments were conducted at Fukushima |
jpak |
Apr-14-11 09:31 PM |
#9 |
 -
Japanese regulation is nothing like that of the USA |
PamW |
Apr-15-11 05:57 AM |
#14 |
-
That's right, they are FAR more oriented to public safety in Japan than in the US |
kristopher |
Apr-15-11 06:22 AM |
#17 |
-
Tell us about the fire at Browns Ferry and how well thought out that design was |
jpak |
Apr-16-11 02:08 PM |
#27 |
-
Again "greenies" can't distiguish between bad design and bad operation |
PamW |
Apr-16-11 02:41 PM |
#35 |
-
Who licenses these inept operators, Pam? |
Wilms |
Apr-16-11 02:53 PM |
#36 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Apr-16-11 03:11 PM |
#40 |
-
Please don't lecture me on reading comprehension. |
Wilms |
Apr-16-11 03:18 PM |
#42 |
-
..the STATE!! |
PamW |
Apr-16-11 03:30 PM |
#46 |
-
Actually, your link does not assert that. |
Wilms |
Apr-16-11 03:49 PM |
#51 |
-
There were multiple design problems- those cables were vulnerable to a single failure |
jpak |
Apr-16-11 02:55 PM |
#37 |
-
Then you tell me how you would have designed it....., |
PamW |
Apr-16-11 03:18 PM |
#43 |
-
Not so fast... |
Wilms |
Apr-16-11 03:26 PM |
#44 |
 -
Bad reading comprehension again.... |
PamW |
Apr-16-11 03:34 PM |
#47 |
-
Care to address the inaccuracies of your reporting that I have indicated? |
Wilms |
Apr-16-11 03:50 PM |
#52 |
 -
No inaccuracies that I can see .... |
PamW |
Apr-16-11 03:57 PM |
#55 |
-
You claimed there was no design flaw. |
Wilms |
Apr-16-11 04:06 PM |
#57 |
-
LOL!111 |
jpak |
Apr-16-11 05:10 PM |
#62 |
-
Have you invented a molten salt breeder reactor? |
jpak |
Apr-16-11 05:07 PM |
#61 |
-
I would have designed it as a hybrid solar/wind plant with a biomass auxiliary |
jpak |
Apr-16-11 05:02 PM |
#59 |
-
Tell us how well Rancho Sucko worked out for SMUD customers |
jpak |
Apr-14-11 09:33 PM |
#10 |
-
Getting rid of Rancho Sucko (Seco) cost a lot, but was ultimately cost saving to people in |
diane in sf |
Apr-14-11 11:33 PM |
#11 |
 -
More "greenie logic" - aka "illogic" |
PamW |
Apr-15-11 09:10 PM |
#21 |
-
Well then, how is the very existence of a firm named SMUD help to confirm the industry's integrity? |
Wilms |
Apr-16-11 12:47 AM |
#23 |
 -
SMUD isn't a firm.... |
PamW |
Apr-16-11 02:04 PM |
#26 |
-
Brownies lost and rightly so |
jpak |
Apr-16-11 02:14 PM |
#29 |
-
Who, in fact, ran the plant then? |
Wilms |
Apr-16-11 02:21 PM |
#30 |
-
There was no firm |
PamW |
Apr-16-11 02:26 PM |
#33 |
-
Were these operators licensed, or hired off the street? |
Wilms |
Apr-16-11 02:30 PM |
#34 |
-
The anti-nukes wrote the book on it. |
PamW |
Apr-16-11 03:04 PM |
#39 |
-
Who licenses the operators of the steam plant? |
Wilms |
Apr-16-11 03:13 PM |
#41 |
-
No error here... |
PamW |
Apr-16-11 03:29 PM |
#45 |
-
An error on your part, and lie to cover it, AND insult me, again. |
Wilms |
Apr-16-11 03:44 PM |
#49 |
-
...and I stand by it as accurate... |
PamW |
Apr-16-11 03:55 PM |
#54 |
-
More equivocating. The record of your inaccurate reporting stands. n/t |
Wilms |
Apr-16-11 04:09 PM |
#58 |
-
Rancho Sucko was a POS with an abysmal capacity factor - it was a money pit |
jpak |
Apr-16-11 02:12 PM |
#28 |
-
If you don't know how to run it - no machine works well |
PamW |
Apr-16-11 02:22 PM |
#31 |
-
Brownie logic sez nukes are cheap, run perfectly and never harmed a fly |
jpak |
Apr-16-11 02:26 PM |
#32 |
-
The plant never had a chance. |
PamW |
Apr-15-11 06:08 AM |
#16 |
 -
So do have any links supporting your claim that anti-nukers prevented firing knuckleheads? |
Wilms |
Apr-16-11 12:57 AM |
#24 |
-
How well did the Coldwater Creek Geothermal plant work out for them? |
Throckmorton |
Apr-15-11 08:59 PM |
#20 |
-
The faster we can close these dangerous, obsolete nuke plants down the better off we'll be |
diane in sf |
Apr-14-11 11:45 PM |
#12 |
-
Nuclear power is uninsurable |
SHRED |
Apr-15-11 10:40 AM |
#18 |
 -
You've been reading the anti-nuke propaganda. |
PamW |
Apr-15-11 08:50 PM |
#19 |
-
You're both missing the real point. Who's really gonna pay? |
Wilms |
Apr-16-11 01:07 AM |
#25 |
 -
Of course - that's why they are called "consumers" |
PamW |
Apr-16-11 03:39 PM |
#48 |
-
Thank you for making my point. |
Wilms |
Apr-16-11 03:53 PM |
#53 |
-
Well then, let's test that stupid hypothesis and repeal Price-Anderson - then see what happens |
jpak |
Apr-16-11 03:00 PM |
#38 |
-
The Nuclear Waste Fund is running a POSITIVE balance |
PamW |
Apr-16-11 03:46 PM |
#50 |
-
The last cost estimate for Yucca Mountain was $100+ billion |
jpak |
Apr-16-11 04:00 PM |
#56 |
-
Once more a thread bogged down in arguments |
Turbineguy |
Apr-16-11 05:02 PM |
#60 |
-
What are you censoring about? |
Wilms |
Apr-16-11 05:33 PM |
#63 |
-
Fantastic! |
Turbineguy |
Apr-16-11 05:52 PM |
#64 |