You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #55: Did you by any chance look at those thermal images? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. Did you by any chance look at those thermal images?
Or did you just decide to insult others without appreciating what the thread was saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Analysis of radioactive emissions at Fukushima - much more than Chernobyl or TMI flamingdem  Apr-05-11 03:40 PM   #0 
  - K&R n/t  Mnemosyne    Apr-05-11 04:06 PM   #1 
  - 1 Chernobyl every 2-10 days in terms of Cs emissions. nt  thereismore   Apr-05-11 05:00 PM   #2 
  - 2.61 tons of radioactive poison....  DeSwiss   Apr-05-11 05:00 PM   #3 
  - Well.... it could be umm.. 200.62 tons so in a way we're lucky!  flamingdem   Apr-05-11 05:12 PM   #4 
     - Heres are article from the 15th that is saying that  madokie   Apr-20-11 07:27 PM   #38 
        - You were posting that just for the laughs, right?  FBaggins   Apr-20-11 11:17 PM   #40 
  - So says "Jim" ?  FBaggins   Apr-05-11 05:23 PM   #5 
  - Well according to you the current situation could not possibly occur.  kristopher   Apr-05-11 05:26 PM   #6 
  - And I was able to convince DU to hide that post, right?  FBaggins   Apr-05-11 05:27 PM   #7 
     - Bigger Point: "JIM" is doing the work, the analysis because he care about this  flamingdem   Apr-05-11 05:31 PM   #8 
     - If only "cares about this" added credibility.  FBaggins   Apr-05-11 09:03 PM   #10 
        - You've been wrong about everything at every stage...  kristopher   Apr-06-11 02:14 AM   #12 
           - You haven't read posts by this "kristopher" fellow, have you?  FBaggins   Apr-06-11 05:07 AM   #13 
              - he forgot to mention  SpoonFed   Apr-19-11 08:35 AM   #15 
              - Lol... you didn't follow yesterday's conversation , did you?  FBaggins   Apr-19-11 08:46 AM   #16 
                 - That is an interesting perspective.  kristopher   Apr-19-11 09:20 AM   #20 
                    - Not really... it's reality.  FBaggins   Apr-19-11 10:50 AM   #21 
                       - no, it's your pro-nuke myopic  SpoonFed   Apr-19-11 10:41 PM   #24 
                          - Thank youSpoonFed  diane in sf   Apr-21-11 02:30 AM   #41 
              - Your criticism of kristopher's ever-effervescent advocacy notwithstanding...  Wilms   Apr-19-11 08:53 AM   #17 
              - That's just the way thing are...  FBaggins   Apr-19-11 08:57 AM   #18 
                 - Your attempt at damage control makes the TEPCO PR Dept. blush.  Wilms   Apr-19-11 09:08 AM   #19 
                 - you have blinders on  SpoonFed   Apr-19-11 10:42 PM   #25 
              - You don't know how to debate, Frodo. You're too certain that you're right about everything.  ReturnoftheDjedi   Apr-20-11 10:47 AM   #34 
                 - I've seen that claim several times in the last couple days.  FBaggins   Apr-20-11 12:22 PM   #35 
                 - And it IS about the debate  Turbineguy   Apr-21-11 04:02 PM   #46 
     - You have been an unending fount of false conclusions  kristopher   Apr-05-11 05:45 PM   #9 
        - Heavy on bluster... low on facts.  FBaggins   Apr-05-11 09:09 PM   #11 
  - "Frodo" the internet Nuclear expert is so much more reliable, right?  ReturnoftheDjedi   Apr-20-11 10:42 AM   #32 
  - Kick.  kristopher   Apr-06-11 07:35 AM   #14 
  - Oh boy, another attempt to make this look worse than Chernobyl.  AtheistCrusader   Apr-19-11 11:27 AM   #22 
  - Not really "another"... just a bumped thread from two weeks ago.  FBaggins   Apr-19-11 11:33 AM   #23 
  - blatent logical inconsistency in your argument  SpoonFed   Apr-19-11 11:00 PM   #26 
  - Thank you, but I'll construct my own analogies.  AtheistCrusader   Apr-20-11 12:10 AM   #27 
     - uh, you're free to pick your poor analogies, sure  SpoonFed   Apr-20-11 08:03 AM   #28 
        - Nope.  AtheistCrusader   Apr-20-11 08:22 AM   #29 
        - I'll repeat it again  SpoonFed   Apr-20-11 09:06 AM   #30 
           - I think I see what you're getting at.  AtheistCrusader   Apr-20-11 09:38 AM   #31 
              - Right  SpoonFed   Apr-22-11 12:26 AM   #48 
        - An interesting note...  Someguyinjapan   Apr-22-11 06:35 AM   #50 
  - Iodine has a half-life of 8 days. Cesium's is about 30 years. More Cesium = Way worse  ReturnoftheDjedi   Apr-20-11 10:44 AM   #33 
     - "More cesium" DOES = "way worse"  FBaggins   Apr-20-11 12:47 PM   #36 
        - This matches what my nuclear physicist colleague found  caraher   Apr-20-11 08:45 PM   #39 
        - you mean that there's no mechanism yet.  ReturnoftheDjedi   Apr-21-11 11:30 AM   #43 
           - Outline a plausible mechanism...  caraher   Apr-21-11 08:49 PM   #47 
              - if anything makes it to the water table, the plume will be massive.  ReturnoftheDjedi   Apr-22-11 11:24 AM   #54 
                 - Did you by any chance look at those thermal images?  FBaggins   Apr-22-11 11:29 AM   #55 
                    - thermal imagery is useful but it is  SpoonFed   Apr-23-11 12:17 AM   #57 
                       - It doesn't HAVE to be "perfect" to prove the UFO nuts wrong.  FBaggins   Apr-23-11 06:23 AM   #59 
        - would you drink the Fukushima milk, Frodo?  ReturnoftheDjedi   Apr-21-11 11:29 AM   #42 
        - The stuff that passed for three weeks straight? Sure.  FBaggins   Apr-21-11 11:54 AM   #44 
           - where's the strontium? n/t  SpoonFed   Apr-23-11 12:18 AM   #58 
              - Hiding under Harry Potter's invisibility cloak?  FBaggins   Apr-23-11 06:30 AM   #60 
        - Once More...  Someguyinjapan   Apr-22-11 06:26 AM   #49 
           - Happy to oblige  FBaggins   Apr-22-11 06:47 AM   #51 
              - Maybe I didn't make myself clear  Someguyinjapan   Apr-22-11 07:26 AM   #52 
                 - Sorry... I guess I gave you too much credit.  FBaggins   Apr-22-11 07:55 AM   #53 
                    - seemed like a reasonable request  SpoonFed   Apr-23-11 12:11 AM   #56 
                       - Just proving your bias... thanks.  FBaggins   Apr-23-11 06:35 AM   #61 
                          - haha FBags doesn't know how to cite anything.  SpoonFed   Apr-23-11 09:03 AM   #62 
  - So that's  Turbineguy   Apr-20-11 04:23 PM   #37 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-21-11 11:56 AM   #45 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC