Reply #24: no, it's your pro-nuke myopic

[SpoonFed]

> Sure... but your definition of "pure garbage" is "someone who disagrees with kris"... just like your definition of "expert" (same) and "evidence" ("something that backs up what kris says").

I agree with Kris for the most part, he seems to understand peer-review and logical argumentation. I believe a large number of DUers agree with him too, since there are only a handful of hardcore pro-nuke types that collectively try to derail his posts, like you.

You on the other hand live in a pro-nuclear fantasy world. By evidence of this I suggest anyone take a look at the posts you wrote between the 11th of March and the present with a particular focus on the first two weeks of the disaster where in which you did nothing but construct imaginary thought experiments with no data (peer review or otherwise) in order to debunk the idea that the reactors were going ape shit and that the situation could reach INES Level 7. Post after post, day after day, while the skeptical common sense crowd were trying come to some sort of understanding of where the situation at Fukushima might end up, you did nothing but spout fact less pro-nuclear industry talking points with zero support. I and other argued with you ad naseum.

Well guess what buddy. It reached Level 7. Even now you're arguing in another thread that somehow some Level 7s are worse than other Level 7s.

> When the identical post/thread is posted over and over and OVER again... it IS spam.

Actually, take a look at your own posts. What is spam is your continuous seat of your pants armchair speculation of situations and engineer tasks that are beyond your intellectual capacity. You've made a fool out of yourself time and time again.

This bears the question, since you're so confident in your own intellectual capacity, why resort to the on again, off again character assassination attempts against DUers who differ from your views or people who actually are world renown and hold advanced university degrees in the subject?

I'd guess that the simply reason is because you're a years-long shill for the nuclear industry and that you've been disingenuously polluting the discussions on this board and trying to downplay this crisis every step of the way.

Or you're so arrogantly self-confident and enthralled with arguing on teh internets that you just don't know when to admit you're wrong and stfu and listen for a change rather than post contentless replies in every thread you come across.

From your delight in arguing and revelling in technical matters above your pay grade, I'm split between option one and option two.