You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #32: The first of several laws... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
PamW Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-26-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. The first of several laws...
Edited on Sat Mar-26-11 11:26 AM by PamW
Can you point me to the part of the law that outlaws recycling?
======================

Sec 105 says that there should be a reevaluation of the nuclear fuel
cycle with emphasis on alternatives to separating plutonium.

There were several laws that addressed this issue, and perhaps I don't
have the one that contains the explicit ban.

However, in the late '70s the USA was all set to reprocess and recycle
apent fuel. The forerunner of DOE, the ERDA, had filed the GESMO - the
Generic Environmetal Statement on Mixed Oxide. That was the required
environmental impact statement for the use of Mixed Oxide or MOX fuel.

That all came to a crashing halt when Congress outlawed reprocessing and
recycling, although I may have cited the wrong law with regard to the
explicit ban.

I absolutely hate attempting to parse all the legalese. The prohibition
may still be buried in there somewhere, it's just I can't stand to dig for
it. ( They always "hide" the true agenda in some obscure clause ).

Congress wrote other laws, like the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1984(?) and
the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1987. The latter, 1987 Act, is the one that
says the stated policy of the USA would be a "once through" nuclear fuel cycle
with the waste then going to the Yucca Mountain repository. Prior to this Act,
DOE had been considering multiple sites, and the 1987 Act is the one that says
Yucca would be the one and only repository.

PamW

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Japan Nuclear Crisis Revives Long U.S. Fight on Spent Fuel jpak  Mar-24-11 10:17 AM   #0 
  - No one state should have to cope with everyone else's spent fuel. nt  snagglepuss   Mar-24-11 10:33 AM   #1 
  - If we are gong to continue to use nuclear power...  Ozymanithrax   Mar-24-11 10:48 AM   #2 
  - Too bad we can't be a progressive thinking as Finland.  Statistical   Mar-24-11 11:08 AM   #3 
  - That repository will have remain intact for longer than modern humans have inhabited the planet  jpak   Mar-24-11 11:18 AM   #4 
  - Much better to leave it in pools lying all around the country.  Statistical   Mar-24-11 11:19 AM   #5 
  - Much better not to produce it at all  jpak   Mar-24-11 11:21 AM   #6 
  - It already has been produced.  Statistical   Mar-24-11 11:22 AM   #7 
  - Too late.. that ship has already sailed.  PamW   Mar-24-11 10:53 PM   #19 
  - better is or was or should have been to not make the stuff in the first place  madokie   Mar-24-11 08:45 PM   #14 
     - again.. that ship has already sailed.  PamW   Mar-24-11 10:55 PM   #20 
  - Why?  FBaggins   Mar-24-11 11:43 AM   #8 
     - Remain intact to sequester the inventroy of radionuclides so it doesn't poison Future Finns  jpak   Mar-24-11 01:09 PM   #9 
        - How does it "poison future Finns" from under 1700 feet of granite?  FBaggins   Mar-24-11 01:11 PM   #10 
           - Have you ever taken a geology class ot even looked at a granite outcrop?  jpak   Mar-24-11 01:14 PM   #11 
              - Sure. Have you?  FBaggins   Mar-24-11 01:28 PM   #12 
              - one may not mine it from granite...  PamW   Mar-24-11 11:01 PM   #21 
  - How will 1700ft of granite be installed under all the other nuclear plants on the planet?  Wilms   Mar-24-11 08:07 PM   #13 
     - Thats the one I want to see also  madokie   Mar-24-11 08:48 PM   #15 
     - Why would it need to be underneath every reactor?  Statistical   Mar-24-11 10:27 PM   #16 
        - What do you see as an end-game for spent fuel?  Wilms   Mar-24-11 10:47 PM   #17 
        - The real end game for spent fuel.  PamW   Mar-24-11 11:08 PM   #22 
           - Are actinide burner reactors ready for deployment? Or still experimental?  Wilms   Mar-25-11 12:07 AM   #23 
              - One potential "actinide burner" is Argonne's Integral Fast Reactor (IFR)  PamW   Mar-26-11 12:10 AM   #27 
                 - Too expensive?  BeFree   Mar-26-11 12:19 AM   #28 
                 - You only need a handful.  PamW   Mar-26-11 12:50 AM   #29 
                    - Amortize?  BeFree   Mar-26-11 12:12 PM   #36 
                    - Government has a surplus - not a debt.( the common lie )  PamW   Mar-26-11 12:50 PM   #38 
                       - Yeah  BeFree   Mar-26-11 01:00 PM   #39 
                       - Simple question - what happens at night?  PamW   Mar-26-11 01:13 PM   #41 
                       - Make the meter run backwards  BeFree   Mar-26-11 01:21 PM   #43 
                       - how much do you think....  PamW   Mar-26-11 05:12 PM   #45 
                       - All of your nuclear propaganda points are identified and placed in context by Lovins and others  kristopher   Mar-28-11 09:10 PM   #56 
                       - NAS said no such thing - no reputable scientist would misrepresent their work like that  kristopher   Mar-28-11 09:13 PM   #57 
                          - Just like below where PamW complains that the nuke industries hands were tied by Carter.  Wilms   Mar-28-11 09:20 PM   #58 
                       - You are certainly free with money that doesn't belong to you...  PamW   Mar-26-11 01:17 PM   #42 
                          - Yeah well  BeFree   Mar-26-11 01:26 PM   #44 
                             - the industry is doing the cleanup itself.  PamW   Mar-26-11 05:21 PM   #46 
                             - Who said I was frustrated????  PamW   Mar-26-11 05:28 PM   #47 
                                - Scientist?  BeFree   Mar-27-11 09:56 AM   #52 
                       - What does it say about your ethics when you falsify the evidence?  kristopher   Mar-28-11 09:22 PM   #59 
                    - No country has an operational "actinide burner"  Kolesar   Mar-27-11 08:43 AM   #51 
                 - MIT rejected IFR technology - it can't compete with renewables  kristopher   Mar-28-11 09:02 PM   #55 
        - A minor contribution from nuclear woud require a new Yucca Mtn every 2 years.  kristopher   Mar-28-11 07:59 PM   #54 
  - The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1987  PamW   Mar-24-11 10:51 PM   #18 
     - Wait. You said we could reuse the spent fuel?  Wilms   Mar-25-11 12:15 AM   #24 
        - Looks like shipping containers to me  Confusious   Mar-25-11 10:13 PM   #25 
        - two issues - one scientific, and one legal  PamW   Mar-25-11 11:59 PM   #26 
           - "Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978"  Wilms   Mar-26-11 08:02 AM   #30 
              - It depends...  PamW   Mar-26-11 10:59 AM   #31 
              - And what about your comments on the "Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978"?  Wilms   Mar-26-11 11:18 AM   #33 
                 - If memory serves...  PamW   Mar-26-11 01:04 PM   #40 
                 - Article  Confusious   Mar-26-11 06:24 PM   #48 
                    - Fail.  Wilms   Mar-26-11 09:53 PM   #49 
              - The first of several laws...  PamW   Mar-26-11 11:16 AM   #32 
                 - Perhaps you can cite the not "wrong law" to back up your claim. n/t  Wilms   Mar-26-11 11:20 AM   #34 
                 - Or did you cite a non-existant law, perhaps because of YOUR "true agenda"?  Wilms   Mar-26-11 11:50 AM   #35 
                    - Isn't that obvious???  PamW   Mar-26-11 12:26 PM   #37 
                       - Try again, Pam.  Wilms   Mar-26-11 09:56 PM   #50 
                       - Kicking for a response. n/t  Wilms   Mar-28-11 07:26 PM   #53 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC