PamW
(566 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-26-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
| 32. The first of several laws... |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-26-11 11:26 AM by PamW
Can you point me to the part of the law that outlaws recycling? ======================
Sec 105 says that there should be a reevaluation of the nuclear fuel cycle with emphasis on alternatives to separating plutonium.
There were several laws that addressed this issue, and perhaps I don't have the one that contains the explicit ban.
However, in the late '70s the USA was all set to reprocess and recycle apent fuel. The forerunner of DOE, the ERDA, had filed the GESMO - the Generic Environmetal Statement on Mixed Oxide. That was the required environmental impact statement for the use of Mixed Oxide or MOX fuel.
That all came to a crashing halt when Congress outlawed reprocessing and recycling, although I may have cited the wrong law with regard to the explicit ban.
I absolutely hate attempting to parse all the legalese. The prohibition may still be buried in there somewhere, it's just I can't stand to dig for it. ( They always "hide" the true agenda in some obscure clause ).
Congress wrote other laws, like the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1984(?) and the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1987. The latter, 1987 Act, is the one that says the stated policy of the USA would be a "once through" nuclear fuel cycle with the waste then going to the Yucca Mountain repository. Prior to this Act, DOE had been considering multiple sites, and the 1987 Act is the one that says Yucca would be the one and only repository.
PamW
|