You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #11: Probably not, but then we have been lied to so often. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Probably not, but then we have been lied to so often.
And last I heard, the Japanese will be releasing still more radioactive gas into the air.

I am really not worried -- but as I said, we shall see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Radiation levels at Fukushima Plant continue to decline. FBaggins  Mar-19-11 10:33 PM   #0 
  - We are scheduled for rain in S. California.  JDPriestly   Mar-19-11 10:41 PM   #1 
  - So far we haven't seen anything outside of about a ten-mile circle that is IN  FBaggins   Mar-19-11 10:44 PM   #2 
  - Probably not, but then we have been lied to so often.  JDPriestly   Mar-20-11 01:35 AM   #11 
  - Can I interest you in a sky proof hat Chicken Little?  TheMadMonk   Mar-19-11 11:25 PM   #7 
  - !  Poll_Blind   Mar-19-11 10:48 PM   #3 
  - Get sick for a week, and look at what one can miss  Dogmudgeon   Mar-19-11 10:49 PM   #4 
  - Yes... It's all your fault.  FBaggins   Mar-19-11 10:56 PM   #5 
  - Annual occupational limits are 5r - unless reactor standards are ...  ebayfool   Mar-19-11 11:02 PM   #6 
  - You're correct on the first point, but off on the second.  FBaggins   Mar-20-11 07:56 AM   #12 
     - Inverse square law says otherwise -  ebayfool   Mar-20-11 12:51 PM   #13 
        - That's a common error. You've confused "radiation" with "radioactive material"  FBaggins   Mar-20-11 01:12 PM   #14 
           - That's alotta assumptions ...  ebayfool   Mar-20-11 01:44 PM   #15 
              - There aren't really many assumptions in that post.  FBaggins   Mar-20-11 03:51 PM   #16 
  - The Nuclear Energy Institute is a lobbying group for the nuclear power industry.  girl gone mad   Mar-19-11 11:26 PM   #8 
  - Did they get the reactors fixed? Are the spent fuel ponds covered?  neverforget   Mar-19-11 11:32 PM   #9 
  - the source of this is really dodgy, the Nuclear Energy Institute is a pro-nuke shill group  stockholmer   Mar-19-11 11:57 PM   #10 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC