Reply #55: No, it isn't opinion, it is a straight accounting of the cost claims.

[kristopher]

If you have evidence that the methods are flawed, why not share them in an actual discussion instead using the oldest dodge in the book.

According to nuclear power proponents, there are no studies critical of nuclear power that have any validity at all, an argument which very quickly resolves itself as nothing more than a transparent dodge.

In this case you made a direct verifiable statement about the costs of nuclear power which is explicitly contradicted by the historical evidence in the study; so of course, "the study is flawed".