kristopher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-01-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
| 28. Jacobson's work is solid analysis |
|
Edited on Sat May-01-10 01:48 PM by kristopher
The criticisms you offer would not pass peer review. We know that because it was tried and the critique was rejected by the journal. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph... |
| -Building more nuclear to combat climate change is like cutting off your head to cure a brain tumor. |
kristopher |
Apr-30-10 01:50 PM |
#0 |
 -
I am as concerned as the next person about nuclear, but most |
jtuck004 |
Apr-30-10 02:07 PM |
#1 |
| -
Really? |
Nederland |
Apr-30-10 02:09 PM |
#2 |
  -
That is one (wrong) way to look at it. |
kristopher |
Apr-30-10 02:26 PM |
#5 |
| -
No |
Nederland |
Apr-30-10 02:31 PM |
#7 |
| -
ROFL... |
kristopher |
Apr-30-10 02:47 PM |
#10 |
| -
Ctrl-V for Victory! |
Nederland |
Apr-30-10 06:03 PM |
#18 |
| -
Only fools |
madokie |
Apr-30-10 02:09 PM |
#3 |
| -
There is a safe way to deal with it. |
Statistical |
Apr-30-10 02:24 PM |
#4 |
| -
Ramping up nuclear power to solve climate change would require a new Yucca every 2 years. |
kristopher |
Apr-30-10 02:28 PM |
#6 |
| -
Only if the goal is for nuclear energy to provide 100% of worlds energy |
Statistical |
Apr-30-10 02:34 PM |
#8 |
| -
100% would require MORE THAN a new Yucca every 8 months. |
kristopher |
Apr-30-10 03:02 PM |
#11 |
| -
Well that would be 33% global nuclear power. |
Statistical |
Apr-30-10 03:16 PM |
#12 |
| -
It DOES "mean a modest growth in nuclear power is "useless"". |
kristopher |
Apr-30-10 03:53 PM |
#13 |
| -
Your premise is based on the UTTERLY BS "analysis" by Jacobson. |
Statistical |
Apr-30-10 03:57 PM |
#14 |
| -
Jacobson's analysis isn't BS. It is solid. |
kristopher |
Apr-30-10 04:09 PM |
#15 |
| -
THERE IS NOTHING THAT IS VALID ABOUT HIS "ANALYSIS" |
Statistical |
Apr-30-10 04:17 PM |
#16 |
| -
All of his inputs are supported. You just want him to use deceptive nuclear industry data instead. |
kristopher |
Apr-30-10 04:28 PM |
#17 |
| -
He cherry picks his inputs |
Nederland |
Apr-30-10 08:59 PM |
#19 |
| -
More piffle from the pronuclear antitruth squad... |
kristopher |
Apr-30-10 11:22 PM |
#20 |
| -
You completely missed the point |
Nederland |
Apr-30-10 11:53 PM |
#21 |
| -
No, I didn't. I addressed the point directly. It is the difference between pretend blog analysis |
kristopher |
May-01-10 12:02 AM |
#22 |
| -
The ignorance on display is stunning |
Nederland |
May-01-10 02:56 AM |
#23 |
| -
The future will be similar to the past. |
kristopher |
May-01-10 12:17 PM |
#25 |
| -
You are right |
Nederland |
May-01-10 01:37 PM |
#27 |
| -
Jacobson's work is solid analysis |
kristopher |
May-01-10 01:47 PM |
#28 |
| -
Jacobson's work is a theory |
Nederland |
May-01-10 10:51 PM |
#29 |
| -
More piffle from the pronuclear antitruth squad... |
kristopher |
May-01-10 11:05 PM |
#30 |
| -
No, Jacobson's work is not "a theory." It is a review of technologies... |
joshcryer |
May-02-10 04:18 AM |
#35 |
| -
Correct |
Nederland |
May-03-10 09:57 AM |
#36 |
| -
Jacobson's work is not an analysis, it is a review. |
joshcryer |
May-02-10 04:16 AM |
#34 |
| -
"reasonable expectation that future wind turbines will be better than existing technology" |
joshcryer |
May-02-10 04:12 AM |
#33 |
| -
It's not a paper, it's a review, which is distinct in the peer review process. |
joshcryer |
May-02-10 04:10 AM |
#32 |
| -
Now we have anti-nukes who discuss science without knowing any composing metaphors |
NNadir |
Apr-30-10 02:43 PM |
#9 |
| -
Now we have pro-nukes who discuss science without knowing any composing metaphors |
jpak |
May-01-10 12:58 PM |
#26 |
| -
Ummm, if you're going to do something as childish as change around somebodies post... |
eqfan592 |
May-03-10 06:37 PM |
#43 |
| -
If you're going to do something as childish as criticizing someone |
kristopher |
May-03-10 07:29 PM |
#46 |
| -
I've been reading about a new type of reactor, molten salt reactors |
crikkett |
May-01-10 12:15 PM |
#24 |
| -
The key is if it was true |
madokie |
May-01-10 11:37 PM |
#31 |
| -
The Black Swan |
arachadillo |
May-03-10 02:31 PM |
#37 |
| -
Yup - good post. nt |
bananas |
May-03-10 03:43 PM |
#38 |
| -
There are two types of statistics |
Nederland |
May-03-10 05:43 PM |
#39 |
| -
Two types? |
kristopher |
May-03-10 05:50 PM |
#40 |
| -
Ok |
Nederland |
May-03-10 06:09 PM |
#41 |
| -
Do you have any legitimate questions that address the issue? |
kristopher |
May-03-10 06:34 PM |
#42 |
| -
His were perfectly legitimate questions. |
eqfan592 |
May-03-10 06:40 PM |
#44 |
| -
No they were not legitimate questions. |
kristopher |
May-03-10 07:24 PM |
#45 |
| -
If they were not legitimate questions... |
Nederland |
May-03-10 11:11 PM |
#49 |
| -
What's the point in asking them? |
kristopher |
May-04-10 12:12 AM |
#52 |
| -
To prove you wrong |
Nederland |
May-04-10 12:33 AM |
#53 |
| -
You're dead in the water, dude. Your postion has no merit. |
kristopher |
May-04-10 12:48 AM |
#54 |
| -
Let's review |
Nederland |
May-04-10 10:55 AM |
#57 |
| -
Yes, let's review. |
kristopher |
May-04-10 02:47 PM |
#60 |
| -
Answer the questions |
Nederland |
May-04-10 03:01 PM |
#61 |
| -
Sure. |
kristopher |
May-04-10 03:19 PM |
#63 |
| -
LOL - you just used the faulty reasoning the other poster was talking about! |
bananas |
May-03-10 07:57 PM |
#47 |
| -
A simple question |
Nederland |
May-03-10 11:11 PM |
#50 |
| -
A better simpler question. |
kristopher |
May-04-10 12:50 AM |
#55 |
| -
The Black Swan stuff really went over your head, didn't it? |
bananas |
May-04-10 04:50 AM |
#56 |
| -
Nope |
Nederland |
May-04-10 10:57 AM |
#58 |
| -
Apparently, you didn't read the links in the post you responded to |
bananas |
May-03-10 08:32 PM |
#48 |
| -
The payoffs of nuclear power |
Nederland |
May-03-10 11:20 PM |
#51 |
| -
annually eliminates billions of tons of CO2, 100 M tons of coal ash, acid rain... |
BrightKnight |
May-06-10 01:02 PM |
#65 |
| -
re: two types of statistics |
arachadillo |
May-04-10 02:40 PM |
#59 |
| -
A fair criticism |
Nederland |
May-04-10 03:09 PM |
#62 |
| -
Al Qaeda’s Nuclear Plant |
arachadillo |
May-06-10 11:02 AM |
#64 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread