You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #13: Really? Only a "fool" would equate this with so called "nuclear waste?" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Really? Only a "fool" would equate this with so called "nuclear waste?"
Edited on Thu Mar-11-10 12:41 AM by NNadir
I have not met one glib hand waving dangerous fossil fuel apologist who understands a thing about the chemistry of nuclear fuel.

Many of them are pretty good at producing incoherent babbling however.

This piece of crap, which produced insignificant energy at huge expense is now garbage. It didn't even last 10 years.

A nuclear reactor is a highly complex device that requires an education to comprehend. I note that the biggest critics of nuclear energy - the one's who think that their electricity comes out of a wall socket and that any technology they can't buy at hardware store it isn't worth utilizing - are precisely the ones who are the least educated about the subject.

If one don't have a productive job, and if one not really smart enough to manage things like grammar, punctutation or capitalization, nuclear technology and nuclear science are clearly beyond one.

My opinion of the anti-nukes is that they all represent the members of the drinking class that used to make fart jokes during science classes to obscure the fact that they couldn't understand a word of what was being said in the front of the room.

Have a nice plastered evening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Three million dollar 187 Ton Wind Turbine Crashes From 200 Feet, Waking the Neighbor Across the.... NNadir  Mar-10-10 05:33 PM   #0 
  - Can we call this a "Wind Event"?  OneTenthofOnePercent   Mar-10-10 05:40 PM   #1 
  - Not a wind power fan, I take it?  Xipe Totec   Mar-10-10 05:45 PM   #2 
  - I am, in fact, being quite restrained. Telling you how I really feel, given that this  NNadir   Mar-10-10 05:50 PM   #3 
  - He is violently opposed to ALL forms of power generation other than nuclear.  kestrel91316   Mar-10-10 06:14 PM   #4 
     - Never would have guessed...  Xipe Totec   Mar-10-10 06:32 PM   #6 
     - ...nor the nuclear proliferation issue  Viking12   Mar-10-10 08:23 PM   #8 
     - Actually, I have talked extensively on the use of used nuclear fuels.  NNadir   Mar-11-10 08:20 AM   #14 
  - A catastrophic failure of a wind turbine  bergie321   Mar-10-10 06:26 PM   #5 
  - Bit tiresome.... n/t  FedUpWithIt All   Mar-10-10 08:14 PM   #7 
  - Mechanical failures happen  guardian   Mar-10-10 08:38 PM   #9 
  - Well I'll be, you don't say.  madokie   Mar-10-10 09:06 PM   #10 
  - I want one too!!  BeFree   Mar-10-10 09:31 PM   #11 
  - Really? Only a "fool" would equate this with so called "nuclear waste?"  NNadir   Mar-11-10 12:39 AM   #13 
  - Where is the oversight?  joshcryer   Mar-10-10 10:36 PM   #12 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC