You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: It's not really that expensive. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. It's not really that expensive.
But simply buying new uranium is even cheaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Fourth generation nuclear power a buzz phrase with little behind it madokie  Mar-04-10 03:05 AM   #0 
  - ... there are no Gen IV reactors being built or even considered.  joshcryer   Mar-04-10 03:36 AM   #1 
  - Good for you  madokie   Mar-04-10 03:53 AM   #2 
  - The Gen IV Pebble Bed Modular Reactor was considered and rejected  bananas   Mar-04-10 07:33 AM   #6 
  - Getting the FUD out early isn't he  Confusious   Mar-04-10 04:50 AM   #3 
  - Propaganda. For instance...  RC   Mar-04-10 06:10 AM   #4 
  - +1 nt  wtmusic   Mar-04-10 01:27 PM   #9 
  - About the comments  kristopher   Mar-04-10 06:57 AM   #5 
  - What possible "meaning" is there to bashing technology that isn't used yet?  TheWraith   Mar-04-10 11:52 AM   #7 
     - .  kristopher   Mar-04-10 01:24 PM   #8 
        - So scientific research determined a way that isn't practical. That's how it's supposed to work.  TheWraith   Mar-04-10 09:46 PM   #12 
  - Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't reprocessing of fuel rods not allowed in the US?  OneTenthofOnePercent   Mar-04-10 05:10 PM   #10 
  - You are wrong, Reagan revoked the ban on reprocessing way back in 1981, it's still "a goofy idea"  bananas   Mar-04-10 05:48 PM   #11 
  - It's not really that expensive.  TheWraith   Mar-04-10 09:50 PM   #13 
     - It's the good old two-faced "Green" argument again  Nihil   Mar-05-10 04:11 AM   #14 
     - Nope, the only difference is the danger of it  madokie   Mar-05-10 05:55 AM   #15 
     - two- faced "Green" argument?  kristopher   Mar-05-10 10:38 AM   #16 
     - Yep  Nihil   Mar-05-10 08:24 PM   #25 
        - I'm calling bullshit on that assertion  kristopher   Mar-05-10 10:10 PM   #28 
           - I'm calling bullshit on your bullshit.  Nihil   Mar-07-10 04:59 PM   #30 
              - Exactly as I thought - you cannot support your assertion regarding the deficiency of renewables.  kristopher   Mar-07-10 05:31 PM   #31 
                 - Exactly as I thought - you didn't read the thread, just reacted to key words.  Nihil   Mar-08-10 04:00 AM   #32 
     - No, the "Green" argument is very consistent: we shouldn't be making this stuff in the first place  bananas   Mar-05-10 02:54 PM   #19 
     - Hey we "shouldn't" be making CO2 either so what's your next step?  Nihil   Mar-05-10 08:27 PM   #26 
     - You can't really "recycle" uranium  bananas   Mar-06-10 12:10 AM   #29 
     - Exactly.  Statistical   Mar-05-10 03:47 PM   #20 
  - Reactor has to be specifically designed for Thorium  Statistical   Mar-05-10 03:54 PM   #21 
  - I wonder if George Plumb, who clearly is unfamiliar with nuclear technology knows about COPD  NNadir   Mar-05-10 02:13 PM   #17 
     - It isn't a choice between fossil fuels and nuclear  kristopher   Mar-05-10 02:50 PM   #18 
        - The soothsaying crap has NOTHING to do with reality. Every nuclear plant shut by ignorance  NNadir   Mar-05-10 04:57 PM   #22 
           - I think that anger of yours has a much larger base than that  madokie   Mar-05-10 05:04 PM   #23 
           - Not wishing to jump in on the personal argument betwen you two ..  Nihil   Mar-05-10 08:32 PM   #27 
           - That's the "man wasn't meant to fly" fallacy  kristopher   Mar-05-10 05:21 PM   #24 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC