You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #64: And when the West Antarctic Ice Shelf goes... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
64. And when the West Antarctic Ice Shelf goes...
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Oceans rise faster than expected as climate change exceeds grimmest models Louisiana1976  Nov-23-09 10:07 AM   #0 
  - I guess the Oceans didn't get the "climate change is a hoax" memo  ixion   Nov-23-09 10:10 AM   #1 
  - In geologic time, its a fairly recent memo, and oceans (frankly) are not very quick on the uptake  OKIsItJustMe   Nov-23-09 10:56 AM   #2 
  - Exponential increase. Not to mention the addition of modernization of the remiander of the world.  Gregorian   Nov-23-09 11:10 AM   #3 
  - Even population stablization doesn't fix it, we need a concerted effort to go to zero emissions.  joshcryer   Nov-23-09 04:52 PM   #4 
     - You know, even if we went to zero emissions tomorrow, thats still true  OKIsItJustMe   Nov-23-09 05:55 PM   #7 
     - If we stopped tomorrow we might be OK, but since ice melt is a feedback loop....  joshcryer   Nov-23-09 06:07 PM   #8 
     - I guess screwed is a relative term  OKIsItJustMe   Nov-23-09 06:09 PM   #9 
        - I plan to live a really longtime so perhaps "we" does include me.  joshcryer   Nov-23-09 06:11 PM   #10 
     - What we need is negative emissions  Dead_Parrot   Nov-23-09 06:40 PM   #11 
        - Which brings us back to GeoEngineering  OKIsItJustMe   Nov-23-09 06:47 PM   #13 
        - I was thinking of a more direct approach.  Dead_Parrot   Nov-23-09 07:39 PM   #15 
           - If you tax carbon it could pay for it 1:1. Make the tax the cost to remove it.  joshcryer   Nov-23-09 08:58 PM   #17 
           - Doesn't need to be zero-emission, though  Dead_Parrot   Nov-23-09 09:14 PM   #19 
           - Who says it needs to be revenue neutral?  OKIsItJustMe   Nov-23-09 10:27 PM   #23 
              - Problem is...  Dead_Parrot   Nov-23-09 10:31 PM   #25 
              - Hell, I'd rather we actually ban carbon emissions over a decade and spent 100 trillion...  joshcryer   Nov-23-09 11:43 PM   #26 
           - Yeah, like I said, GeoEngineering  OKIsItJustMe   Nov-23-09 10:22 PM   #22 
           - Think I was using a different definition  Dead_Parrot   Nov-23-09 10:30 PM   #24 
           - Heres the definition of the National Academies from 1992  OKIsItJustMe   Nov-24-09 10:31 AM   #34 
           - When you say, "I'm pretty well convinced that we dont stand a chance without something like this"  GliderGuider   Nov-24-09 10:37 AM   #35 
              - A good question, to which I wish I had an equally good answer  OKIsItJustMe   Nov-24-09 11:04 AM   #36 
                 - I've taken the extinction end-point out of my considerations.  GliderGuider   Nov-24-09 11:40 AM   #39 
                    - I agree that there is a wide (but rapidly narrowing) range of possibilities  OKIsItJustMe   Nov-24-09 12:33 PM   #40 
                       - The problem as I see it that we may be able to predict an event, but not its impacts.  GliderGuider   Nov-24-09 01:34 PM   #41 
                          - others could be turned off if unintended effects occur.  OKIsItJustMe   Nov-24-09 03:03 PM   #42 
           - Making coal seems a pretty good deal too...  hunter   Nov-27-09 10:39 AM   #57 
        - My idea, have little solar-powered nano-bots convert CO2 into O2 and pure carbon.  Odin2005   Nov-29-09 11:07 AM   #63 
     - If we don't get a quick handle on population growth, all of the rest is futile.  Gregorian   Nov-23-09 07:01 PM   #14 
        - Unfortunately the best method for population ceasation is a higher standard of living.  joshcryer   Nov-23-09 08:53 PM   #16 
           - Absolutely. By unfortunate, I suppose you mean higher carbon footprint.  Gregorian   Nov-23-09 09:36 PM   #20 
           - Indeed, though theoreticallly a proper high level society need no carbon footprint.  joshcryer   Nov-23-09 11:45 PM   #27 
           - Which is why immigration is high in the developed world  The2ndWheel   Nov-24-09 11:34 AM   #38 
  - recommended. People don't realize that it's very difficult to gauge the RATE of acceleration of GW.  JohnWxy   Nov-23-09 05:43 PM   #5 
  - Hansen said years ago that sea ice melt was going to smack us in the face.  joshcryer   Nov-23-09 05:51 PM   #6 
  - And like I keep saying,  Bigmack   Nov-23-09 06:42 PM   #12 
  - That produces a local effect, though. Europe gets colder, no more fine wines.  joshcryer   Nov-23-09 09:05 PM   #18 
  - I agree...no GLOBAL  Bigmack   Nov-23-09 09:39 PM   #21 
  - Really hard to say  Nederland   Nov-24-09 02:30 AM   #31 
  - What a lousy article  Nederland   Nov-24-09 12:54 AM   #28 
  - Search for the scientists' names.  joshcryer   Nov-24-09 01:47 AM   #29 
     - Thanks  Nederland   Nov-24-09 02:13 AM   #30 
        - You have to look at that graph in context. The 08 series is La Nina, it should be much lower.  joshcryer   Nov-24-09 03:24 AM   #32 
        - I think when scientists say "accelerated" they mean from past or known model predictions.  joshcryer   Nov-24-09 04:53 AM   #33 
        - Please note that sea level rise is not uniform  OKIsItJustMe   Nov-24-09 11:31 AM   #37 
           - Then it isn't simply due to more melt water? NT  Howzit   Nov-25-09 12:04 AM   #43 
           - Thermal expansion.  joshcryer   Nov-25-09 12:05 AM   #44 
              - There are other factors as well  OKIsItJustMe   Nov-25-09 04:01 PM   #48 
           - In the short run and for small increases, yes  Nederland   Nov-25-09 11:36 AM   #45 
              - If future flow increases, as is being observed, the baseline changes.  joshcryer   Nov-25-09 02:58 PM   #46 
              - No, that doesn't necessarily follow, although it might seem to be common sense  OKIsItJustMe   Nov-25-09 03:55 PM   #47 
                 - That makes no sense whatsoever  Nederland   Nov-26-09 03:46 PM   #49 
                    - It's just the way the effects add up  Dead_Parrot   Nov-26-09 04:17 PM   #50 
                    - isostatic rebound  OKIsItJustMe   Nov-26-09 11:40 PM   #52 
                       - Hmm. Not sure...  Dead_Parrot   Nov-27-09 12:12 AM   #53 
                          - Start your poking here  OKIsItJustMe   Nov-27-09 12:33 AM   #54 
                             - LOL. I just found that article...  Dead_Parrot   Nov-27-09 12:54 AM   #55 
                             - Err ... what?  Nihil   Nov-27-09 06:24 AM   #56 
                                - 30 gt of CO2 a year = massive fluxes in natural systems = holy crap.  joshcryer   Nov-28-09 05:45 PM   #60 
                    - The thing is Nederland, the east ice sheet was not expected to melt until well after 2.0C.  joshcryer   Nov-26-09 10:28 PM   #51 
                       - I take away a different lesson  Nederland   Nov-28-09 01:37 PM   #58 
                          - IPCC AR4 noted that our dynamical ice flow models were guesses.  joshcryer   Nov-28-09 03:26 PM   #59 
                             - Good point  Nederland   Nov-29-09 09:56 AM   #62 
                                - I'm disappointed that that CO2 / temperature measuring satellite didn't make orbit.  joshcryer   Nov-29-09 11:34 AM   #65 
  - Interesting thread.  Quantess   Nov-28-09 10:50 PM   #61 
  - And when the West Antarctic Ice Shelf goes...  Odin2005   Nov-29-09 11:11 AM   #64 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC