bananas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-16-09 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 22. Oh bull. The fact is that the dumb pro-nuke set is extremely unfamiliar with economics, |
|
and only someone out of touch with reality would write "the airhead Joe Romm down to the smallest fundie disciple": As far as the rest of NNadir's post - only someone who doesn't understand economics would try to compare the price of solar panels today with nuclear plants that won't come online for ten years or more (if they aren't cancelled due to construction flaws or cost overruns).
|
| -Nuclear Bombshell: $26 Billion cost — $10,800 per kilowatt! — killed Ontario nuclear bid |
bananas |
Jul-15-09 07:31 PM |
#0 |
-
Yes. When all the real costs of nuclear, including storage of waste,decommissioning,&true liability |
lindisfarne |
Jul-15-09 07:44 PM |
#1 |
 -
We must never forget the pro-nukers have been lying to us for years now |
madokie |
Jul-15-09 07:49 PM |
#3 |
  -
Yes, and now, even costs are being claimed to be trade secrets in attempts to obscure the truth. |
lindisfarne |
Jul-15-09 07:52 PM |
#4 |
 -
Oh bull. The fact is that the dumb anti-nuke set is extremely unfamiliar with economics, |
NNadir |
Jul-15-09 08:05 PM |
#5 |
  -
Did you read the link in OP? Also, in your calculations, did you include the actual |
lindisfarne |
Jul-15-09 08:08 PM |
#6 |
   -
Big guy don't read links |
madokie |
Jul-15-09 10:16 PM |
#10 |
    -
But they can unrec this issue |
Liberation Angel |
Jul-16-09 12:17 AM |
#13 |
    -
nnadir never fails to entertain. nt |
Javaman |
Jul-17-09 12:07 PM |
#35 |
   -
you don't need to store for tens of thousands of years. |
Sirveri |
Jul-16-09 12:28 AM |
#14 |
  -
No, you have to store it for a million years - EPA requirement, based on NAS report |
bananas |
Jul-16-09 11:54 AM |
#18 |
   -
EPA requirement is a smokescreen for the real reason. |
Sirveri |
Jul-17-09 01:29 AM |
#30 |
  -
No, it wasn't a "smokescreen". |
bananas |
Jul-17-09 03:07 AM |
#31 |
  -
Time will tell. But with the current state of US politics I see coal in the future. |
Sirveri |
Jul-17-09 04:54 AM |
#32 |
  -
Oil is less than 2% of current electric generation. |
kristopher |
Aug-05-09 10:14 PM |
#37 |
  -
You want mayonaise on that shit samwich |
madokie |
Jul-16-09 12:28 PM |
#20 |
  -
tell that to the US Navy and France. |
Sirveri |
Jul-17-09 01:15 AM |
#29 |
  -
It's easy to be anything one thinks they want to be here on the Internet |
madokie |
Jul-17-09 05:44 AM |
#33 |
  -
Wow really, I had NO idea. |
Sirveri |
Jul-17-09 11:36 AM |
#34 |
  -
Oh bull. The fact is that the dumb pro-nuke set is extremely unfamiliar with economics, |
bananas |
Jul-16-09 03:24 PM |
#22 |
 -
What were the real costs of earlier non-nuclear power generation methods? |
TheMadMonk |
Jul-17-09 01:10 AM |
#28 |
-
2-4-6-8 -- NUCLEAR POWER -- AIN'T IT GREAT?!?! |
xchrom |
Jul-15-09 07:45 PM |
#2 |
-
Nuclear energy is free- we have a giant nuclear reactor in the sky. |
Ian David |
Jul-15-09 08:57 PM |
#7 |
 -
And it's responsible for wind powersolar power, and hydroelectric power. Not geothermal though- |
lindisfarne |
Jul-15-09 09:10 PM |
#8 |
-
For geothermal we can thank the other stars that supplied the material that made the Earth. |
GliderGuider |
Jul-15-09 10:05 PM |
#9 |
-
Geothermal energy is produced by nuclear fission |
Dogmudgeon |
Jul-16-09 10:40 AM |
#16 |
-
I doubt that nuclear reaction is responsible for geothermal energy.. |
TheCoxwain |
Jul-16-09 11:49 AM |
#17 |
-
I think you've got your Uranium isotopes backwards... |
SidDithers |
Jul-16-09 11:59 AM |
#19 |
 -
yup .. my bad .. clearly its been a while ..but I think that does not water my argument down |
TheCoxwain |
Jul-16-09 12:52 PM |
#21 |
-
20% planetary accretion, 80% radioactive decay |
bananas |
Jul-16-09 04:26 PM |
#24 |
-
K&R and into the greatest page -- let's see if the unrec does it in |
Liberation Angel |
Jul-16-09 12:01 AM |
#11 |
-
UNWRECKER strikes again OFF Greatest page! Damn BUT see this: |
Liberation Angel |
Jul-16-09 12:16 AM |
#12 |
 -
Only a shill would unrec this thread - they want to hide the true costs. |
bananas |
Jul-16-09 03:38 PM |
#23 |
 -
They've got it down to three recs - they are really afraid of this information! |
bananas |
Jul-16-09 07:25 PM |
#25 |
-
It fits with the way it's been with the nuke crowd from the get go |
madokie |
Jul-16-09 07:34 PM |
#26 |
-
3 recs is their goal |
Liberation Angel |
Jul-16-09 10:14 PM |
#27 |
-
No surprise. |
girl gone mad |
Jul-16-09 01:19 AM |
#15 |
-
Who knows the price? - nobody yet |
DiamondJoe |
Aug-05-09 03:47 PM |
#36 |