You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Green Industry: In Its Basic Form It Means We All Have To Buy New Stuff - Lots Of It" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 12:27 PM
Original message
"Green Industry: In Its Basic Form It Means We All Have To Buy New Stuff - Lots Of It"
Advertisements [?]
Let’s get something straight about green industry: in its basic form it means we all have to buy new stuff … lots of it. As an industrial policy that will create jobs and increase spending, it’s pretty sound. As an environmental policy, it’s largely a fraud.

Nowhere is it more disingenuous than the pursuit of the fuel-efficient car. In their effort to stave off collapse of their industry, auto executives have continually cited their efforts are building the high-efficiency cars of the future. The problem is, there are no cars of the future, and the looming catastrophe of global pollution, including climate change, will never be solved by building more cars – efficient or otherwise.

We’d desperately like to believe that there is a way to preserve our car-centered civilization, while simultaneously placating the gods of atmospheric warming. Even the president-elect believes it, and Obama made fuel-efficient cars a central part of his energy policy. He promised a $7,000 tax credit to hybrid car buyers, aiming for a million plug-in hybrids, getting 150 mpg, by 2015. He wants to put an additional million completely plug-in vehicles by the same year. And he’s willing to federal funds up for research, or at least he was before we lost all our money.

Even on its face, this seems like a tepid response to climate change. At the moment there are upward of 250,000,000 registered vehicles in the United States – more than there are licensed drivers. Converting one percent or so of them to greater fuel efficiency is not likely to do very much in the time needed to act. Nevertheless, the hope is that introduction of a new generation of electric and semi-electric will eventually lead to a replacement of our entire fleet of gas-guzzlers. Maybe. But the bigger problem is that increasing fuel efficiency has never led to an overall reduction in pollutants. In fact, efficiency has always led to more production and consumption.

EDIT

http://www.progressive.org/mag/mpdubro020309.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -"Green Industry: In Its Basic Form It Means We All Have To Buy New Stuff - Lots Of It" hatrack  Feb-03-09 12:27 PM   #0 
  - Which is why I can't reconcile new road-building and green industry in the same stimulus package  NickB79   Feb-03-09 12:33 PM   #1 
  - Indeed. No new roads. Fix the ones we have and let it go at that n/t  eridani   Feb-03-09 09:13 PM   #8 
  - Ack, it gets even worse: tax credits to buy new cars added to stimulus package  NickB79   Feb-04-09 01:35 AM   #10 
  - To be truly green, you would only upgrade to more energy-efficient stuff  kestrel91316   Feb-03-09 12:33 PM   #2 
  - Reminds me of something our AC sales dude said...  phantom power   Feb-03-09 12:36 PM   #3 
  - I read everything James Howard Kunstler writes and one of the  jwirr   Feb-03-09 12:37 PM   #4 
  - Too bad Alec Dubro cannot cite that Americans are driving more miles  Kolesar   Feb-03-09 12:43 PM   #5 
  - Here is one link with a graph of miles driven per year in the US since 1980  NickB79   Feb-04-09 01:26 AM   #9 
     - 32% population increase while miles traveled increased 88%  Kolesar   Feb-04-09 09:12 AM   #11 
  - K&R  XemaSab   Feb-03-09 03:22 PM   #6 
  - Amen.  Gregorian   Feb-03-09 09:12 PM   #7 
  - I love this article  XemaSab   Feb-08-09 06:05 PM   #12 
  - "there is simply no way to maintain both the atmosphere and personal transportation."  GliderGuider   Feb-08-09 09:32 PM   #13 
  - Working from home could significantly reduce traffic...  spin   Feb-09-09 12:51 AM   #14 
     - "The employees activity could easy be monitored by a supervisor from his/her home."  The2ndWheel   Feb-09-09 10:42 AM   #15 
     - Office drone, whatever you do on your office computer...  spin   Feb-09-09 06:04 PM   #16 
        - Exactly  The2ndWheel   Feb-09-09 08:02 PM   #18 
           - Changing our status as wage slaves...  spin   Feb-09-09 10:39 PM   #19 
     - It doesn't even require a home office.  Xithras   Feb-09-09 06:17 PM   #17 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC