Dead_Parrot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-09-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
| 17. "even worse than climate change"? |
| -Nuclear reactors will cost twice estimate, says E.ON chief |
bananas |
May-08-08 12:35 PM |
#0 |
 -
That's fine, it's well worth it |
Pawel K |
May-08-08 12:39 PM |
#1 |
 -
I hope they don't ask to bury nukyuler waste in your yard. |
louis-t |
May-08-08 12:55 PM |
#2 |
 -
They don't bury it in anyone's backyard, so I don't get your point |
Pawel K |
May-08-08 01:37 PM |
#4 |
| -
Most of the waste in MI is stored near the Great Lakes. |
louis-t |
May-08-08 05:42 PM |
#9 |
| -
Sorry, but nuclear waste is NOT short term anything |
FREEWILL56 |
May-10-08 02:33 AM |
#29 |
| -
Not if it turns into an expensive boondoggle |
bananas |
May-08-08 01:29 PM |
#3 |
| -
I don't see how providing clean energy can turn in to a boondoggle |
Pawel K |
May-08-08 01:40 PM |
#5 |
| -
Whoops! WPPSS "customers will continue paying for those uncompleted plants through 2021" |
bananas |
May-08-08 04:13 PM |
#6 |
| -
Here's another example - Oregon's first and only nuclear power plant |
bananas |
May-08-08 04:57 PM |
#7 |
| -
$112 billion in stranded costs for 110 canceled US nuclear plants = boondoggle |
jpak |
May-08-08 05:22 PM |
#8 |
| -
Nucular energy is not clean. |
losthills |
May-08-08 07:53 PM |
#10 |
| -
That was *just* like kicking a wasps nest! |
Nihil |
May-09-08 08:05 AM |
#11 |
| -
It is better to go with wind, solar, geothermal, and wave/current/tidal. |
kristopher |
May-09-08 08:19 AM |
#12 |
| -
Yeah, because climate is nothing scary, really. |
Dead_Parrot |
May-09-08 08:24 AM |
#13 |
| -
If you've read my posts (and I know you have) |
kristopher |
May-09-08 08:37 AM |
#14 |
| -
Hmmm. |
Dead_Parrot |
May-09-08 08:56 AM |
#16 |
| -
Every crackpot with a pet technology is crawling out of the woodwork |
kristopher |
May-09-08 09:18 AM |
#20 |
| -
Ok, point by point: |
Dead_Parrot |
May-09-08 10:08 AM |
#22 |
| -
Here's my comment on that thread - PP left out an important paragraph... |
jpak |
May-09-08 03:02 PM |
#28 |
| -
"nuclear has already failed once." |
FREEWILL56 |
May-10-08 02:54 AM |
#31 |
| -
Nuclear power can't and won't solve global warming. |
losthills |
May-09-08 08:41 AM |
#15 |
| -
"even worse than climate change"? |
Dead_Parrot |
May-09-08 08:56 AM |
#17 |
| -
Yeah. A lot worse. |
losthills |
May-09-08 09:03 AM |
#18 |
| -
Now there's a man who's never googled "canfield ocean". nt |
Dead_Parrot |
May-09-08 09:08 AM |
#19 |
| -
Does this look "clean" or "carbon free." |
losthills |
May-09-08 09:20 AM |
#21 |
| -
OK, so still haven't googled "Canfield Ocean" |
Dead_Parrot |
May-09-08 10:26 AM |
#23 |
| -
Google "Snake Oil Salesman." |
losthills |
May-09-08 10:44 AM |
#24 |
| -
why doe solar power help address global warming better than nuclear? |
phantom power |
May-09-08 10:48 AM |
#25 |
| -
Nuclear power plants require a continuous supply of fuel, |
losthills |
May-09-08 02:24 PM |
#27 |
| -
Again, Fail. |
Dead_Parrot |
May-09-08 10:54 AM |
#26 |
| -
Billions are not being spent in solar research and I'll say more research |
FREEWILL56 |
May-10-08 02:49 AM |
#30 |
| -
Here's an interesting chart: |
Dead_Parrot |
May-10-08 06:27 AM |
#32 |
| -
I thought this was supposed to be interesting? |
losthills |
May-10-08 09:35 AM |
#33 |
| -
It's called "data" |
Dead_Parrot |
May-10-08 03:37 PM |
#34 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread