You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #13: Maybe you'd like to start atmospheric nuclear testing again [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Maybe you'd like to start atmospheric nuclear testing again
Rare species will move in as humans die off or move underground.
It would be heaven on earth for Deep Ecologists!
And you wonder why I don't take you guys seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Construction of new shelter for Chernobyl falls 7 years behind bananas  Aug-01-07 06:54 PM   #0 
  - Oh. Oh.  NNadir   Aug-01-07 06:57 PM   #1 
  - The permanent shelter for dangerous fossil fuel waste  Pigwidgeon   Aug-01-07 11:57 PM   #2 
     - Right ... so following that thought ...  Nihil   Aug-02-07 08:06 AM   #5 
  - That's cool...  losthills   Aug-02-07 12:05 AM   #3 
  - Spoken like a true peace activist  Pigwidgeon   Aug-02-07 12:50 AM   #4 
     - This line was deliciously ironic  GliderGuider   Aug-02-07 08:15 AM   #6 
        - It was predictable, though  Pigwidgeon   Aug-02-07 10:54 AM   #7 
        - Indeed. We'll be playing whack-a-mole with that biker chick story til the end of time.  phantom power   Aug-02-07 10:58 AM   #8 
        - I think seveso did  Dead_Parrot   Aug-02-07 04:48 PM   #19 
        - If you're this gleeful over Chernobyl, you should be overjoyed with global warming  bananas   Aug-02-07 03:14 PM   #9 
        - Climate change is driving a mass extinction. Chernobyl didn't.  phantom power   Aug-02-07 03:24 PM   #11 
           - Post-Chernobyl genetic disaster in Belarus  bananas   Aug-02-07 03:40 PM   #12 
           - I overstepped myself. Chernobyl caused birth defects.  phantom power   Aug-02-07 05:14 PM   #22 
           - correction  Greyskye   Aug-02-07 07:40 PM   #24 
           - No shit??  losthills   Aug-02-07 09:40 PM   #28 
           - It's not clear to me whether the major effects were perhaps not mutagenic, or rather teratogenic  GliderGuider   Aug-03-07 08:59 AM   #35 
           - Maybe you'd like to start atmospheric nuclear testing again  bananas   Aug-02-07 03:46 PM   #13 
           - I think you know that I disapprove of nuclear weaponry.  phantom power   Aug-02-07 05:10 PM   #21 
           - Bay Area teen now thankful for Chernobyl birth defects  bananas   Aug-02-07 04:18 PM   #15 
           - Slate Magazine photo essay "Chernobyl Legacy"  bananas   Aug-02-07 04:35 PM   #16 
              - thank you for that link  Greyskye   Aug-02-07 07:44 PM   #25 
              - Why?  Nihil   Aug-03-07 04:32 AM   #32 
              - That's a very, very powerful photo essay.  GliderGuider   Aug-02-07 08:20 PM   #27 
                 - Coal plants fail safe?!  Dead_Parrot   Aug-02-07 11:57 PM   #31 
                    - You mistake my point  GliderGuider   Aug-03-07 05:55 AM   #33 
                       - Ahh, wrong end of stick  Dead_Parrot   Aug-03-07 06:41 AM   #34 
        - Anyone who "rubs his hands and chortles gleefully" over this is sick.  bananas   Aug-02-07 03:18 PM   #10 
        - On subjects like this you'll find me to be a fairly consistent contrarian.  GliderGuider   Aug-02-07 04:42 PM   #18 
        - Rebounding because humans have abandoned the area  jpak   Aug-02-07 03:57 PM   #14 
           - Actually, there *are* people still there  Dead_Parrot   Aug-02-07 04:36 PM   #17 
           - Perhaps they can export that wholesome food to NZ for school lunches  jpak   Aug-02-07 04:54 PM   #20 
           - this also shows...  Greyskye   Aug-02-07 07:49 PM   #26 
              - Yes.  Dead_Parrot   Aug-02-07 11:38 PM   #30 
                 - I see.  Greyskye   Aug-03-07 10:38 AM   #36 
                    - No, you don't see. That isn't it at all.  phantom power   Aug-03-07 11:05 AM   #37 
                       - That is simply wrong.  losthills   Aug-03-07 06:42 PM   #40 
                          - Yes, dammit!  Dead_Parrot   Aug-05-07 04:43 AM   #42 
           - "Genetic Damage" oh what a crock.  hunter   Aug-02-07 11:04 PM   #29 
  - Rare birds and brave humans...  losthills   Aug-02-07 06:37 PM   #23 
     - Again, how do you define "genetic damage?"  hunter   Aug-03-07 01:39 PM   #38 
        - "Very High Mutation Rate in Offspring of Chernobyl Accident Liquidators"  jpak   Aug-03-07 02:01 PM   #39 
           - And?  hunter   Aug-05-07 02:29 AM   #41 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC