Mairead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
| 29. So let me try it from a different angle |
|
Where did Smirk's 'electability' come from? He's a consistent failure, a diagnosable psychopath, a drunk, a druggie, a virtual military deserter. This was all available, but not brought out by Media Inc. Media Inc all but anointed him on day one of his 'campaign', instead. He was eventually declared the winner by his daddy's cronies, who violated their oaths of office to do it. He was shoved down our throats in a very, very blatant way.
Was he 'electable'? What does the term even mean to you? The ability to be sold like a package of breakfast food? Wealthy and connected to Organised Crime (Political Branch)? A member of the corporatocracy? Someone our rulers are willing to shove down our throats? It must mean something, but what?
|
| -Electability is a Red Herring Issue |
dpbrown |
Sep-26-03 03:03 PM |
#0 |
 -
Well, get him a haircut then. |
TioDiego |
Sep-26-03 03:08 PM |
#1 |
  -
Because good hair == good leadership |
no name no slogan |
Sep-26-03 03:16 PM |
#4 |
| -
so am I |
JohnKleeb |
Sep-26-03 04:01 PM |
#8 |
| -
Electibility is the ONLY issue |
Maple |
Sep-26-03 03:09 PM |
#2 |
| -
And Bush, the fraud who stole the White House, won't BE elected |
dpbrown |
Sep-26-03 03:16 PM |
#3 |
| -
AMEN!!! |
molly |
Sep-27-03 06:12 AM |
#26 |
| -
electability is critical, especially . . . |
OneBlueSky |
Sep-26-03 03:36 PM |
#5 |
| -
We stop the hijacking of our electoral heritage by stopping it |
dpbrown |
Sep-26-03 03:52 PM |
#6 |
| -
I got on the phone and talked to 20 people |
diamondsoul |
Sep-26-03 04:13 PM |
#11 |
| -
There's something a little insane about |
Mairead |
Sep-27-03 03:17 AM |
#23 |
| -
Electsbility is, indeed, of PRIMARY importance... |
Rowdyboy |
Sep-26-03 03:53 PM |
#7 |
| -
Bush won't get as many votes as he did last time, and he lost then |
dpbrown |
Sep-26-03 04:04 PM |
#9 |
| -
We'll just have to agree to disagree... |
Rowdyboy |
Sep-26-03 04:13 PM |
#10 |
| -
5 of 18 is almost 30% of the 20th Century Presidents, not "rare" at all |
dpbrown |
Sep-26-03 04:54 PM |
#12 |
| -
Electability is a false notion... |
lams712 |
Sep-26-03 05:06 PM |
#13 |
| -
Excellent point - winning elections IS electable by definition |
dpbrown |
Sep-26-03 05:12 PM |
#14 |
| -
Hey, did anyone give you a "Welcome to DU" yet? |
revcarol |
Sep-26-03 11:18 PM |
#19 |
| -
Please. |
stickdog |
Sep-26-03 07:56 PM |
#15 |
| -
You completely miss the point by taking this narrow perspective |
dpbrown |
Sep-26-03 09:14 PM |
#16 |
| -
A lot of Democrats could beat Bush. |
stickdog |
Sep-26-03 09:58 PM |
#17 |
| -
"Doubt" is a red herring issue |
dpbrown |
Sep-27-03 12:02 AM |
#20 |
| -
Ever heard of the verb "to Wellstone", as in |
stickdog |
Sep-27-03 12:51 AM |
#22 |
| -
Those are all bogus scare tactics |
dpbrown |
Sep-27-03 03:20 AM |
#24 |
| -
Actually |
Padraig18 |
Sep-27-03 07:11 AM |
#28 |
| -
My mistake - ANOTHER one-term Republican |
dpbrown |
Sep-29-03 10:01 AM |
#30 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-27-03 03:52 AM |
#25 |
| -
Well then I'm not very bright either |
clar |
Sep-27-03 06:38 AM |
#27 |
| -
So let me try it from a different angle |
Mairead |
Sep-27-03 08:57 AM |
#29 |
| -
"Electability is a Red Herring Issue"? what? |
Feanorcurufinwe |
Sep-26-03 10:36 PM |
#18 |
| -
Bush lost last time |
dpbrown |
Sep-27-03 12:12 AM |
#21 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread