You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: He did do great - but he needs to fine tune the message - [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-03 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. He did do great - but he needs to fine tune the message -
The You want to cut Social Security is based on the fact that in 1995 he heard another respond on what was needed for SS - and the fellow indicated that our pay as you go SS funding would need - if funding remained the current wage capped payroll tax - a change in the "normal retirement age" - perhaps to age 70, certainly to 68 from the Reagan set age of 67 (folks have forgotten how Reagan raised the retirement age - and it will be good politics to remind them). Dean sain he agreed. He has since gone to changing the funding method - by removing the wage cap on payroll taxes. The folks in the AARP understand this - I do not see how he is hurt - except in "media versus Gore" way - meaning that the media will try to screw him on this - but they are RW and and would have done so anyway. - But he needs a better response. Honesy does not sell to the whore press.

You want to cut Medicare and agree with Newt Gingrich - comes from his 1995 agreement with the GOP goal in 95 of reducing the growth medicare medical costs from a 10% growth each year to 7% growth (Gingrich claimed a $270 B "savings" would result, There were no details as I recall, so it was motherhood - and indeed as a Clintonian pragmatist, why not be in favor of the obvious?) - But again the snappy one liner would help.

The yes I endorse free trade and Nafta answer needs an explanation that Nafta sucked except that it saved a world wide economic crisis that would have occurred if Mexico was allowed to go under - yet after its success in saving Mexico, NAFTA is now screwing Mexico as our Farm welfare payment to the major Farm corporations (and God bless that a little of the money does get down to family farms - but that is not the reason the GOP passed it) are destroying farming in Mexico. Indeed that is the reason for the Cancun 26 demanding the US/EU/ and Japan end export prices that are little more than real cost less tax subsidy (I believe beef in the EU prices out at "cost less $2 per day per cow before slaugter" - a great way to teach small countries how we believe in the market pricing model).

I think Dean - and all the others - need to fine tune their message, but I also think Dean did great! - a "Clintonian pragmatist"!

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC