You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: I interpret it differently [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. I interpret it differently
When Dean talks about something being heinous, it was that the man got off because the witness refused to testify. I don't think he was denying that the man had a right to appeal and win another trial. What needs to be done in cases of rape, imho, is for testimony to be taped so that if, for some reason, another trial is called, the witness doesn't have to go through it all again. If there are objections from the defense, written questions/answers could be submitted to the jury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC