Reply #31: Well there's a reason.

[dmallind]

Here are a selection - a significant portion even - of your posts. All of them were first reactions to others in that they form your first entry in a specific subthread. They predate then any "attacks" on you from those responded to.

From your post it's fairly obvious that you don't understand the economics, so how do you expect others to understand it?

You don't seem to want to understand the simple reality of that simple point. You seem to want to blame Obama more than you want to blame Republicans.

Neither the fact that you think you have "been told ad nauseum" nor that you use the word "ubiquitous" are impressive

I'm having a hard time believing that you just realized that you had
this thought.


You're saying that no one should express their opinion in favor of the Obama administration because if they do they're somehow interfering with your right to express your opinion?

That makes no sense at all. Why waste your time on such nonsense? If your opinion is just and sound then why don't you make your case and let it stand on its own, instead of resorting to silliness like this cartoon?



Now I for one am not telling you you should not or cannot be argumentative or insulting. I can be both plenty of the time myself. From a quick perusal of your posts I suspect we even agree about most things, especially a lack of consideration for what is feasible and the ridiculous nature of rabid anti-Obamaism.

But even if I agree with you in all respects, and even if I have been more aggressive than you have, it's not my 1000+ "status" that is the difference here. It's that I am not whining about people disagreeing with me in a similarly aggressive manner. If you dish it out, you can't complain when the dish gets served back.