You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: What constitutes "sexual Assault child" in TX? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. What constitutes "sexual Assault child" in TX?
Edited on Wed Apr-28-10 02:19 PM by Gormy Cuss
Here's a brief summary.
The crime of sexual assault as it applies to a child younger than 17 mirrors the adult sexual assault statute, except it removes the notion of consent. A person commits the offense of sexual assault against a child if he or she:

(1) causes the penetration of the anus or sexual organ of a child younger than 17 years of age by any means;

(2) causes the penetration of the mouth of a child younger than 17 years of age by the sexual organ of the actor;

(3) causes the sexual organ of a child younger than 17 years of age to contact or penetrate the mouth, anus, or sexual organ of another person, including the actor;

(4) causes the anus of a child younger than 17 years of age to contact the mouth, anus, or sexual organ of another person, including the actor; or

(5) causes the mouth of a child younger than 17 years of age to contact the anus or sexual organ of another person, including the actor.

As compared to sexual assaults involving adults, consent is absolutely and wholly irrelevant....


In your example, Mr. Gaudreau was ~20-21 at conviction -- young enough to think teenagers are dating material. What remains unsaid in the sex offender summary is whether his conviction was based on consensual sex with a 16 year old, because the law excludes consent in the determination, or whether it was with a much younger child. While he was guilty of the offense either way an idiot unaware that sex with a 16 year old can land him in jail is not as worrisome as a community risk as someone who rapes a 5 year old.

eta clarification
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC