DerekG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-04-09 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
| 46. It helps that Daniel Craig is a grown man |
|
If you have to replace Shatner, fine. But don't use a goddamn kid.
|
| -Ok so I watched that new Star Trek movie and I have this to ask... ** spoilers ** |
LynneSin |
Dec-03-09 02:45 PM |
#0 |
 -
sure, why not? |
Flaxbee |
Dec-03-09 03:13 PM |
#1 |
  -
I'm not any kind of Trekkie, probably haven't seen the original series in years |
LynneSin |
Dec-03-09 03:17 PM |
#3 |
| -
I've heard many rumors about the sequel, hopefully they'll |
Flaxbee |
Dec-03-09 03:20 PM |
#5 |
| -
The death of Amanda, Spock's mother, needs some explaining, as she made an |
Mist |
Dec-03-09 07:08 PM |
#23 |
| -
I would like to know how future Romulan managed to make that happen. |
rcrush |
Dec-03-09 03:15 PM |
#2 |
| -
I thought about that |
LynneSin |
Dec-03-09 03:21 PM |
#6 |
| -
Somehow Nero blowing up Kirk Sr's ship caused Uhura to fall in love with Spock at the academy. |
rcrush |
Dec-03-09 03:31 PM |
#9 |
| -
You are right about the alternative universe. |
rebel with a cause |
Dec-03-09 09:01 PM |
#37 |
| -
Butterfly wings |
Dr. Strange |
Dec-03-09 03:17 PM |
#4 |
| -
This thread can't be said to exist until Deja Q posts about how much he hates the movie |
Orrex |
Dec-03-09 03:23 PM |
#7 |
| -
I just read an interview with Ridley Scott. |
Dr. Strange |
Dec-03-09 03:40 PM |
#10 |
| -
Maybe I won't wait until Xmas to give you your present. |
Orrex |
Dec-03-09 06:29 PM |
#20 |
| -
It's a Festivus miracle! |
Dr. Strange |
Dec-03-09 09:44 PM |
#40 |
| -
You know, that link went to the vid for the "accu" model. |
Orrex |
Dec-03-09 09:46 PM |
#41 |
| -
If only Harlan Ellison had written it, Spock would've grabbed Uhura's breasts |
PVnRT |
Dec-03-09 04:28 PM |
#14 |
| -
Teehehehehehe... |
Deja Q |
Dec-03-09 07:28 PM |
#26 |
| -
By the way, did you watch it in the jury room? |
Orrex |
Dec-03-09 03:26 PM |
#8 |
| -
Star Trek 2 |
pokerfan |
Dec-03-09 03:40 PM |
#11 |
| -
RODDEN BERREEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!! |
sarge43 |
Dec-03-09 04:37 PM |
#15 |
| -
LMAO |
eShirl |
Dec-03-09 07:35 PM |
#29 |
| -
Remember the time line was changed. |
sarge43 |
Dec-03-09 03:54 PM |
#12 |
| -
Women got the short shrift in this film. Big Time. Black actors had some key roles, |
Captain Hilts |
Dec-03-09 03:55 PM |
#13 |
| -
Abrams is already on the hot plate for not hewing to canon. Can you imagine |
hedgehog |
Dec-03-09 06:40 PM |
#22 |
| -
New characters were introduced - such as the court martial panel - where it would have been nice |
Captain Hilts |
Dec-03-09 08:25 PM |
#31 |
| -
Do you know that was Tyler Perry's first move that wasn't one of those 'Tyler Perry' movies he makes |
LynneSin |
Dec-03-09 11:41 PM |
#43 |
| -
Because Abrams is creating a whole new different timeline because he's an uncreative shitbag |
Rabrrrrrr |
Dec-03-09 04:43 PM |
#16 |
| -
And Casino Royale sucks for the same reason too, right? |
Orrex |
Dec-03-09 06:12 PM |
#17 |
| -
Um - Casino Royale is a James Bond book/films |
Rabrrrrrr |
Dec-03-09 06:14 PM |
#18 |
| -
Um... It's relevant because it's a reboot in a de facto alternate universe with ties to the "prime" |
Orrex |
Dec-03-09 06:22 PM |
#19 |
| -
But Casino Royale was written by Ian Fleming. |
wickerwoman |
Dec-03-09 06:30 PM |
#21 |
| -
I don't know... |
Orrex |
Dec-03-09 08:45 PM |
#33 |
| -
My issue with Abrams' Trek |
wickerwoman |
Dec-03-09 09:03 PM |
#38 |
| -
Abram's abandonment of Federation principles is my biggest gripe. |
Kutjara |
Dec-04-09 12:53 AM |
#47 |
| -
It seems to me that you're condensing the time line too much |
wysimdnwyg |
Dec-04-09 10:17 AM |
#49 |
| -
But even in TOS. |
wickerwoman |
Dec-04-09 02:48 PM |
#51 |
| -
I can't believe I'm going to perpetuate this, but... |
wysimdnwyg |
Dec-04-09 03:47 PM |
#52 |
| -
You make interesting points. |
Kutjara |
Dec-04-09 05:54 PM |
#53 |
| -
A partial reboot; given the silliness and jive nonsense that was too outlandish in the 1990s... |
Deja Q |
Dec-03-09 07:32 PM |
#28 |
| -
Bond was rebooted because it was getting silly; rebooted back to what it WAS |
Rabrrrrrr |
Dec-03-09 08:08 PM |
#30 |
| -
Bond was silly for a long, long time. |
Orrex |
Dec-03-09 08:31 PM |
#32 |
| -
Yes, it was silly - that's why I said "partway through Moore's tenure" |
Rabrrrrrr |
Dec-03-09 11:37 PM |
#42 |
| -
I think Brosnan was intended to be a blend of Dalton and Moore |
pokerfan |
Dec-04-09 09:43 AM |
#48 |
| -
It helps that Daniel Craig is a grown man |
DerekG |
Dec-04-09 12:52 AM |
#46 |
| -
No, that one actually has depth and thought put into it... not to mention, |
Deja Q |
Dec-03-09 07:30 PM |
#27 |
| -
Don't mistake me--I really enjoyed Craig in the role and the film overall |
Orrex |
Dec-03-09 08:51 PM |
#34 |
| -
Yes! I was waiting for you! |
Deja Q |
Dec-03-09 07:27 PM |
#25 |
| -
I LOVE the rewrite, it ads a whole new dimension to the movie. |
DainBramaged |
Dec-03-09 07:16 PM |
#24 |
| -
I didn't think anyone could kill the Star Trek franchise |
MSchreader |
Dec-03-09 08:53 PM |
#35 |
| -
I downloaded a bootleg, |
kentauros |
Dec-03-09 08:58 PM |
#36 |
| -
Yeah, but it had LENS FLARES!!!!!! |
MilesColtrane |
Dec-04-09 12:37 AM |
#44 |
| -
Hey! How was the Punkin Chunkin championship? I didn't see you |
madinmaryland |
Dec-03-09 09:07 PM |
#39 |
| -
That Star Wars clone ain't my idea of Trek |
DerekG |
Dec-04-09 12:50 AM |
#45 |
| -
If nothing else... |
LanternWaste |
Dec-04-09 12:19 PM |
#50 |
| -
Well, yeah. As you note, it's a history rewrite. (spoilers) |
Orsino |
Dec-04-09 07:09 PM |
#54 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
