You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: Final Assignment - Compilation in Scheme [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Final Assignment - Compilation in Scheme
One thing that I must point out is that the compilation and machine
execution environment is very fragile and finicky. I discovered
that, sometimes, the environment is left in a strange state after
encountering bugs, such that, after fixing the bug bad behaviors
continue to occur, even though the bug has been fixed. I spent a
lot of time tracking down a subtle bug, then finally exiting scheme
and re-entering, only to find that the bug was no longer there.

More insidious and dangerous is the opposite behavior. A corrupt
environment can lead to correct behavior, even when bugs still
exist in the code. An example of this was when I discovered that
set-car! was left out of the list of primitive functions. I
modified eceval-support.scm to add it, reloaded machine-shell.scm,
ran it, and it worked! Then, I exited scheme, entered it again,
re-ran the same machine-shell, and got a new complaint that
set-cdr! was missing!!! How did it work before, after fixing only
set-car!? I have no idea.

I am suspecting that a lot of the testing I performed yesterday was
against a corrupt environment, because I was able to run s450.scm
successfully, even when some primitives were missing, and when
let->appl was not working properly. I know that I tested the
(define a 1) yesterday and saw it succeed, but this morning after
reading professor XXXX, retested and saw that it was
definitely broken. It is also possible that an error dropped me out
of the s450 environment and on to regular scheme where, naturally,
everything worked just fine... Who knows...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC