You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #46: There have been clear cases of ripoff one of which I will use as a negative to prove the positive... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. There have been clear cases of ripoff one of which I will use as a negative to prove the positive...
Edited on Sat Dec-06-08 09:03 PM by originalpckelly
Timbaland used a piece of music, a chiptune called Acidjazzed Evening, in the creation of Do It. It was proved that he had downloaded the song and the piece used is an exact duplicate of the song with an delay effect added. It is a clear example of copyright infringement, in which evidence supported the known and intentional infringement of Tempest's song Acidjazzed Evening.

It is an innocent duplication, of a very bland and indistinct melody. The arrangement of the two songs is different, the melody in one is played by a guitar, and in the other it's a vocal. And the melody of Satriani's work is not exactly the same as Coldplay's, it suggests that it's not an exact duplication.

The chord progression is also indistinct, and the instruments playing it are different.

Put yourself in the other position, what if you wrote something that someone else did on accident? Are you absolutely certain the melody you wrote in your composition is not duplicated unknown to yourself in other works? What if someone sued you for it, for all the profits you made off of it? But you didn't steal it, you really honestly accidentally wrote the same thing.

There cannot be a liability landmine or it will kill creativity.

I write music, but even though I merely attempt to be professional, I've had no success yet. I'm afraid one day I'll write something on accident that someone else wrote. I mean if the only definition of copyright is a melody that's almost similar and the same chord progression, then it's going to happen.

There are many dimensions to a piece of music, and those various dimensions should be considered in copyright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC