You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #88: I learned a bit more about Hatch's opposition. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
Benfea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. I learned a bit more about Hatch's opposition.
Apparently there was a planned remake that would have brought back many of the original characters in a "Next Generation" type remake that continued from the original series. They had already built half the sets and were a month away from shooting. The original actors were looking forward to reprising their roles, then the rug got pulled out from under them and the show was dropped. They shopped around for a new network to pick up the show, and Sci-Fi Channel expressed interest, then suddenly charged off in a completely different direction (thank goodness).

Having heard that story, I think I can understand why some of the original actors were ticked off, but some of their comments still annoyed me.

My jury is out on who exactly is the kid's dad--as a fairly new mommy, I was just in hormonal agony over Kara's situation--"Here--bond with the kid" yet trying to deny it. Kind of clouded my analytical thinking over who was zooming who in the situation. I also assumed that Sharon's baby was The First, not The Only, so it didn't bother me too much.

Actually, Kasey looks older than Sharon's baby, so if the Kasey is what Leoban claims, it would mean Sharon's baby wasn't the first at all, and if that's the case why did all the cylons go goo-goo the way they did over Sharon-Helo's baby?

Also, if Kasey was made the way Leoban claimed, it totally undermines the "babies only made from love" thing the writers spent so much time building up. It would also mean that the cylons can now start mass producing halfbreed babies as long as they have enough human captives (which New Caprica certainly provides), which would instantly make Sharon's baby a whole lot less important in the scheme of things.

PS-Regarding your other post--I think it's poetic justice that Cylons can't reproduce sexually. There's creating life, and then there's creating LIFE, if you know what I mean. Something that's just outside their grasp. I like that touch. :hi:

Actually, I hate the "babies made only from love" story. Sure, it gives nice warm and fuzzy feelings, but it's such incredibly bad science that it takes me out of the story. As I mentioned, human babies are (sadly) made without love all the time, and if the cylons understood biology/medicine enough to construct the "skinjob" cylon models, then they certainly had the expertise to build functioning genitals into them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC