You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: My school board had this programme... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
21. My school board had this programme...
This is when I was in highschool, so this is 20+ years ago, but...

Each Grade 10 class had planned parenthood class. One of the assignments in the class was to prepare a family budget including all the costs of raising a child.

We had to list all the costs, and budget for them:

clothes, food, books, entertainment, presents, injury/medical, babysitters, school supplies, trips, treats, dentistry, gasoline to/from school/events/etc, etc, etc, etc...

It worked out to be about $250,000 to raise each child from birth to age 18.

It was a real eye-opener to many of us. Particularly as I grew up in a predominantly Mennonite area, so many of my classmates wew planning to marry and procreate right out of highschool.

I bet having a hard look at what a child really costs is the best birth control of all.

Next to Birkenstocks, of course.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Are we bound to an ethical duty to have $ to raise a child ere having one? Rabrrrrrr  Mar-24-06 11:02 PM   #0 
  - Sounds like a utopian idea to me!  tjdee   Mar-24-06 11:08 PM   #1 
  - An interesting question I hadn't considered...  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-24-06 11:10 PM   #2 
     - Also, why assume that the only "means" one has is financial?  tjdee   Mar-24-06 11:18 PM   #3 
        - Another good question, but one I'm not asking in this thread.  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-24-06 11:30 PM   #4 
  - These are dangerous waters  XemaSab   Mar-24-06 11:36 PM   #5 
  - Yes, and I said specifically in my post that I am not talking about  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-24-06 11:42 PM   #6 
     - I think too often people confuse money  XemaSab   Mar-24-06 11:49 PM   #7 
        - And again, that's something I'm not talking about at all.  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-24-06 11:50 PM   #8 
           - Going back and reading the OP  XemaSab   Mar-24-06 11:54 PM   #10 
  - It's not that easy.  Floogeldy   Mar-24-06 11:53 PM   #9 
  - All desire is controllable. To say otherwise is to offer an excuse.  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-24-06 11:55 PM   #11 
  - BTW, this post is an attack on welfare.  Floogeldy   Mar-24-06 11:56 PM   #12 
  - Define 'welfare'  HypnoToad   Mar-25-06 08:23 AM   #41 
     - I can say this . . . .  Floogeldy   Mar-25-06 08:49 PM   #91 
  - No, "we" are not bound to wait for the $  Nicole   Mar-25-06 12:06 AM   #13 
  - GD is upstairs and to the left  Droopy   Mar-25-06 12:09 AM   #14 
  - I've never responded to you at all on this thread.  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-25-06 12:13 AM   #15 
  - Well,  Droopy   Mar-25-06 12:21 AM   #20 
  - I don't see how you came to that, Droopy.  CanuckAmok   Mar-25-06 12:39 AM   #24 
     - Do you think  Droopy   Mar-25-06 12:44 AM   #25 
        - Well, if you're asking *me*...  CanuckAmok   Mar-25-06 12:51 AM   #26 
           - I can understand that  Droopy   Mar-25-06 12:56 AM   #27 
  - I had my daughter when I was not really...  Katherine Brengle   Mar-25-06 12:14 AM   #16 
  - I agree with that. I found myself pregnant while working temp jobs and  radwriter0555   Mar-25-06 12:26 AM   #22 
     - Excellent post!  Katherine Brengle   Mar-25-06 09:01 AM   #48 
  - So basically you're against rednecks breeding?  Revolutionary_Acts04   Mar-25-06 12:16 AM   #17 
  - I try not to use the word "rednecks"  TallahasseeGrannie   Mar-25-06 12:34 PM   #79 
  - It's actually a very good question..  Zenzic   Mar-25-06 12:17 AM   #18 
  - Well, if a teen has a baby, do you think they should be punished for not  radwriter0555   Mar-25-06 12:18 AM   #19 
  - Here's a utopian idea...  CanuckAmok   Mar-25-06 12:37 AM   #23 
  - Wow - you didn't really read my post, did you?  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-25-06 01:47 AM   #29 
  - lol you didn't read my answer!  radwriter0555   Mar-25-06 02:03 AM   #30 
     - I did read your answer, and it was an answer to a question I didn't ask,  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-25-06 09:00 AM   #47 
        - You're right, I didn't answer it properly... you're entirely correct... so  radwriter0555   Mar-25-06 12:18 PM   #77 
  - Accidents are not always so rare  Alleycat   Mar-25-06 12:47 PM   #80 
     - Well apparently she found something she's good at... having kids.. It may  radwriter0555   Mar-25-06 05:04 PM   #88 
        - .  rug   Mar-25-06 06:42 PM   #89 
  - My school board had this programme...  CanuckAmok   Mar-25-06 12:25 AM   #21 
  - You can rarely "afford" a child, because there are no "generic children"  SoCalDem   Mar-25-06 01:02 AM   #28 
  - Correct.  Iniquitous Bunny   Mar-25-06 05:41 AM   #33 
  - I think if most people waited until they were financially capable  fishwax   Mar-25-06 02:26 AM   #31 
  - Interesting question  Iniquitous Bunny   Mar-25-06 05:29 AM   #32 
  - Do We Have An Ethical Duty To Have the $ To Care For a Pet if We Have One?  REP   Mar-25-06 05:42 AM   #34 
  - Good analogy!  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-25-06 08:45 AM   #43 
  - So would we eliminate student loans? If you can't afford to  HopeLives   Mar-25-06 06:34 AM   #35 
  - I think most people would agree with your basic point ...  Laelth   Mar-25-06 06:58 AM   #36 
  - A child can have a good life, even without a lot of money.  philosophie_en_rose   Mar-25-06 08:04 AM   #37 
  - Yes. Money compensates for factors in the wild.  HypnoToad   Mar-25-06 08:14 AM   #38 
  - Stupid, classist question.  rug   Mar-25-06 08:21 AM   #39 
  - "Begs the larger question"  Boojatta   Mar-25-06 02:26 PM   #83 
  - Have you seen this one?  rug   Mar-25-06 02:37 PM   #85 
     - It is self-described as "a thoroughly uninteresting Web site."  Boojatta   Mar-25-06 02:55 PM   #86 
  - ?  Boojatta   Mar-25-06 02:26 PM   #84 
  - so, what? you want we should just starve all those poor kids?  anarch   Mar-25-06 08:23 AM   #40 
  - Egads! And your question is even more dastardly than mine!  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-25-06 08:53 AM   #45 
  - Yes, all of us do  new_beawr   Mar-25-06 08:26 AM   #42 
  - That's a brilliant question!  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-25-06 08:56 AM   #46 
  - Are we talking basic needs or $100 brand name shoes?  miss_american_pie   Mar-25-06 08:47 AM   #44 
  - I believe that you should accept the consequences  Alleycat   Mar-25-06 09:03 AM   #49 
  - This is an interesting question.  Midlodemocrat   Mar-25-06 09:12 AM   #50 
  - I read a science fiction story once  China_cat   Mar-25-06 09:46 AM   #51 
  - I would feel ethically obligated but  paul_fromatlanta   Mar-25-06 09:53 AM   #52 
  - DOE - $80 billion for student loans in 2006. The taxpayers could save  HopeLives   Mar-25-06 10:06 AM   #53 
  - And only the rich would be educated.  rug   Mar-25-06 10:34 AM   #54 
     - Only the rich would have kids according to this logic. n/t  HopeLives   Mar-25-06 10:39 AM   #55 
        - Not neccesarily  Alleycat   Mar-25-06 10:46 AM   #58 
        - According to what logic? What logical system in this thread  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-25-06 11:06 AM   #60 
           - It's a logical extension of the argument that it is unethical to have  HopeLives   Mar-25-06 11:28 AM   #64 
              - College is not the parents responsibility  Alleycat   Mar-25-06 11:42 AM   #68 
              - And I don't include that as part of the responsibility of a parent.  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-25-06 11:42 AM   #69 
                 - I don't think a parent's responsibility stops at HS graduation.  HopeLives   Mar-25-06 03:32 PM   #87 
  - No, and to suggest so is ridiculous  JustDoIt   Mar-25-06 10:43 AM   #56 
  - Do you draw line anywhere?  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-25-06 11:10 AM   #62 
     - Well good thing that you are just a tiny minority  JustDoIt   Mar-25-06 11:26 AM   #63 
        - Wow. I'm anti-children. I never knew that.  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-25-06 11:37 AM   #66 
           - So  JustDoIt   Mar-25-06 11:43 AM   #70 
           - I could likely be that person - I don't think we should get tax  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-25-06 11:44 AM   #71 
              - Those children  JustDoIt   Mar-25-06 11:45 AM   #72 
                 - Wow, nice non sequitor.  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-25-06 11:46 AM   #73 
           - I'll back you up on that one.  xmas74   Mar-25-06 12:11 PM   #74 
              - Thanks! I am most definitely very PRO-child,  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-25-06 12:15 PM   #76 
                 - You are quite welcome!  xmas74   Mar-25-06 12:25 PM   #78 
  - As individuals yes,  supernova   Mar-25-06 10:45 AM   #57 
  - Am I too late for popcorn?  Hardhead   Mar-25-06 10:49 AM   #59 
  - Apart from a couple here, this thread has remained popcorn free,  Rabrrrrrr   Mar-25-06 11:08 AM   #61 
  - It depends on what your idea of "enough "is  Lydia Leftcoast   Mar-25-06 11:35 AM   #65 
  - I think the welfare of the child should be first thing on the mind of  nytemare   Mar-25-06 11:41 AM   #67 
  - It sounds good in theory, but...  Left Is Write   Mar-25-06 12:12 PM   #75 
  - So many thoughts come to mind here  TallahasseeGrannie   Mar-25-06 12:54 PM   #81 
  - If we all waited to have children when we could 'afford' it  RadFemFL   Mar-25-06 01:59 PM   #82 
  - No, Absolutely Not  Crisco   Mar-25-06 06:50 PM   #90 
  - to have children without being able to afford college for them  lionesspriyanka   Mar-25-06 08:51 PM   #92 
  - Don't forget Graduate School.  rug   Mar-25-06 09:02 PM   #94 
     - nope my morality limit is college  lionesspriyanka   Mar-25-06 09:05 PM   #95 
  - No, you muddle along and do the best you can. That's the human  Redstone   Mar-25-06 08:53 PM   #93 
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC