MrModerate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-12-05 12:03 AM
Response to Original message |
| 61. No, no, no -- the real question is: WHO CARES? |
|
I mean, we are talking about Prince Charle de Wales here, a man who has singlehandedly reinvented the concept of irrelevancy for the 21st Century in a way that gives it startling new depth and meaning.
|
| -(PHOTO) The BIG question about Prince Charles... |
bob_weaver |
Feb-11-05 05:11 PM |
#0 |
-
LOVE |
Laura PackYourBags |
Feb-11-05 05:12 PM |
#1 |
 -
Then why didn't he just marry Camilla instead of Diana in the first place? |
bob_weaver |
Feb-11-05 05:19 PM |
#9 |
-
Probably because the prevailing mindset was much like yours... |
OneMoreDemocrat |
Feb-11-05 05:22 PM |
#12 |
 -
But he's the Prince of Wales fer chrissakes, he can marry who he wants to |
bob_weaver |
Feb-11-05 05:31 PM |
#23 |
-
Well, no, I think precisely because he IS the Prince Of Wales |
Left Is Write |
Feb-11-05 11:29 PM |
#54 |
-
He wasn't permitted to |
Lorien |
Feb-11-05 05:25 PM |
#16 |
 -
What kind of society does not allow you to marry who you love? Oh yeah, |
bob_weaver |
Feb-11-05 11:28 PM |
#52 |
-
Wasn't she married at the time to someone else? |
Ruffhowse |
Feb-11-05 05:49 PM |
#32 |
-
EXACTLY n/t |
Godlesscommieprevert |
Feb-11-05 08:33 PM |
#51 |
-
Then why didn't Camilla divorce & marry Charles? Diana would be alive now! |
bob_weaver |
Feb-11-05 11:29 PM |
#53 |
-
Not when they met and supposedly first fell in love. Married later. |
RadicalMom |
Feb-12-05 05:22 AM |
#65 |
-
Y'know ... those almost look like reversed 'before' and 'after' pics ... |
hippiechick |
Feb-11-05 05:13 PM |
#2 |
-
ROTFL |
malaise |
Feb-11-05 05:13 PM |
#3 |
 -
CAMILLA does look like a horsey face trollop!! |
pbartch |
Feb-11-05 07:19 PM |
#45 |
-
Is the implication |
Dookus |
Feb-11-05 05:14 PM |
#4 |
-
I REALLY don't want come off sounding |
DIKB |
Feb-11-05 05:14 PM |
#5 |
 -
"but will a supermodel do THIS ?" |
BlueEyedSon |
Feb-11-05 05:24 PM |
#15 |
  -
Most supermodels are hopelessly insecure |
Lorien |
Feb-11-05 05:31 PM |
#24 |
   -
Your cats are beautiful, especially the first one! nt |
BlueEyedSon |
Feb-11-05 06:11 PM |
#36 |
   -
And most are freakishly unappealing |
Vektor |
Feb-12-05 02:59 AM |
#63 |
  -
One summer in Tokyo, I lived in a rooming house whose residents |
Lydia Leftcoast |
Feb-12-05 10:06 AM |
#73 |
  -
Right - |
Vektor |
Feb-12-05 04:21 PM |
#83 |
  -
That's how they become Supermodels........ |
OneMoreDemocrat |
Feb-11-05 05:41 PM |
#28 |
 -
Interesting theory |
DS1 |
Feb-11-05 06:29 PM |
#39 |
  -
Interesting indeed... |
Misunderestimator |
Feb-11-05 07:12 PM |
#43 |
 -
Stereotype much? |
grace0418 |
Feb-12-05 09:23 AM |
#69 |
 -
it's like the old, poor taste joke +++POOR TASTE AND SEXISM ALERT*** |
northzax |
Feb-12-05 04:20 PM |
#82 |
-
Perhaps he liked the 2nd. one better.......... |
OneMoreDemocrat |
Feb-11-05 05:15 PM |
#6 |
-
Terrific point! Hahaha! |
AuntJen |
Feb-11-05 05:16 PM |
#7 |
 -
Well my real question is, why didn't he marry Camilla in the first place? |
bob_weaver |
Feb-11-05 05:30 PM |
#21 |
-
Scuttlebutt is.... |
annabanana |
Feb-11-05 06:04 PM |
#34 |
-
He should have bucked them and married Camilla. Diana would be alive now! |
bob_weaver |
Feb-11-05 11:30 PM |
#55 |
 -
Please tell me you aren't blaming him for Diana's death |
Left Is Write |
Feb-11-05 11:32 PM |
#56 |
  -
I'm blaming Diana's celebrity for Diana's death, and she would never have |
bob_weaver |
Feb-11-05 11:34 PM |
#58 |
 -
It's hardly his *fault* that Diana died. |
Left Is Write |
Feb-11-05 11:38 PM |
#60 |
 -
If Prince Charles had not married Diana...NO ONE would know WHO |
ikojo |
Feb-12-05 06:01 AM |
#67 |
-
I heard that he wasn't ready to settle down |
yvr girl |
Feb-11-05 11:32 PM |
#57 |
-
Because the first one produced the children he needed |
Lindacooks |
Feb-11-05 05:16 PM |
#8 |
 -
Camilla |
Karenina |
Feb-11-05 05:25 PM |
#17 |
  -
I see. And so it was okay to deceive Diana into a marriage |
Lindacooks |
Feb-11-05 08:00 PM |
#47 |
 -
yes Charles and Camilla are two deceitful adulterers who broke up |
barb162 |
Feb-11-05 08:05 PM |
#49 |
 -
I agree totally. |
Lindacooks |
Feb-12-05 09:50 AM |
#71 |
 -
exactly...Camilla couldn't provide him offspring... |
SuffragetteSal |
Feb-11-05 05:44 PM |
#29 |
-
Camilla has 2 children |
barb162 |
Feb-11-05 08:06 PM |
#50 |
-
Well, HE is more evenly matched, look-wise, with Camilla. |
Lex |
Feb-11-05 05:20 PM |
#10 |
-
Diana was too good for him. |
Placebo |
Feb-11-05 05:21 PM |
#11 |
-
He looks better against Cam's looks/ Ego too fragile for Di's beauty |
caligirl |
Feb-11-05 05:22 PM |
#13 |
-
Diana is more beautiful INSIDE and OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! x 1 Million |
BigBearJohn |
Feb-11-05 05:22 PM |
#14 |
-
He married Diana because she was a verifiable virgin |
NV Whino |
Feb-11-05 05:27 PM |
#18 |
-
Its none of anyone's business but his own |
Beaverhausen |
Feb-11-05 05:28 PM |
#19 |
-
A bit superficial here aren't we? |
MrSlayer |
Feb-11-05 05:29 PM |
#20 |
-
Diana was a shallow narcissist , and she wasn't that good-looking, either. |
Spider Jerusalem |
Feb-11-05 05:30 PM |
#22 |
 -
Diana was a 19-year-old kid |
LiberalEsto |
Feb-11-05 06:05 PM |
#35 |
 -
and Charles wasn't a narcissitic, not good looking pig |
CatWoman |
Feb-11-05 06:27 PM |
#38 |
-
Why does it matter? If they love each other then so what? |
liberalpragmatist |
Feb-11-05 05:32 PM |
#25 |
-
Why did John Lennon marry Yoko Ono? |
edbermac |
Feb-11-05 05:35 PM |
#26 |
-
Because no self-respecting gay man would marry him. |
beyurslf |
Feb-11-05 05:39 PM |
#27 |
 -
I believe that Prince Charles will never be King, by this Marriage |
DearAbby |
Feb-11-05 05:47 PM |
#31 |
-
He still may be King but she won't be Queen. |
catzies |
Feb-11-05 06:50 PM |
#42 |
-
Princes consort |
smedwed |
Feb-12-05 05:01 AM |
#64 |
-
Answer: He did what the Queen wanted him to. And as usual, it |
TexasSissy |
Feb-11-05 05:46 PM |
#30 |
-
Look, these people live in a fantasy world. |
mr blur |
Feb-11-05 05:59 PM |
#33 |
 -
Nothing blurred about your view |
malaise |
Feb-11-05 06:35 PM |
#40 |
-
Man alive, people can be so mean! |
grace0418 |
Feb-11-05 06:15 PM |
#37 |
 -
Diana had a beautiful soul |
CatWoman |
Feb-11-05 06:37 PM |
#41 |
-
Camilla "cares" for Charles. |
Karenina |
Feb-11-05 07:17 PM |
#44 |
 -
I believe one of her ancestors was another Windsor royal's mistress |
CatWoman |
Feb-11-05 07:25 PM |
#46 |
-
Her great grandmother was mistress of Charles' great-great grandfather |
catzies |
Feb-11-05 11:36 PM |
#59 |
-
It's still incredibly mean-spirited and shallow |
grace0418 |
Feb-12-05 09:19 AM |
#68 |
-
Screwing around with another woman's husband |
LiberalEsto |
Feb-12-05 09:45 AM |
#70 |
 -
Yeah I guess, but like I said with Clinton, |
grace0418 |
Feb-12-05 10:02 AM |
#72 |
-
it was all over the news, first person interviews and on tapes |
barb162 |
Feb-12-05 02:58 PM |
#76 |
-
Well if we're going on looks alone.... |
GloriaSmith |
Feb-11-05 08:05 PM |
#48 |
 -
LOL |
barb162 |
Feb-12-05 03:00 PM |
#78 |
-
No, no, no -- the real question is: WHO CARES? |
MrModerate |
Feb-12-05 12:03 AM |
#61 |
-
I thought you were going to ask |
Hardrada |
Feb-12-05 02:36 AM |
#62 |
-
This is all about Charles needing to marry within his species- |
RadicalMom |
Feb-12-05 05:35 AM |
#66 |
-
I wonder about the relative ages of the people who are Diana partisans |
Lydia Leftcoast |
Feb-12-05 10:12 AM |
#74 |
 -
I'm almost 53 |
LiberalEsto |
Feb-12-05 02:59 PM |
#77 |
 -
You know, interesting point. I think he should have married |
barb162 |
Feb-12-05 03:06 PM |
#79 |
-
What a ridiculously offensive question |
skygazer |
Feb-12-05 10:19 AM |
#75 |
-
Because |
benny05 |
Feb-12-05 03:49 PM |
#80 |
-
I'm not sure, but lets face facts |
RetroLounge |
Feb-12-05 04:15 PM |
#81 |