You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #142: Reptiloid aliens... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Shrikeangel Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #136
142. Reptiloid aliens...
..are also a "hypothetical" threat.

Worrying about all threats equally means that you respond to none of them effectively, as resources are invariably limited.

And it is not as though William Casey actually said these things were credible and feasible, no matter how much you try to make out of a pronoun without referent. If I could summon his ghost to tell you you're an ass and that's not what he meant, I would, but since I can't I'll just have to do it for him.

While you're off worrying about HAARP and tectonic weapons which defy everything learned about physics in the last 400 years, the people of this country are worried about terrorism and further wars. And they are going to dismiss all of those spouting these vapors and megrims as nutjobs, and they will be right to do so. And they will likewise dismiss your more reasonable opinions, which won't be right, but they will do so anyway, because that's how people are.

Why don't you produce some HARD evidence that would justify taking any of this seriously, as opposed to words put in a SecDef's mouth? If you can't, you're wasting everyone's time and hurting a cause you purport to believe in.

Congratulations on becoming the liberal equivalent of a Vince Foster conspiracy theorist. (After all, you don't know for a fact Clinton never had him murdered. So many people have said so many things about it, it CAN'T just be dismissed out of hand, can it? The matter merits serious inquiry, does it not? The reasoning is the same with HAARP and tectonic weapons. Accept the rationality of one, accept the rationality of the other.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC