You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: That's right they did call it for Bush, not Gore [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
TrueAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's right they did call it for Bush, not Gore
Then Gore, Then Bush, Then Gore, then Bush.

I beleive the writer is confuse, that was the 1996 election when the networks said the polls were closed in Florida, not 2000.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Debunk This (Bush won legally) HFishbine  Dec-20-03 11:52 AM   #0 
  - Debunk this  for_al   Dec-20-03 11:55 AM   #1 
  - Okay.  bunnyj   Dec-20-03 11:57 AM   #2 
  - Welcome to DU, for_al!  JohnLocke   Dec-20-03 11:57 AM   #3 
  - This is not a whine. It's a Bad-Ass Bellow  SpiralHawk   Dec-20-03 12:08 PM   #9 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-20-03 12:12 PM   #11 
  - Watch this..........  BEFOREATHOUGHT   Dec-20-03 12:23 PM   #16 
  - Whoa whoa whoa...  Coldgothicwoman   Dec-20-03 11:59 AM   #4 
  - That's right they did call it for Bush, not Gore  TrueAmerican   Dec-20-03 12:03 PM   #6 
  - Irreparable Harm  Bandit   Dec-20-03 12:00 PM   # 
  - I always say he won "technically"  gulliver   Dec-20-03 12:00 PM   #5 
  - Someone had told me....  coloradodem2004   Dec-20-03 12:03 PM   #7 
  - Vincent Bugliosi  RBHam   Dec-20-03 12:06 PM   #8 
     - The Nation version of his article  Narraback   Dec-20-03 12:18 PM   #13 
  - The best refutation is that  Mairead   Dec-20-03 12:08 PM   #10 
  - His numbers are off  knight_of_the_star   Dec-20-03 12:17 PM   #12 
  - Can you imagine how humiliating it must be for these Republicans?  alcuno   Dec-20-03 12:20 PM   #14 
  - Responses to the points in your post alone without reading the article...  Media_Lies_Daily   Dec-20-03 12:23 PM   #15 
  - if the supreme court...  grasswire   Dec-20-03 12:26 PM   #17 
  - Greg Palast was all over this also.  kaitykaity   Dec-20-03 12:29 PM   #18 
  - Determining voter intent  procopia   Dec-20-03 12:35 PM   #19 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC