You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #64: Many people with education and skills are not adequately [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #59
64. Many people with education and skills are not adequately
Edited on Sat Dec-20-03 05:10 PM by Cleita
compensated for these anyway, mainly women. What makes you think that being a janitor isn't a skill that requires knowledge of various chemicals and their effects on where they are used? It also requires a certain amount of strength. Do we not reward the football player for his strength? So why not the janitor?

A lot of high wage compensating jobs really don't require all that much skill and education, models and strippers for instance? Anyone who invests eight hours a day in hard work deserves a living wage. Anyone else will get compensated because of the demand for what they do, not their skills and education.

Example, back in the 1970's my husband owned a restaurant. At that time Reagan was governor in California and he cut away funding for grants that were keeping academics employed. These out of work researchers had to find other employment. My husband hired some of them. There was a time when the majority of our staff had Phd's. They got paid the going wage for restaurant workers like anyone else.

Incidentally, the one high school drop out, on our staff, Mitzi, made the most money, because she made the most tips. Why? She had big boobs and didn't mind displaying a lot of them. She had no skills nor education, but she had something that was in demand and got compensated for it. Your argument doesn't have legs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC