Reply #60: AP -

[salin]

you intentionally spun this to tie dean to star wars. Then when his camp ties his policies to clintons you seem to ignore that (even your statement above ignores it).

Here is the irony - from the article - where Edwards stands from the survey:

Edwards supported developing missile defense "to ensure that America will be protected in the event diplomacy and prevention fail." He did not explicitly reject the Bush plan. On space arms control, he wrote: "America should be a leader in keeping weapons out of space."

Lets see. Supports missle defense... (what you slammed dean on and tried to tie him to Star Wars... and shouldn't you be glad that another DUer picked up the message and started a poll on it - to create the impression that it was a reality... go and correct it on that thread... your role in that misleading item... and I will back off.) Again - land-based missle defense ala Clinton... same as Dean.

Does not explicitly rejects the Bush Plan (where Dean seemed to be a bit stronger - but I am not sure he was definitive - so to be generous we can call that similar.)

So the question - the legitimate one... is on future use of space... focus on that without the rest of the innuendo... very legit. But the way it has been pursued here... intentionally misleading.