Reply #35: i'm going to assume that loyalsister has not read up on this

[BevHarris]

Loyalsister: Read up on the issues and educate yourself.
If you have done so, you are a disruptor, because your arguments truly make no sense.

I say there are voting machine makers that produce touch screens WITH a paper trail that also provide privacy for the blind. The machines function essentially the same way as the ones you are supporting.

You ignore what I just said and say I'm insensitive to the needs of the blind, and then bring up a physical disability which requires touch screen accessibility, and I say we have manufacturers that do touch screens with paper trails -- your arguments just aren't tracking at all.

Then you are asked what you have against a paper trail, and you never answer that, just start railing away at "our catastrophic prophecies" instead of answering: What do you have against a paper trail?

Then you assert, incorrectly, that problems would have to take place at the county level.

News flash: Start by actually reading the report that got so much news coverage this week. It is 24 pages long. When you can intelligently discuss issues like remote access and tamperability, using facts and logic, people here might listen to you.

Otherwise, you're just another person with an agenda.

Bev Harris