You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #19: Hey, AP [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Hey, AP
Is there a link for any of this? Interesting, and first time I've ever heard of it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Could Clinton had won in 1992 without Perot taking 18.87% of the vote? NNN0LHI  Dec-06-03 10:23 PM   #0 
  - No. Can a web-person please start a Draft Perot 2004 website?  Eric J in MN   Dec-06-03 10:26 PM   #1 
  - Wrong. Clinton was condorcet winner vs both Perot and Bush.  AP   Dec-06-03 10:38 PM   #10 
     - Correct - stat analysis of those voting Perot showed half had Clinton #2  papau   Dec-06-03 10:45 PM   #18 
     - I remeber when Perot dropped out.......  virtualobserver   Dec-06-03 11:21 PM   #32 
     - the statistics say that but don't represent the whole story  bearfartinthewoods   Dec-07-03 06:08 AM   #44 
  - Without Perot Clinton would have been toast.  mikehiggins   Dec-06-03 10:29 PM   #2 
  - I really have to disagree  arewethereyet   Dec-06-03 10:31 PM   #3 
  - He only got 43%  Stevie D   Dec-06-03 10:33 PM   #6 
     - I didn't say he was a liberal  arewethereyet   Dec-06-03 10:45 PM   #17 
        - ?  Stevie D   Dec-06-03 11:00 PM   #27 
  - There is dissatisfaction with Bush over spending and deficits.  Eric J in MN   Dec-06-03 10:32 PM   #4 
  - Wrong. There's enough data proving Clinton would have won with Perot  AP   Dec-06-03 10:39 PM   #12 
  - Correct. Exit polling among Perot voters show 2nd choice was split even  Bucky   Dec-06-03 10:54 PM   #22 
  - Nope, all studies show Clinton would have won regardless--against  joeybee12   Dec-06-03 10:47 PM   #20 
  - Wrong. Perot took more votes from Clinton then from Bush  bowens43   Dec-06-03 10:56 PM   #26 
  - Bush would have walked to re-election.  Sean Reynolds   Dec-06-03 10:32 PM   #5 
  - Not true. The data says otherwise.  AP   Dec-06-03 10:41 PM   #14 
  - Sean Reynolds, your math is wrong..  TruthIsAll   Dec-06-03 10:42 PM   #16 
     - No, I was right.  Sean Reynolds   Dec-07-03 02:39 AM   #40 
        - My hubby voted Perot  sandnsea   Dec-07-03 03:03 AM   #42 
  - Look at the Reform Party  Stevie D   Dec-06-03 10:36 PM   #7 
  - If you mention Perot  PsN2Wind   Dec-06-03 10:41 PM   #15 
  - A better question might be  PsN2Wind   Dec-06-03 10:36 PM   #8 
  - Yes. Almost definitely. Here's why.  AP   Dec-06-03 10:37 PM   #9 
  - Hey, AP  Stevie D   Dec-06-03 10:46 PM   #19 
     - There's a political science professor at Harvard who studies the  AP   Dec-06-03 10:53 PM   #21 
        - I got yer Google right here, buddy boy. Check out post #22 in this thread  Bucky   Dec-06-03 10:56 PM   #24 
        - This might be a good place to start  AP   Dec-06-03 10:56 PM   #25 
           - Thanks, I'll look here n/t  Stevie D   Dec-06-03 11:03 PM   #28 
  - I think Clinton still would have won.  seasat   Dec-06-03 10:39 PM   #11 
  - Yes, Clinton would have won w/o a 3rd party candidate  Bucky   Dec-06-03 10:40 PM   #13 
  - Perot took more votes from Clinton then he did Bush  bowens43   Dec-06-03 10:54 PM   #23 
  - Thinking about this just this morning...honestly  Donna Zen   Dec-06-03 11:17 PM   #29 
  - It's possible that Clinton could still have won  mot78   Dec-06-03 11:18 PM   #30 
  - I dont think Perot could "survive" another  tritsofme   Dec-06-03 11:37 PM   #33 
  - Here's some data  Yupster   Dec-06-03 11:21 PM   #31 
  - I thought it was about even  dansolo   Dec-06-03 11:38 PM   #34 
  - Interesting question.  elperromagico   Dec-07-03 12:21 AM   #35 
  - What exit poll  Yupster   Dec-07-03 12:52 AM   #36 
  - My speculative numbers elper  Yupster   Dec-07-03 12:57 AM   #37 
     - Whew, that's a relief.  elperromagico   Dec-07-03 02:32 AM   #39 
  - This is the wrong question to ask.  theorist   Dec-07-03 01:16 AM   #38 
  - I'd rather see Buchanan run again...  grasswire   Dec-07-03 02:44 AM   #41 
  - Yes  FDRrocks   Dec-07-03 03:06 AM   #43 
  - Even Rush, at the time, admitted after the election that Americans  Silverhair   Dec-07-03 09:04 AM   #45 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC