burning bush
(539 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-06-03 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 12. Maybe some of theose "Family Values" might take hold? |
|
Or perhaps, when jobs get hard enough to find, or food gets difficult to afford, people might give up their "Me-First" republicanisms.
Another thing that might make you want to invest in the elder generation is the dawning realization that everday you live is another you move towards membership in that select group.
|
| -Why Do "Dean-TAX" Threads Ignore Dean's Tax Plan? |
burning bush |
Dec-06-03 01:31 AM |
#0 |
-
What plan? I see lots of political rhetoric... *nm* |
SahaleArm |
Dec-06-03 01:37 AM |
#1 |
 -
that easily can be said of any of Clark's domestic policy plans |
slinkerwink |
Dec-06-03 01:46 AM |
#2 |
  -
If Dean was running on his record you might have a case... |
SahaleArm |
Dec-06-03 01:49 AM |
#3 |
 -
Rhetoric - that's mildly amusing |
burning bush |
Dec-06-03 01:50 AM |
#4 |
-
Dean prefers to use the term 'resinstate' when discussing removing |
SahaleArm |
Dec-06-03 01:53 AM |
#6 |
-
"Removing" |
RUMMYisFROSTED |
Dec-07-03 01:20 AM |
#67 |
-
Details, details, details |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 01:50 AM |
#5 |
 -
OH yeah, Its more money, more than last week, but same as last year! |
burning bush |
Dec-06-03 02:10 AM |
#9 |
  -
No, don't you let the weasel get away with it |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 02:30 AM |
#13 |
 -
Ok, I get what your saying |
burning bush |
Dec-06-03 02:45 AM |
#15 |
 -
He can't, he's not a magician |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 03:01 AM |
#17 |
 -
I'm going to stop on this point for 2 reasons |
burning bush |
Dec-06-03 03:07 AM |
#19 |
 -
I was being sarcastic |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 03:11 AM |
#20 |
 -
Well, then all the more reason to quit this debate, eh? |
burning bush |
Dec-06-03 03:21 AM |
#22 |
 -
NO, that's personal |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 03:45 AM |
#24 |
 -
Listen, you are the one who said you practically hate the man |
burning bush |
Dec-06-03 03:59 AM |
#25 |
 -
I want a Democratic President |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 04:03 AM |
#26 |
 -
Again, Why Ignore Dean's OVERALL Tax Plan? |
burning bush |
Dec-06-03 04:48 AM |
#29 |
 -
Personal attacks, again |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 05:11 AM |
#34 |
  -
Posts all over? |
burning bush |
Dec-06-03 05:16 AM |
#35 |
 -
Three |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 05:21 AM |
#36 |
 -
Sorry, you can't hijak your own thread! |
burning bush |
Dec-06-03 05:30 AM |
#40 |
 -
Dean's "overall plan" is a lot of platitudes with nothing concrete. |
AP |
Dec-06-03 11:52 PM |
#59 |
 -
If I get a dollar an hour raise |
Yupster |
Dec-06-03 09:19 AM |
#50 |
-
And, thanks to inflation, going back to your two-year old salary is a cut |
AP |
Dec-06-03 11:54 PM |
#60 |
-
The RNC and certain posters would rather we ignore economics |
depakote_kid |
Dec-06-03 01:58 AM |
#7 |
 -
Dean's chat about taxes is as deceptive as Bush's and Republicans |
AP |
Dec-06-03 11:58 PM |
#62 |
-
Another false dichotomy Dean pushes: |
AP |
Dec-07-03 12:02 AM |
#64 |
-
Bush's "tax cut" is actually a tax increase... on our children. |
farmbo |
Dec-06-03 02:09 AM |
#8 |
 -
Ugh. I can't stand hearing that mantra -- "returning to Clinton levels." |
AP |
Dec-06-03 02:15 AM |
#10 |
 -
That's assuming our children will pony up |
depakote_kid |
Dec-06-03 02:18 AM |
#11 |
  -
Maybe some of theose "Family Values" might take hold? |
burning bush |
Dec-06-03 02:28 AM |
#12 |
 -
I have to feed them today |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 02:38 AM |
#14 |
-
There you go again.... |
depakote_kid |
Dec-06-03 02:57 AM |
#16 |
-
No, there YOU go again |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 03:05 AM |
#18 |
 -
I can't believe you are arguing it, either. |
depakote_kid |
Dec-06-03 03:17 AM |
#21 |
-
They won't magically disappear |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 03:36 AM |
#23 |
 -
Some will, some won't |
depakote_kid |
Dec-06-03 04:08 AM |
#27 |
-
I live in Oregon |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 04:46 AM |
#28 |
 -
The only thing wrong with that |
burning bush |
Dec-06-03 04:57 AM |
#31 |
  -
He can't control the states, one |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 05:10 AM |
#33 |
 -
You Act As If It Were A Stealth Program! |
burning bush |
Dec-06-03 05:25 AM |
#39 |
 -
That's not what he's said |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 05:31 AM |
#41 |
 -
Here |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 05:34 AM |
#42 |
 -
I don't understand why it's an "either - or" scenario |
burning bush |
Dec-06-03 06:05 AM |
#47 |
  -
Not what he said |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 06:21 AM |
#48 |
 -
This is like reverse Clinton |
Yupster |
Dec-06-03 09:39 AM |
#54 |
 -
We can't refund state programs without federal revenue sharing |
depakote_kid |
Dec-06-03 05:22 AM |
#37 |
-
Reformed tax code |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 05:25 AM |
#38 |
-
Actually, you have been battling two fronts! |
depakote_kid |
Dec-06-03 05:41 AM |
#44 |
-
Good points |
burning bush |
Dec-06-03 04:52 AM |
#30 |
-
I understand that |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 05:07 AM |
#32 |
-
Actually, the modest medium to lower incomes didn't get a check |
depakote_kid |
Dec-06-03 05:37 AM |
#43 |
-
This year? |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 05:43 AM |
#45 |
-
He didn't get one in 2001 either |
depakote_kid |
Dec-06-03 06:04 AM |
#46 |
-
This year |
sandnsea |
Dec-06-03 06:29 AM |
#49 |
-
But people know that their local taxes |
Yupster |
Dec-06-03 09:29 AM |
#53 |
-
If Dean's changes |
Yupster |
Dec-06-03 09:27 AM |
#52 |
-
Why doesn't Dean say in the debates that he won't reverse all of Bush's |
Eric J in MN |
Dec-06-03 09:26 AM |
#51 |
 -
Because he will reverse all of Bush tax cuts |
Hep |
Dec-06-03 09:49 AM |
#56 |
-
You see, When it comes to bashing Dean |
Hep |
Dec-06-03 09:48 AM |
#55 |
 -
That is so true! |
burning bush |
Dec-06-03 11:50 PM |
#58 |
 -
Spot on, Hep! This is absolutely true. (nt) |
dajabr |
Dec-06-03 11:54 PM |
#61 |
-
Cant See The Forest For The Trees? |
burning bush |
Dec-06-03 11:40 PM |
#57 |
 -
Well said, burning bush... |
dajabr |
Dec-06-03 11:58 PM |
#63 |
 -
Why does he call tax cutters Bush-lite? |
sandnsea |
Dec-07-03 01:11 AM |
#66 |
-
Krugman Lays Out Why Dean's Plan Is A Loser |
DrFunkenstein |
Dec-07-03 12:06 AM |
#65 |