Eloriel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-01-03 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 23. Good God! He DOES take Bush and the GOP to task - all the time |
|
"If you want (fiscal sanity) you'd better elect a Democrat because the Republicans can't handle money."
"Borrow and spend Republicans."
He talks about the debt going on our grandchildren's credit cards, and on and on.
I'll bet he doesn't give a single stump speech without driving these and other points home -- HARD.
(I wish people who wish to criticize a candidate would bother to know what the hell they're talking about before they do.)
Eloriel
|
| -"You can't fund social justice in a deficit" -- Howard Dean |
dobak |
Dec-01-03 10:46 PM |
#0 |
-
maybe you should consult lbj |
Kurt Remarque |
Dec-01-03 10:48 PM |
#1 |
 -
me or Dean? |
dobak |
Dec-01-03 10:50 PM |
#3 |
-
Deficits are bad, mmmkay? $6,925,065,499,881.34 debt outstanding already |
Wonk |
Dec-01-03 10:49 PM |
#2 |
 -
and growing rapidly |
God_bush_n_cheney |
Dec-01-03 10:52 PM |
#8 |
-
Hmmm |
Cloud |
Dec-02-03 12:59 AM |
#30 |
-
temporary deficit in times of emergency... but... |
evil_orange_cat |
Dec-01-03 10:50 PM |
#4 |
 -
40 +years of deficits now. We must be on the verge of |
BillyBunter |
Dec-01-03 10:53 PM |
#9 |
  -
It's the magnitude of deficits that matter |
WillyBrandt |
Dec-01-03 10:55 PM |
#11 |
   -
No, he isn't. It's the debt to income ratio |
BillyBunter |
Dec-01-03 11:08 PM |
#18 |
  -
But it's not merely the debt-to-GDP ratio now |
WillyBrandt |
Dec-01-03 11:11 PM |
#20 |
  -
40+ years of debt, not deficit spending... there were surpluses...CLINTON |
evil_orange_cat |
Dec-01-03 11:10 PM |
#19 |
  -
Krugman thinks so |
Eloriel |
Dec-01-03 11:11 PM |
#21 |
 -
When God passes on and names Krugman as his successor, |
BillyBunter |
Dec-01-03 11:26 PM |
#28 |
 -
Clinton managed to fund Social Justice and run a surplus |
dobak |
Dec-01-03 10:55 PM |
#10 |
-
You've got it backwards |
WillyBrandt |
Dec-01-03 10:57 PM |
#14 |
-
Good God! He DOES take Bush and the GOP to task - all the time |
Eloriel |
Dec-01-03 11:18 PM |
#23 |
-
Democrats shoud watch the deficit talk |
bluestateguy |
Dec-01-03 10:50 PM |
#5 |
-
Dean is right |
WillyBrandt |
Dec-01-03 10:51 PM |
#6 |
 -
Surpluses will only do most of what you listed if impound it. |
tritsofme |
Dec-01-03 10:59 PM |
#16 |
-
You can't fight for it if you can't fund it |
WilliamPitt |
Dec-01-03 10:52 PM |
#7 |
-
Well, Why Won't Dean Cut The Pentagon Budget? |
cryingshame |
Dec-01-03 10:56 PM |
#12 |
 -
OMG! Dean would be a bigger friend to the Pentagon than Clark? |
NewYorkerfromMass |
Dec-01-03 11:24 PM |
#26 |
 -
A plus for Clark |
idlisambar |
Dec-02-03 01:07 AM |
#31 |
-
Hi idlisambar!! |
newyawker99 |
Dec-02-03 06:51 AM |
#33 |
-
He's absolutely right |
Amerikav60 |
Dec-01-03 10:57 PM |
#13 |
-
Fiscal Prudence has a bottom line, while "Social Justice" is |
NewYorkerfromMass |
Dec-01-03 10:59 PM |
#15 |
 -
if people give Dean lemons he'll probably do something stupid with them… |
pruner |
Dec-01-03 11:01 PM |
#17 |
-
Many would chastise you for those sentiments |
bobbyboucher |
Dec-01-03 11:13 PM |
#22 |
-
You can fight for social justice with a deficit |
quaker bill |
Dec-01-03 11:19 PM |
#24 |
 -
VERY well said |
Eloriel |
Dec-01-03 11:26 PM |
#27 |
-
He is positively right |
dsc |
Dec-01-03 11:23 PM |
#25 |
-
This is the one thing I REALLY like about Dean. |
WhosNext |
Dec-01-03 11:28 PM |
#29 |
-
the quote that is usually used on the stump is... |
dean4america |
Dec-02-03 02:36 AM |
#32 |