You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: so destroying piles of CDs [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
plurality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. so destroying piles of CDs
bears no similarity to burning piles of books to you huh? What if Barnes and Noble, Borders, etc, etc decided they weren't going to sell liberal books any more and had burning parties for them (Barnes and Borders owns these books mind you), would that fly in your mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Boxer just said Clear Channel banning the Chicks was like Nazis plurality  Jul-08-03 10:14 AM   #0 
  - Duh  rock   Jul-08-03 10:17 AM   #1 
  - Where did she say this?  joeybee12   Jul-08-03 10:17 AM   #2 
  - in Commerce commitee discuss FCC issues  plurality   Jul-08-03 10:18 AM   #4 
     - Also a serious conflict of interest because  wtmusic   Jul-08-03 10:34 AM   #15 
  - sorry...that's just plain silly  stopthegop   Jul-08-03 10:17 AM   #3 
  - not when  plurality   Jul-08-03 10:19 AM   #5 
  - No  Muddleoftheroad   Jul-08-03 10:20 AM   #6 
     - so destroying piles of CDs  plurality   Jul-08-03 10:22 AM   #8 
     - If they pay for them  Muddleoftheroad   Jul-08-03 10:26 AM   #11 
        - is there a single progressive thought in your head?  plurality   Jul-08-03 10:29 AM   #13 
           - no  Terwilliger   Jul-08-03 10:51 AM   #27 
           - Not a single one  Muddleoftheroad   Jul-08-03 10:56 AM   #33 
           - where do you draw the line between public interest and private companies?  plurality   Jul-08-03 11:11 AM   #43 
           - Libera, Conservative, Middle of the Road...  TheUnionDemocrat   Jul-08-03 11:43 AM   #53 
              - this has nothing to do with market prefernces or their niche  plurality   Jul-08-03 11:59 AM   #56 
              - If  Muddleoftheroad   Jul-08-03 02:25 PM   #73 
                 - well that's about the same thing Clear Channel did  plurality   Jul-08-03 03:04 PM   #79 
                    - Not at all  Muddleoftheroad   Jul-08-03 04:17 PM   #84 
              - I disagree. Boxer is getting at the REAL source of the REAL problem  nothingshocksmeanymore   Jul-08-03 12:13 PM   #60 
     - Wow strict construction logic in action!  nothingshocksmeanymore   Jul-08-03 10:59 AM   #36 
     - Pleasure of the state  Muddleoftheroad   Jul-08-03 11:02 AM   #40 
     - Sorry but the airwaves exist in the public interest.  nothingshocksmeanymore   Jul-08-03 11:37 AM   #51 
     - Do you remember "Disco Demolition"?  TheUnionDemocrat   Jul-08-03 11:51 AM   #55 
        - There is a difference between humor and political symbolism  nothingshocksmeanymore   Jul-08-03 12:06 PM   #58 
     - Clear Channel is chartered by the government  WhoCountsTheVotes   Jul-08-03 11:18 AM   #46 
  - and let's not forget  plurality   Jul-08-03 10:25 AM   #9 
  - The problem goes back to  wtmusic   Jul-08-03 10:31 AM   #14 
  - there's a limit for private companies actions  plurality   Jul-08-03 10:36 AM   #17 
     - We should never have let CC get that far  wtmusic   Jul-08-03 10:40 AM   #21 
  - Using your argument, MSNBC's decision to fire Savage restricted his rights  Michael Daniels   Jul-08-03 10:34 AM   #16 
  - nope because his speech was made while acting on the job  plurality   Jul-08-03 10:39 AM   #20 
  - Yeah, this is the big issue here  Quahog   Jul-08-03 11:26 AM   #48 
  - Sorry, the comparison is quite valid, because the "private company,"  RichM   Jul-08-03 10:25 AM   #10 
  - When the Nazis had their book burnings  Dhalgren   Jul-08-03 12:41 PM   #64 
  - the intent was the same  Iris   Jul-08-03 10:37 AM   #18 
  - No, there is no effective difference  Jack Rabbit   Jul-08-03 11:22 AM   #47 
  - but Clear Channel operates on the publilc airwaves  northernsoul   Jul-08-03 12:48 PM   #66 
  - but the fireworks over the Rose Bowl, paid for by CC were  realFedUp   Jul-08-03 10:20 AM   #7 
  - yeah and all those choice freeper rallies  plurality   Jul-08-03 10:27 AM   #12 
     - there's a difference between restricting speech  stopthegop   Jul-08-03 10:40 AM   #22 
        - it is restricting speech  plurality   Jul-08-03 10:43 AM   #24 
        - no it's not...  stopthegop   Jul-08-03 10:45 AM   #25 
           - but they prevented people from hearing them  plurality   Jul-08-03 10:49 AM   #26 
              - no...last time...  stopthegop   Jul-08-03 10:51 AM   #28 
              - what about refusing antiwar ads while promoting pro-war rallies?  plurality   Jul-08-03 10:53 AM   #30 
                 - I wouldn't...but it's their radio station...  stopthegop   Jul-08-03 10:54 AM   #32 
                 - this isn't about a radio station  plurality   Jul-08-03 11:15 AM   #45 
                 - How about forcing  Muddleoftheroad   Jul-08-03 10:58 AM   #34 
                    - as I recall DU was forced to have a popup  plurality   Jul-08-03 11:14 AM   #44 
                    - forced to have a popup how?  stopthegop   Jul-08-03 12:44 PM   #65 
                       - but the company that owns the webspace  plurality   Jul-08-03 01:53 PM   #69 
                    - No it isn't. DU does NOT need an FCC license to operate  nothingshocksmeanymore   Jul-08-03 12:08 PM   #59 
              - also  stopthegop   Jul-08-03 10:54 AM   #31 
              - no I'm not  plurality   Jul-08-03 10:59 AM   #35 
                 - given the choice between  stopthegop   Jul-08-03 11:01 AM   #39 
              - They prevented people from hearing them? Please.....  Michael Daniels   Jul-08-03 11:32 AM   #49 
                 - they suppressed their speech  plurality   Jul-08-03 11:34 AM   #50 
                    - sorta like boycotting advertisers on Rush Limbaugh? n/t  stopthegop   Jul-08-03 12:28 PM   #61 
                       - Limbaugh is paid for his opinions  plurality   Jul-08-03 12:31 PM   #63 
                          - Wrong  Muddleoftheroad   Jul-08-03 02:32 PM   #75 
                          - but it wasn't done in a way that has anything to do  plurality   Jul-08-03 03:08 PM   #80 
                             - Since when do radio stations sign contracts to play music?  Michael Daniels   Jul-08-03 03:58 PM   #83 
                             - so if CC can theoretically not play DC for being gay  plurality   Jul-08-03 04:50 PM   #87 
                             - Contract?  Muddleoftheroad   Jul-08-03 04:21 PM   #85 
                                - they sign a contract with the label to play their music  plurality   Jul-08-03 04:52 PM   #88 
                          - More like legal corporate extortion pays for limburger cheese  nolabels   Jul-08-03 02:45 PM   #78 
        - wouldn't depend  Iris   Jul-08-03 10:53 AM   #29 
        - So if a religious school burns books about evolution that's fine?  nothingshocksmeanymore   Jul-08-03 11:01 AM   #38 
        - yes it is...  stopthegop   Jul-08-03 11:02 AM   #41 
        - Fine for them  Muddleoftheroad   Jul-08-03 11:04 AM   #42 
           - Thank you. Your posts stand as a testament against private religious  nothingshocksmeanymore   Jul-08-03 11:40 AM   #52 
        - You are missing the point, stopthegap  Jack Rabbit   Jul-08-03 12:01 PM   #57 
           - OK...that's a valid point...  stopthegop   Jul-08-03 12:29 PM   #62 
              - I agree with you on Nazi comparisons  Jack Rabbit   Jul-08-03 01:52 PM   #68 
  - Here's FDR take on it:  robbedvoter   Jul-08-03 10:38 AM   #19 
  - Incisive post, robbedvoter. You've hit the problem right between the eyes.  thebeaglehaslanded   Jul-08-03 10:43 AM   #23 
  - It was  Loonman   Jul-08-03 11:01 AM   #37 
  - the back and forth argument here  T Wolf   Jul-08-03 11:44 AM   #54 
  - Plurality  SuffragetteSal   Jul-08-03 12:50 PM   #67 
  - thanks  plurality   Jul-08-03 03:09 PM   #81 
  - someone please give me a link showing that this was a CC directive  southernfried   Jul-08-03 01:56 PM   #70 
  - Dixie Chicks axed by Clear Channel (Jacksonville Business Journal)  Jack Rabbit   Jul-08-03 02:12 PM   #71 
  - like I thought, its not a Clear Channel directive  southernfried   Jul-08-03 02:16 PM   #72 
     - Another view from Paul Krugman  Jack Rabbit   Jul-08-03 02:33 PM   #76 
  - I listened to their director  plurality   Jul-08-03 03:11 PM   #82 
  - clear channel has its fingers in LOTS of pies  seekthetruth   Jul-08-03 02:32 PM   #74 
  - creepy billboard  bring_em_home_bush   Jul-08-03 04:31 PM   #86 
  - Did the Nazis Squelch Dissent?  QERTY   Jul-08-03 02:45 PM   #77 
  - It was undersatnding that the White House directed that  AlinPA   Jul-08-03 04:53 PM   #89 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC