You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #28: NO THAT IS NOT WHAT TRIALS ARE FOR!!!!!!!!!! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #24
somebody needs to go back to civics class.

we are innocent until proven guilty...

trials are for the state to prove our guilt.

please...try and remember that.

for you to put forth the reverse is part of why this country is so fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -If Limbaugh is not arrested and charged I will never find someone guilty.. NNN0LHI  Nov-18-03 09:02 AM   #0 
  - While I would like to take that stance  wysimdnwyg   Nov-18-03 09:04 AM   #1 
  - wrong wrong the purpose of the jury system  mopinko   Nov-18-03 09:08 AM   #3 
  - Having never been on a jury  wysimdnwyg   Nov-18-03 09:13 AM   #4 
  - Jury Nullification  NNN0LHI   Nov-18-03 09:17 AM   #6 
     - Thank you  wysimdnwyg   Nov-18-03 09:21 AM   #8 
        - Drugs are not crimes n/t  TolstoyAndy   Nov-18-03 10:03 AM   #16 
  - No, it's not.  Grins   Nov-18-03 11:25 AM   #37 
  - Oooooooooohhh!!!! WRONG! WRONG!  BiggJawn   Nov-18-03 11:13 AM   #29 
  - Certainly for any drug posession or distribution case...  Jack The Tab   Nov-18-03 09:07 AM   #2 
  - how do you know that?  bearfartinthewoods   Nov-18-03 09:30 AM   #10 
  - What the fuck?!! Do you know, can you count, how many black  Solomon   Nov-18-03 10:45 AM   #22 
  - the "black underclass"???? wtf....  madddog   Nov-18-03 11:17 AM   #33 
  - i just put in a call to our local DA  bearfartinthewoods   Nov-18-03 11:43 AM   #42 
     - What a joke. What a fucking joke. A prosecutor saying he  Solomon   Nov-18-03 11:55 AM   #46 
        - how many times do i have to say this? link?  bearfartinthewoods   Nov-18-03 12:09 PM   #52 
           - My question to you is WHY WEREN'T THERE COURT APPROVED  Solomon   Nov-18-03 12:19 PM   #56 
              - good questions  bearfartinthewoods   Nov-18-03 12:40 PM   #62 
                 - True. Her taking money allows her credibility to be questioned but  Solomon   Nov-18-03 01:16 PM   #66 
  - He was caught with approx 4,000 of those pills!  Jack The Tab   Nov-18-03 11:15 AM   #30 
  - link? when was he "caught" and by whom?  bearfartinthewoods   Nov-18-03 11:37 AM   #39 
  - Here's an exact number, from just ONE 47 day period...  Jack The Tab   Nov-18-03 11:20 AM   #36 
     - again...if the police had a warrent for the wire it's a different story  bearfartinthewoods   Nov-18-03 11:50 AM   #44 
     - No warrant needed for wearing a wire  dbaker41   Nov-18-03 05:09 PM   #73 
     - Yes. The police, apparently, deliberately did not petition a judge for a  Zorra   Nov-18-03 12:02 PM   #50 
        - i am in complete agreement with everything you said  bearfartinthewoods   Nov-18-03 12:15 PM   #55 
  - Buth the narcotics are only illegal bc the Power says so n/t  TolstoyAndy   Nov-18-03 10:04 AM   #17 
  -  WhoCountsTheVotes   Nov-18-03 09:14 AM   #5 
  - The fact that Rush is not in jail  1songbird   Nov-18-03 09:20 AM   #7 
  - WHOA PEOPLE!!!! THIS IS BIGGER THAN limbaugh USED TO BE!  bearfartinthewoods   Nov-18-03 09:26 AM   #9 
  - Thats what trials are for  NNN0LHI   Nov-18-03 09:33 AM   #11 
  - Currently it would be a trial with no credible evidence...  TSElliott   Nov-18-03 09:49 AM   #14 
  - give me a frekin break!  bearfartinthewoods   Nov-18-03 10:02 AM   #15 
     - But Rush can be labelled an enemy combatant  Touchdown   Nov-18-03 11:20 AM   #35 
        - lol! if only!  bearfartinthewoods   Nov-18-03 12:13 PM   #54 
  - I agree.  DemVet   Nov-18-03 09:35 AM   #12 
  - But when the law is unjust  TolstoyAndy   Nov-18-03 10:07 AM   #18 
     - Or...?  Grins   Nov-18-03 11:40 AM   #41 
  - You've forgotten that the  FlaGranny   Nov-18-03 10:10 AM   #19 
     - do you have a link for that?  bearfartinthewoods   Nov-18-03 10:48 AM   #23 
        - The Palm Beach Post  FlaGranny   Nov-18-03 01:55 PM   #70 
        - Bearfart, are you a Florida lawyer?  dbaker41   Nov-18-03 05:15 PM   #74 
  - I guess this just proves OJ really was innocent.  Bandit   Nov-18-03 09:47 AM   #13 
  - Nice view of justice there...  Selwynn   Nov-18-03 10:15 AM   #20 
  - What do you mean?  VermontDem2004   Nov-18-03 10:19 AM   #21 
  - You guys really take the cake. This is why this country is so fucked up.  Solomon   Nov-18-03 10:51 AM   #24 
     - If it wasn't for the Enquirer article none of us would have ever even...  NNN0LHI   Nov-18-03 11:01 AM   #26 
     - NO THAT IS NOT WHAT TRIALS ARE FOR!!!!!!!!!!  bearfartinthewoods   Nov-18-03 11:09 AM   #28 
     - Yeah. You're right. I should have said "prove that the evidence  Solomon   Nov-18-03 12:02 PM   #49 
     - Still don't prosecute him?  VermontDem2004   Nov-18-03 11:19 AM   #34 
     - You need to read more. The police knew what he was doing for more  Solomon   Nov-18-03 11:47 AM   #43 
        - Hold on  VermontDem2004   Nov-18-03 11:58 AM   #47 
        - If you're poor and black they'll get a search warrant and tear your  Solomon   Nov-18-03 12:21 PM   #57 
           - The law does not that permit that  VermontDem2004   Nov-18-03 12:26 PM   #59 
              - As a criminal defense attorney I can tell you that its very easy to get  Solomon   Nov-18-03 12:32 PM   #61 
                 - Amen! watering down our rights!  bearfartinthewoods   Nov-18-03 12:50 PM   #64 
                    - You and I are on the same page Bear. I will admit I have let my anger  Solomon   Nov-18-03 01:24 PM   #67 
                       - i hear and understand  bearfartinthewoods   Nov-18-03 02:51 PM   #71 
        - for one thing, he had not been marandized and i think that is required  bearfartinthewoods   Nov-18-03 12:31 PM   #60 
           - You're right. Your miranda knowledge is faulty. Miranda doesn't  Solomon   Nov-18-03 12:41 PM   #63 
           - Prior statements ARE admissible  dbaker41   Nov-18-03 05:20 PM   #75 
     - No, it's not.  jackcgt   Nov-18-03 11:28 AM   #38 
        - You all are forgetting he admitted it. Oh I get it. Don't charge  Solomon   Nov-18-03 11:51 AM   #45 
  - I could not  beevul   Nov-18-03 10:55 AM   #25 
  - Hi beevul!!  newyawker99   Nov-18-03 11:39 AM   #40 
  - i agree but as a self-employed person of very low income...  amazona   Nov-18-03 11:07 AM   #27 
  - Join the club.  Grins   Nov-18-03 01:43 PM   #68 
  - I hope I would be able to leave my political anger outside...  Silverhair   Nov-18-03 11:15 AM   #31 
  - And Noelle Bush, too...  BiggJawn   Nov-18-03 11:16 AM   #32 
  - I don't read the Inquirer but I don't think it's that simple.  tlb   Nov-18-03 12:01 PM   #48 
  - have to disagree  buddhamama   Nov-18-03 12:04 PM   #51 
  - Keep tabs on "the investigation into Limbaugh is continuing"  Scott Lee   Nov-18-03 12:09 PM   #53 
  - I would nullify any pot case.  monobrau   Nov-18-03 12:23 PM   #58 
  - i'd be tempted to too....on general opposition to the WOD.  bearfartinthewoods   Nov-18-03 01:16 PM   #65 
  - Hell yes!  Roark   Nov-18-03 01:47 PM   #69 
  - This is about as serious an issue as there is  9215   Nov-18-03 05:02 PM   #72 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC