206. That's not getting technical...it's being 100% wrong!
Bush's claim that "material breach" of cease fire obligations by Iraq justifies use of force by the United States is unavailing. The first Gulf War was a Security Council authorized action, not a state versus state conflict; accordingly, it is for the Security Council to determine whether there has been a material breach and whether such breach requires renewed use of force...NOT GEORGE BUSH! Get it?
AWOL seems more than willing to accept the relevancy of the UN Security Council when it suits his needs...and equally willing to decry that relevancy when it doesn't.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
