You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #76: Strict Controls? Too Right [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Hammie Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-03 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #55
76. Strict Controls? Too Right
The reason alot of people panic when "gun-grabbers" start talking about discriminating between people that should own guns and those that shouldn't is that they are pretty sure the shouldn't applies to them, and the should applies to some priviledged class that will include the gun grabbers.

Face it. Something is either a right, or it isn't. If you believe that owning personal arms is a human right (I do), then you will oppose any attemt to diminish that right.

It is no different from abortion. If you believe it to be a human right, then you oppose any restrictions. How many people were up in arms over partial birth abortion. What was the problem? Nobody needs a partial birth abortion (assault weapons). It isn't like we are going to turn around tomorrow and outlaw other abortions (your duck gun). Why the panic? As "we" keep trying to assure the right when we talk about regulating guns, the slippery slope argument is pure B.S. right? No one would use the precedent of unconstitutionally outlawing one kind of medical procedure to start outlawing more and more procedures, would they? Of course not, we can depend on the good will of our masters. They will only take away your rights in this little area, and you can keep them everywhere else.

As gun owners have been warning for years, it never stops. Once you allow an encroachment, you have conceded that it isn't a right at all but a priviledge enjoyed at the whim of government.

Sorry for the rant, but that is why gun control (regulation, whatever) is a losing proposition for us, just like abortion is a looser for them. We would be better off by conceding that gun ownership is a human right protected by the constitution and defending it rather than being the party that picks and chooses which rights it will "let" people have.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC