there you go. Clinton NEVER said that he was responsible for the dot.coms. What he did say was that he allowed and SUPPORTED progression and new ways of creating jobs.
This is just the kind of thinking that keeps us stuck. I'm so sick of people like you saying that Clinton "thinks" he was responsible for the dot.coms. Clinton DID encourage new technology. He wanted computers in schools and homes, so that everyone could benefit from this growth and THIS was in one of his SOTU addresses. He ENCOURAGED growth not stagnation.
No one is saying he was perfect, but at least he allowed Americans to USE their minds and talents for growth and allow the pockets to big business to bulge.
As far as the corporate malfeasion--he went to congress 6 TIMES and the bill could never be passed for more restrictions on big corporate.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
