You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry, Gephardt must stop their "Dean bashing" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
BJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:44 AM
Original message
Kerry, Gephardt must stop their "Dean bashing"
Advertisements [?]
I'm not a "Deanper", or whatever, but I am a registered Democrat and I'm just a little tired of the tone that both Senator John Kerry's and Dick Gephardt's campaigns have taken lately. Right now, if everything falls its way, the Democratic Party could run a blind mule and beat Bush. Yet the growing nastiness and devisiveness in the rhetoric coming from Kerry and Gephardt aimed at Dean can only strenghten the Republican incumbant at the Democratic Party's expense.

Let me pass along a couple of items from The Des Moines Register.

First a letter from the October 22 edition:
Two well-seasoned Washington, D.C., insiders, John Kerry and Richard Gephardt, with their recent sharp attacks against the "new boy on the Democratic block" Howard Dean, are hoping beyond hope their "two-against-one" offensive against Dean just might do better than their individual attempts to put him down.

Dean is not the enemy, George Bush is. Stop trying to fragment the Democratic Party. Attack your enemy, not your brothers.

(-snip-)
Robert B. Sanderson

Second an editorial column by Ira Lacherin today's edition:
(-snip-)
With notable exceptions such as the late Senator Paul Wellstone of Minnesota, most Democratic office-seekers haven't energized young people by campaigning on issues they care about, such as the environment or college costs
(-snip-)
But given the choice between a headmaster on the far right and a headmaster on the near right, younger voters are likely to stay home in 2004, or cast ballots for a third-party progressive (Dennis Kucinich?), the way they voted for Ralph Nader in 2000. "If Democrats can't speak the language and address the aspirations of the young," Goldberg wrote in the American Prospect, "they can forget about retaking the White House."
Link

The Democratic Party has an historic opportunity, I beleive, to not only retake the White House but the Congress. But the distorted image of a Party at war with itself, that reactionary pundits love painting of the Democrats, can only be reinforced by the current discord amongst Kerry, Dean and Gephardt. I've read issue statements from all three candidates and find only incremental differences and shifts of emphasis between them. All three are formidable candidates and any one of them should defeat Bush in 2004. Any serious and lasting rancor caused by the current divisions between the Party's top three presidental candidates only palys into the hands of the Bush/Rove Cartel. The nation, and the world, can ill afford four more years of misrule by the junta now in control of the White House and the U.S. Congress.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC