Reply #29: Something to consider if you are on the fence.

[hiaasenrocks]

I encourage everyone to do their own research. Seek answers to the questions you may have about this case. That's the fair way to do it.

As part of the evidence, I would suggest that you take into account the fact that the Save Tookie side has relied on misinformation and deliberate obfuscation of the facts. In addition, they refuse to discuss the facts of the trial and the numerous appeals this defendant received. They have been called out on this misinformation campaign probably hundreds of times at this point, and they steadfastly refuse to address these posts. It's all here on this website for everyone to see.

Considering the above, it has to make you wonder how strong a case there is for this defendant. If it were clear cut, if there were any serious doubts to be had about this case, they wouldn't need to engage in the spinning and lying.

Just something to consider.

And I know this post only applies to people on the fence. If you are anti-DP on moral grounds, I can respect that. But nofurylike and SapphireBlue are advancing theories that call this defendant's guilt into question -- with exactly no verifiable evidence for their cause. (ex.: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=5519400&mesg_id=5521159)