You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #47: This topic is timely. FWIW, I read recently the RW had discovered wiki... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
47. This topic is timely. FWIW, I read recently the RW had discovered wiki...
and there were some serious RW efforts going on to re-write some wiki sections to comport with RW views on things. Perhaps the article is just another attempt to discredit wikipedia for the same reasons?

I think for online purposes wiki is a great source. There's info there that you couldn't find easily with google searches.

Wow! Ron Reagan is talking about this RIGHT NOW! On MSNBC! Talk about coincidence!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Snared in the Web of a Wikipedia Liar ckramer  Dec-03-05 09:55 PM   #0 
  - Serves him right: His son is a tabloid jagoff for MSRNC.  Jim Sagle   Dec-03-05 10:29 PM   #1 
  - Who is John Seigenthaler, anyway? eom  Demoiselle   Dec-03-05 10:31 PM   #2 
  - He founded the First Amendment Center.  Lars39   Dec-04-05 03:26 PM   #22 
  - By your logic, because Al Gore's son is a jagoff, Gore should be smeared  Psephos   Dec-04-05 12:15 AM   #7 
  - read about this...  rayofreason   Dec-03-05 10:39 PM   #3 
  - What would you do? What could you do?  depakid   Dec-03-05 10:46 PM   #4 
  - Yeap, the guy is a whining crybaby. n/t  stevietheman   Dec-03-05 11:20 PM   #5 
  - I would complain to a New York Times journalist, of course!  SeveneightyWhoa   Dec-04-05 12:32 AM   #11 
  - Gee, who would think an encyclopedia anyone can edit would ...  Neil Lisst   Dec-03-05 11:52 PM   #6 
  - The thing is, who actually quotes from Wikipedia or cites it as a source?  SeveneightyWhoa   Dec-04-05 12:18 AM   #8 
  - I'm glad to see someone else say that! I mean, why not Fortune  Neil Lisst   Dec-04-05 12:19 AM   #9 
  - You have to admit that the info at Wikipedia enjoys superior vetting  greyl   Dec-04-05 12:40 AM   #12 
  - No, even the National Enquirer is superior on accuracy.  Neil Lisst   Dec-04-05 01:00 AM   #13 
     - Was the definition of "vetting" incorrect?  greyl   Dec-04-05 01:12 AM   #14 
        - It's not a specific entry, but the quality of the product.  Neil Lisst   Dec-04-05 10:52 AM   #16 
           - Wikipedia is a real source...  Finder   Dec-04-05 11:13 AM   #17 
           - I can't imagine any grad program accepting Wikipedia ...  Neil Lisst   Dec-04-05 03:11 PM   #18 
           - Nor would they use DU...  Finder   Dec-04-05 03:16 PM   #19 
              - Perhaps if you had an advanced degree, you'd feel differently.  Neil Lisst   Dec-04-05 03:24 PM   #21 
                 - Sounds like you have a bone to pick...  Finder   Dec-04-05 03:34 PM   #24 
                    - sounds like you're an apologist for them  Neil Lisst   Dec-04-05 03:52 PM   #25 
                    - Not an apologist but I will defend the open source concept....  Finder   Dec-04-05 04:44 PM   #33 
                       - It relies on amateurs to edit, as I'm sure you must be aware.  Neil Lisst   Dec-04-05 05:23 PM   #34 
                          - A bit judgemental, no?  Finder   Dec-04-05 05:37 PM   #37 
                             - It's "judgmental," and being accurate isn't being judgmental.  Neil Lisst   Dec-04-05 05:45 PM   #38 
                    - keep in mind  Rich Hunt   Dec-04-05 06:15 PM   #41 
           - Key words - "Wikipedia is a source for getting leads"  MH1   Dec-04-05 03:59 PM   #26 
              - Glad you get it...  Finder   Dec-04-05 04:05 PM   #28 
              - I agree that it can be a source of leads to real sources.  Neil Lisst   Dec-04-05 04:18 PM   #29 
                 - Who uses it as a source and in what medium?  Finder   Dec-04-05 04:32 PM   #32 
                    - I'm sure it's fine for your purposes.  Neil Lisst   Dec-04-05 05:27 PM   #35 
           - as someone who has used it as a reference online  Rich Hunt   Dec-04-05 06:12 PM   #39 
           - well, fine, but...  Rich Hunt   Dec-04-05 06:27 PM   #43 
           - You provide no evidence to back up your statements?  greyl   Dec-05-05 11:26 AM   #46 
  - Frequently it's dead-on right.  igil   Dec-04-05 10:34 AM   #15 
  - It's good for a quick reference though.  ContraBass Black   Dec-04-05 08:08 PM   #45 
  - Kit Seelye's next article:  SeveneightyWhoa   Dec-04-05 12:29 AM   #10 
  - Wikipedia is a great first source  darkism   Dec-04-05 03:22 PM   #20 
  - and you wonder why a bachelor's degree doesn't mean anything  Neil Lisst   Dec-04-05 03:29 PM   #23 
     - It is a good source in research...not cites but research.  Finder   Dec-04-05 03:59 PM   #27 
     - We can agree on that.  Neil Lisst   Dec-04-05 04:19 PM   #30 
     - Actually, that's not true at all  depakid   Dec-04-05 04:22 PM   #31 
     - Actually, it's very true.  Neil Lisst   Dec-04-05 05:32 PM   #36 
        - I think the term "source" is causing a bit of misunderstanding...  Finder   Dec-04-05 06:14 PM   #40 
        - Of course you're not going to cite wiki  depakid   Dec-04-05 07:55 PM   #44 
     - IT'S FOR ONLINE REFERENCE  Rich Hunt   Dec-04-05 06:22 PM   #42 
  - This topic is timely. FWIW, I read recently the RW had discovered wiki...  Wordie   Dec-05-05 11:55 AM   #47 
     - And maybe LW attempts to rewite history?  Coastie for Truth   Dec-05-05 06:28 PM   #48 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC