You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: That study is flawed. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. That study is flawed.
First of all, it looks like the hat in the first picture is inside out. That will never work.

Secondly, if you want to prevent radio weave intrusion, you would need to paint that helmet with Defend Air.
http://www.forcefieldwireless.com/defendair.html

The tin foil helmets are actually better at preventing plasma wave interference. It's ironic, the most high-tech apparatus can be foiled, so to speak, with the most low tech apparatus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC