SCDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-17-03 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 25. The Republicans know they can't bring up Vietnam |
|
remember Bush.... actual experience in Vietnam is of no importance now...
|
| -Why I think Dean has the best chance against Bush. |
gully |
Oct-17-03 01:33 PM |
#0 |
-
How do you figure that? |
wyldwolf |
Oct-17-03 01:37 PM |
#1 |
 -
Huh, |
gully |
Oct-17-03 01:42 PM |
#3 |
-
I'm just going by your post... |
wyldwolf |
Oct-17-03 01:49 PM |
#10 |
-
there you go with |
retyred |
Oct-17-03 02:00 PM |
#28 |
-
So? Dean polled at 37% and Clark at 35 % |
gully |
Oct-17-03 02:24 PM |
#40 |
 -
You're grasping... |
wyldwolf |
Oct-17-03 02:26 PM |
#44 |
-
Oh give it up |
demdem |
Oct-17-03 02:28 PM |
#48 |
-
Polls |
TKP |
Oct-17-03 01:39 PM |
#2 |
-
Dean's Soft White Underbelly |
cryingshame |
Oct-17-03 01:42 PM |
#4 |
 -
This is funny, how many Presidents were former Generals... |
gully |
Oct-17-03 01:45 PM |
#6 |
  -
Clark has the bush look to me . |
artr2 |
Oct-17-03 01:53 PM |
# |
  -
Do NOthing Washington Insiders? |
cryingshame |
Oct-17-03 01:58 PM |
#27 |
   -
Dean claimed that AS IT HAPPENED... Big difference |
gully |
Oct-17-03 02:27 PM |
#45 |
  -
Either 10 or 11 former Generals were President |
SaintLouisBlues |
Oct-17-03 02:11 PM |
#35 |
 -
Riiiiiight. |
gully |
Oct-17-03 02:22 PM |
#38 |
  -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-17-03 06:29 PM |
#95 |
 -
Straight from my father, Clark does not = Eisenhower. As a baby |
MrsGrumpy |
Oct-17-03 03:05 PM |
#64 |
 -
Ike has no equal as a General |
SaintLouisBlues |
Oct-17-03 06:55 PM |
#99 |
 -
The person they are trying to shove down our throats |
Skwmom |
Oct-17-03 08:08 PM |
#106 |
 -
Then that should even the score. I just wanted to add a bit of |
MrsGrumpy |
Oct-17-03 08:31 PM |
#115 |
 -
Here's how you deal with the Pentagon hawks: |
BullGooseLoony |
Oct-17-03 01:50 PM |
#11 |
  -
Yeah, That's Probably How Dean WOULD Try |
cryingshame |
Oct-17-03 01:53 PM |
#19 |
 -
You have a better idea? LOL |
BullGooseLoony |
Oct-17-03 01:57 PM |
#26 |
 -
Clark hasn't even PROVEN he's a Democrat. |
stickdog |
Oct-17-03 01:52 PM |
#15 |
  -
Actually Dean Has Proven He's A Wall Street Stooge |
cryingshame |
Oct-17-03 02:03 PM |
#30 |
   -
Ooooookayyyyyyyyy |
AWD |
Oct-17-03 05:16 PM |
#79 |
  -
Dean is the status quo. |
Skwmom |
Oct-17-03 08:11 PM |
# |
 -
Okay you seem to have "dirt" on Dean but do you listen to him? |
Bandit |
Oct-17-03 01:54 PM |
#20 |
  -
A lot of what Dean says he's co-opted from other candidates. |
Skwmom |
Oct-17-03 08:14 PM |
#108 |
 -
Quite the opposite actually. Clark has taken Deans positions and made |
gully |
Oct-17-03 08:16 PM |
#109 |
 -
You contradict yourself. |
Skwmom |
Oct-17-03 08:24 PM |
#112 |
 -
True, however his supporters have clarified Clarks positions. |
gully |
Oct-17-03 08:28 PM |
#114 |
 -
Lack of Foreign Policy Experience Didn't Hurt our Last Few Presidents |
ribofunk |
Oct-17-03 02:15 PM |
#36 |
-
I think that most presidents in this century have been governors |
ozone_man |
Oct-17-03 02:48 PM |
#59 |
-
Bush's lack of foreign policy experience |
paulk |
Oct-17-03 05:52 PM |
#87 |
 -
The economy will be sucking for another 5 years I'm afraid, |
ozone_man |
Oct-17-03 07:08 PM |
#101 |
-
I don't include Lieberman as one better able than Dean to win election |
paulk |
Oct-17-03 07:47 PM |
#102 |
-
I think you're ignoring a major fact here - we've had a terrorist |
Skwmom |
Oct-17-03 07:57 PM |
#103 |
-
But your forgetting Bush let it happen, and it wouldn't have had he done |
gully |
Oct-17-03 08:11 PM |
#107 |
-
So what if Bush let it happen? It doesn't negate the fact that |
Skwmom |
Oct-17-03 08:18 PM |
#111 |
-
I don't view Dean as "weak on defense"... |
gully |
Oct-17-03 08:26 PM |
#113 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-17-03 01:45 PM |
#5 |
 -
Who are the 'many'? Clark supporters, or Bush supporters? |
gully |
Oct-17-03 01:46 PM |
#8 |
  -
I wasnt selling anything |
Bertrand |
Oct-17-03 01:51 PM |
#12 |
 -
What polls are you talking about? See the ABC poll above. |
gully |
Oct-17-03 01:53 PM |
#18 |
  -
Once again, you fail to understand basic premises |
Bertrand |
Oct-17-03 02:02 PM |
#29 |
 -
Maybe not a majority, but a plurality: |
BullGooseLoony |
Oct-17-03 01:55 PM |
#23 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-17-03 01:52 PM |
#16 |
-
what did you say besides illiterate? |
NewYorkerfromMass |
Oct-17-03 01:54 PM |
#22 |
-
I just got the Zogby Survey Today |
TNOE |
Oct-17-03 01:46 PM |
#7 |
-
No "all" the people being polled don't know the dirt on Howard. |
Skwmom |
Oct-17-03 01:48 PM |
#9 |
 -
People Don't Care |
LuminousX |
Oct-17-03 01:52 PM |
#13 |
  -
Wrong. Someone groping women doesn't affect the voter. |
Skwmom |
Oct-17-03 08:06 PM |
#105 |
 -
I see, so we have to elect a General.. |
gully |
Oct-17-03 08:17 PM |
#110 |
 -
Bush's daddy got him into the National Guard. |
BullGooseLoony |
Oct-17-03 01:52 PM |
#14 |
 -
The Republicans know they can't bring up Vietnam |
SCDem |
Oct-17-03 01:57 PM |
#25 |
 -
In all fairness |
retyred |
Oct-17-03 03:11 PM |
#69 |
-
Title is misleading... |
wyldwolf |
Oct-17-03 01:53 PM |
#17 |
 -
Well, given the fact that Deans ahead and he's got mucho supporters |
gully |
Oct-17-03 01:54 PM |
#21 |
  -
So you admit your title is misleading and based on your own... |
wyldwolf |
Oct-17-03 02:04 PM |
#31 |
   -
If you feel misled, take it up with Zogby... |
gully |
Oct-17-03 02:21 PM |
#37 |
    -
Tell us how your title corresponds to the information |
Bertrand |
Oct-17-03 02:22 PM |
#39 |
   -
I haven't run anywhere. You'll have to read my post where I said |
gully |
Oct-17-03 02:25 PM |
#42 |
   -
You didn't put your silly "HYPOTHESIS" into play until it was pointed out. |
wyldwolf |
Oct-17-03 02:28 PM |
#47 |
   -
I call it an opinion, you call it misleading, my links and hypothesis were |
gully |
Oct-17-03 02:31 PM |
#51 |
   -
You edited your subject line after you're silly spin was called! |
wyldwolf |
Oct-17-03 02:35 PM |
#55 |
    -
I edited the subject after you pointed out my error. |
gully |
Oct-17-03 03:04 PM |
#63 |
   -
your opinion stated something that was verifiably false |
Bertrand |
Oct-17-03 02:36 PM |
#56 |
   -
How can an opinion be false? |
gully |
Oct-17-03 02:58 PM |
#60 |
   -
Im not even going to bother anymore |
Bertrand |
Oct-17-03 03:10 PM |
#68 |
   -
Oh no! Your not leaving ... I'll miss your personal insults.. |
gully |
Oct-17-03 03:11 PM |
#70 |
   -
how is the title misleading? |
pruner |
Oct-17-03 06:54 PM |
#98 |
  -
You just change the subject |
Bertrand |
Oct-17-03 02:24 PM |
#41 |
 -
What question..? |
gully |
Oct-17-03 02:28 PM |
#46 |
 -
Sorry, youre right. i should have said "charge" or "point" |
Bertrand |
Oct-17-03 02:33 PM |
#53 |
 -
Changed it for you Wyldwolf... |
gully |
Oct-17-03 02:29 PM |
#49 |
 -
Your right, I stand corrected... |
gully |
Oct-17-03 03:01 PM |
#61 |
-
Clark Doing Fabulous Considering Late Entry |
Justice |
Oct-17-03 01:56 PM |
#24 |
 -
If Clark was trully fabulous, he would have at least tied Dean's 2nd QTR |
Larkspur |
Oct-17-03 02:06 PM |
#32 |
-
Look at the stats of this poll, lakespur... |
wyldwolf |
Oct-17-03 02:08 PM |
#34 |
-
Perhaps, but Deans innovation is partly my reason for supporting him |
gully |
Oct-17-03 03:02 PM |
#62 |
-
I can tell you from personal experience that I've never been polled |
Larkspur |
Oct-17-03 05:02 PM |
#74 |
-
Very interesting point.. |
gully |
Oct-17-03 05:19 PM |
#81 |
-
Way to go Zogby....Keep bush looking good!!! |
goforit |
Oct-17-03 02:06 PM |
#33 |
-
UMMM this poll is a month old |
demdem |
Oct-17-03 02:25 PM |
#43 |
 -
It's the 'latest' zogby, which is what I said...The ABC poll with Dean in |
gully |
Oct-17-03 02:30 PM |
#50 |
-
Let's give Gully a hand here... (wild applause..) |
wyldwolf |
Oct-17-03 02:32 PM |
#52 |
 -
It was quite an achievement |
sangh0 |
Oct-17-03 02:36 PM |
#57 |
  -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-17-03 02:45 PM |
#58 |
 -
SHE-I'd be glad to pull some of your noteworthy threads..but I wont |
gully |
Oct-17-03 03:08 PM |
#67 |
 -
I edited and said I stood corrected wyldwolf. |
gully |
Oct-17-03 03:06 PM |
#66 |
 -
deleted |
gully |
Oct-17-03 03:22 PM |
#71 |
-
LOL! |
sangh0 |
Oct-17-03 02:33 PM |
#54 |
 -
My point remains the same. |
gully |
Oct-17-03 03:05 PM |
#65 |
-
Bush controls the military.... |
wadestock |
Oct-17-03 03:58 PM |
#72 |
 -
Right, I think the Clark dish makes the Dean dish look elementary. |
gully |
Oct-17-03 05:14 PM |
#78 |
-
I agree |
quaker bill |
Oct-17-03 04:32 PM |
#73 |
 -
Dean's a fighter and that is why he'll be the Bush machine |
Larkspur |
Oct-17-03 06:59 PM |
#100 |
-
These magic ball threads are... |
salin |
Oct-17-03 05:03 PM |
#75 |
-
I'll give you another chance... |
familydoctor |
Oct-17-03 05:04 PM |
#76 |
 -
Your right, nothing can be proven with this or any other opinion |
gully |
Oct-17-03 05:12 PM |
#77 |
 -
Who knows? |
Hep |
Oct-17-03 05:16 PM |
#80 |
-
Bravisimo! Your right!!!! |
gully |
Oct-17-03 05:20 PM |
#82 |
-
Gather the forces.... |
onebigbadwulf |
Oct-17-03 05:29 PM |
#83 |
-
That's WTF I'm talking about! |
Hep |
Oct-17-03 05:32 PM |
#84 |
-
I don't think the DNC power brokers CARE which candidate is strongest. |
mlawson |
Oct-17-03 05:39 PM |
#85 |
 -
an interesting point |
Hep |
Oct-17-03 05:45 PM |
#86 |
  -
The funding issue is worse than that. |
hedda_foil |
Oct-17-03 06:25 PM |
#94 |
 -
I understand that, but |
Hep |
Oct-17-03 06:33 PM |
#96 |
 -
I was under the impression the DNC funded the nominee? |
gully |
Oct-17-03 05:54 PM |
#88 |
-
It's the modern version of the 'smoke filled room'. |
mlawson |
Oct-17-03 06:06 PM |
#91 |
-
I'm keeping my fingers crossed. |
Hep |
Oct-17-03 06:18 PM |
#92 |
-
I hope I'm wrong, too! |
mlawson |
Oct-17-03 06:38 PM |
#97 |
-
Name recognition and $$$ Mula.... |
gully |
Oct-17-03 08:03 PM |
#104 |
-
Where is your argument? |
poskonig |
Oct-17-03 05:56 PM |
#89 |
-
Your right, it's a lousy arguement. But I like yours... |
gully |
Oct-17-03 05:58 PM |
#90 |
-
Well, damn |
Hep |
Oct-17-03 06:19 PM |
#93 |