You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #81: They seemed to hit on Bush freaking out over the Plame leak before [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #76
81. They seemed to hit on Bush freaking out over the Plame leak before
anyone new much about any of that. They were quoted several times by other sites before the CIA asked for an investigation suggesting Bush was paranoid that an investigation could be launched. I don't have the article but I remember reading a couple of articles that quoted CHB on that. I find this significant because it seems so subtle but with profound consequences to be proved later. Only a Bush insider would have access to something like that before the media homed in on the Plame story.

I remember this because thats when I started reading Capital Hill Blue.

If I find that article I will post it.

Food for thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -I believe Capitol Hill Blue deserves a place on DU but should be Quixote1818  Nov-12-05 05:46 PM   #0 
  - I agree not LBN source be a good  wakeme2008   Nov-12-05 05:48 PM   #1 
  - I agree. I am at a loss to name any site that hasn't missed the ball  TomInTib   Nov-12-05 05:55 PM   #2 
  - I disagree  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 05:57 PM   #3 
  - I'm with ya  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Nov-12-05 06:09 PM   #7 
  - Hell that is the way I treat the NYTs these days  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:05 PM   #4 
  - Malloy was talking about Capitol Hill Blue the other night...  Rosco T.   Nov-12-05 06:08 PM   #5 
  - That says more about Malloy  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:09 PM   #6 
     - Could you fill us in on the stories they got wrong?  Quixote1818   Nov-12-05 06:14 PM   #8 
        - Better yet, why don;t you point out a time they've been right  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:16 PM   #10 
        - Who would have believed Richard Nixon was talking to the paintings?  Quixote1818   Nov-12-05 06:23 PM   #13 
           - Or wait a few more years  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:25 PM   #16 
        - Here's a piece of tripe  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:20 PM   #11 
        - Really , knowing how the drug trade works  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:24 PM   #15 
        - Oh come off it!  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:26 PM   #17 
           - No it is not, given how the WH acts  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:28 PM   #21 
              - Yes, it is  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:30 PM   #25 
                 - Your right, and they never wanted to smear Wilson either.  Quixote1818   Nov-12-05 06:37 PM   #35 
                 - "office and home calls are monitored"  mia   Nov-12-05 08:38 PM   #79 
        - Didn't this exact kind of thing happen in the Nixon Administration?  Quixote1818   Nov-12-05 06:27 PM   #18 
        - No  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:27 PM   #20 
           - Enemies lists  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:29 PM   #22 
           - Geez  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:33 PM   #27 
              - Tell that to Stalin, the Lubianka had a list of over 1 million  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:35 PM   #33 
                 - USing Stalin is as valid as using Hitler  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:38 PM   #38 
                    - You can claim whatever you want  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:40 PM   #42 
                    - Oh brother  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:46 PM   #47 
                       - Have you READ the FISA expansion allowing them  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:46 PM   #48 
                          - Oh brother  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:47 PM   #50 
                             - You have not , I see  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:48 PM   #53 
                                - Oh brother  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:49 PM   #54 
                                   - Here is your introduction  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:50 PM   #57 
                                      - Oh brother  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:50 PM   #59 
                                         - You did not even read it, did you?  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:51 PM   #61 
                                         - Oh brother  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:52 PM   #63 
                                         - I never thought I would do this, but you win... oh brother, not  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:53 PM   #66 
                                         - Oh brother  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:54 PM   #67 
                                         - dupe  Kralizec   Nov-12-05 10:04 PM   #85 
                                         - "Where art thou?"  Kralizec   Nov-12-05 10:04 PM   #84 
                    - "I claim victory in the debate."  Kralizec   Nov-12-05 10:16 PM   #87 
           - Yes, but Nixon was keeping tabs on those around him. nt  Quixote1818   Nov-12-05 06:29 PM   #24 
              - No, he wasn't  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:31 PM   #26 
                 - What's the difference? nt  Quixote1818   Nov-12-05 06:33 PM   #28 
                 - One way personalizes it  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:34 PM   #30 
                    - No we know this is unque to Nixon and most quite likely Bush  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:38 PM   #37 
                       - If you don't think the Clinton Administration kept tabs on the staffers  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:39 PM   #39 
                          - Staffers one thing, US PRIVATE citzens a whole different matter  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:43 PM   #44 
                 - By that measure, J Edgar Hoover  H2O Man   Nov-13-05 05:54 AM   #89 
        - Could you tell me..  sendero   Nov-12-05 06:40 PM   #41 
        - Having people break-in the DNC in Washington sounded silly also, didn't it  Rosco T.   Nov-12-05 06:50 PM   #58 
        - Pure unadulterated hyoped up overblown garbage  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:23 PM   #12 
        - You really do not believe Bush would have an Enemies List  wakeme2008   Nov-12-05 06:33 PM   #29 
           - 10,000 is unadulterated bullshit. It;s a LIE  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:35 PM   #32 
              - Oh come on. The most powerful person on the planet is going to have  Quixote1818   Nov-12-05 06:48 PM   #52 
                 - One of the two programs, Echelon  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:49 PM   #55 
                 - It;s beyond the pale  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:50 PM   #56 
                    - Denial ain't just a river in Egypt  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:51 PM   #60 
                    - Oh brother  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:51 PM   #62 
                       - That is all you have to say Walt? EDUCATE yousefl FISA  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:52 PM   #64 
                          - Oh brother  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:53 PM   #65 
                    - 10,000 averages out to about 1 out of every 30,000 people  Quixote1818   Nov-12-05 07:34 PM   #73 
        - The few, the proud, the maniacally paranoid  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:24 PM   #14 
           - Yuo think the Bush administration is NOT above that  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:27 PM   #19 
              - I think the Bush Adminstration doesn't give a rat's ass about Doug  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:29 PM   #23 
                 - Ok a little about myself and then you can call me paranoid, though  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:35 PM   #31 
                    - Tinfoilhat nuttery  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:37 PM   #34 
                       - Your prerogative  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:39 PM   #40 
  - Learned of that place here. Have to admit, it is fun to lurk and read  antifaschits   Nov-12-05 06:14 PM   #9 
  - Where exactly should we put CHB? Is there a fantasy thread?  kstewart33   Nov-12-05 06:38 PM   #36 
  - I agree it doesn't belong on LBN nt  Quixote1818   Nov-12-05 06:41 PM   #43 
     - Treat it the same way as any other rag, put it at the checkouts in the  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:45 PM   #45 
        - NYT, WAPO, NewsWeek, TIme, yep I agree with you  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:45 PM   #46 
           - WAPO, NEwsweek, Time are reliable  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 06:47 PM   #49 
              - No they are not, none of the US Press has really covered  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 06:47 PM   #51 
  - Looks Like The Walt And Nadine Show!  DistressedAmerican   Nov-12-05 07:00 PM   #68 
  - LOL  Quixote1818   Nov-12-05 07:09 PM   #70 
  - Nah as you can see I bowed out  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-12-05 07:12 PM   #71 
  - LOL you should see what this thread looks like  wakeme2008   Nov-12-05 07:31 PM   #72 
  - If Chimpy throws temper tantrums, then Clinton rapes women  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 07:43 PM   #75 
  - Well, this thread is a sign that DU has a healthy amount of skepticism  Quixote1818   Nov-12-05 07:05 PM   #69 
  - Let's just look at some CHB stories, shall we?  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 07:36 PM   #74 
  - 1999? Boy, you really have a bone to pick with CHB. Did they toss you?  antifaschits   Nov-12-05 08:01 PM   #77 
     - CHB, National Enquirer, the Globe, Weekly World News  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 08:21 PM   #78 
  - I think the problem with CHB is not so much that their stories are false,  Mayberry Machiavelli   Nov-12-05 07:58 PM   #76 
  - Bingo! My Beef EXACTLY!  DistressedAmerican   Nov-12-05 09:23 PM   #80 
  - They seemed to hit on Bush freaking out over the Plame leak before  Quixote1818   Nov-12-05 09:45 PM   #81 
  - How about stories like this one by CHB?  Quixote1818   Nov-12-05 09:53 PM   #82 
     - Tinfoilhat nuttery  Walt Starr   Nov-12-05 09:56 PM   #83 
        - I think this is where I first came upon Capitol Hill Blue  Quixote1818   Nov-12-05 10:14 PM   #86 
           - I don't see how this article proves your point at all. Wayne Madsen is  Mayberry Machiavelli   Nov-13-05 04:52 AM   #88 
  - This thread proves something quite deep to me  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-13-05 11:03 AM   #90 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC