You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #35: In this instance, though [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. In this instance, though
we need not go through the whole thing. Just the p.o.s. that got passed yesterday.

I'm guessing there will be at least *some* fun.

Is it possible to make the fundies spend themselves poor on this sort of thing? Or do they have an unlimited supply of money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Texas did NOT nullify all marriage Walt Starr  Nov-09-05 09:53 AM   #0 
  - Or they could just read the actual words and see that ALL marriage is now  truebrit71   Nov-09-05 09:54 AM   #1 
  - That simply won't happen  Walt Starr   Nov-09-05 09:56 AM   #2 
     - Why are some people here so unrealistic? I don't get it. Reality  xultar   Nov-09-05 10:03 AM   #9 
  - In other words,  GrpCaptMandrake   Nov-09-05 09:57 AM   #3 
  - Nope not judical activism. Come on. It is Texas. Why bother?  xultar   Nov-09-05 10:01 AM   #6 
     - Dead on as usual, Xultar.  tasteblind   Nov-09-05 10:05 AM   #11 
     - ...  xultar   Nov-09-05 10:10 AM   #19 
        - Awww...Now I'm blushing. n/t  tasteblind   Nov-09-05 10:13 AM   #22 
     - The point here is that  GrpCaptMandrake   Nov-09-05 10:07 AM   #15 
     - IT IS TEXAS! I'm surprised they even got the spelling correct!!!!  xultar   Nov-09-05 10:12 AM   #21 
     - I live here.  Bouncy Ball   Nov-09-05 10:15 AM   #26 
     - GET THE HELL OUT!!! Move to OH so we can take that state.  xultar   Nov-09-05 10:24 AM   #32 
        - Why would ANYONE want to leave Texas for Ohio?  Maddy McCall   Nov-09-05 10:48 AM   #49 
        - Houston is as gay and as black as Atlanta  orangepeel68   Nov-09-05 10:55 AM   #52 
           - OMG, I'm just posting on the web. I'm not running for office. DU is a  xultar   Nov-09-05 11:35 AM   #63 
              - yeah, and I was discussing.  orangepeel68   Nov-09-05 01:40 PM   #72 
     - Yeah...  Texasgal   Nov-09-05 10:26 AM   #36 
     - Considering the intent of the legislature is not judicial activism  Terran   Nov-09-05 11:49 AM   #68 
     - And the overwhelming support of Prop 2 among the African American  lastliberalintexas   Nov-09-05 11:47 AM   #67 
     - My partner almost convinced me to plan to leave the US,  AntiFascist   Nov-09-05 06:27 PM   #75 
  - So what. How the judge interprets won't stop challenges to the law.  Maddy McCall   Nov-09-05 09:59 AM   #4 
  - And then the court action challenging the law will be appealed  merh   Nov-09-05 10:06 AM   #13 
     - ROFLMAO!!!  Maddy McCall   Nov-09-05 10:07 AM   # 
     - That site I sent you is packed full of awesome animated gifs  merh   Nov-09-05 10:11 AM   #20 
     - Uh, no...  punpirate   Nov-09-05 10:24 AM   #33 
        - You are correct  merh   Nov-09-05 10:35 AM   #40 
        - Read this:  Maddy McCall   Nov-09-05 11:01 AM   #54 
           - As I said...  punpirate   Nov-09-05 11:22 AM   #60 
  - This is just plain language that bans state recognition of marriage  LSdemocrat   Nov-09-05 10:00 AM   #5 
  - It is poorly written  Walt Starr   Nov-09-05 10:01 AM   #7 
     - It's not ambiguous.  Maddy McCall   Nov-09-05 10:02 AM   #8 
        - Then you have to take it to court  Walt Starr   Nov-09-05 10:03 AM   #10 
        - It can be appealed all the way to the USSC.  Maddy McCall   Nov-09-05 10:06 AM   #14 
           - Not on the grounds that all marriage is nullified in Texas  Walt Starr   Nov-09-05 10:08 AM   #18 
              - The point is that the amendment DOES INDEED annul all Texas marriages  Maddy McCall   Nov-09-05 10:15 AM   #25 
              - And that argument  GrpCaptMandrake   Nov-09-05 10:18 AM   #28 
                 - The Texas constitution is so long, so thick  Bouncy Ball   Nov-09-05 10:19 AM   #29 
                    - In this instance, though  GrpCaptMandrake   Nov-09-05 10:25 AM   #35 
                       - Let 'em spend like crazy on this...  Maddy McCall   Nov-09-05 10:27 AM   #38 
                          - Precisely!  GrpCaptMandrake   Nov-09-05 10:34 AM   #39 
                             - My good liberal church already married a lesbian couple  Bouncy Ball   Nov-09-05 10:40 AM   #42 
                                - Have you called them to commiserate with them...  Maddy McCall   Nov-09-05 10:41 AM   #45 
                                - Their marriage never was recognized by the state.  Bouncy Ball   Nov-09-05 10:42 AM   #46 
                                - It requires a little militancy  GrpCaptMandrake   Nov-09-05 10:49 AM   #50 
        - of course its ambiguous -- its a no-brainer  onenote   Nov-09-05 11:02 AM   #55 
           - But the argument you want  GrpCaptMandrake   Nov-09-05 11:26 AM   #62 
              - I bet I can find 100 cases with language as "clear" as the Texas language  onenote   Nov-09-05 11:44 AM   #65 
  - so they will be legislating from the bench, eh?  karlrschneider   Nov-09-05 10:06 AM   #12 
  - That's the only way they can fix it until the next election cycle n/t  GrpCaptMandrake   Nov-09-05 10:41 AM   #43 
  - We know what the *spirit* of the law is  Dr. Death   Nov-09-05 10:07 AM   #16 
  - You are right to a point,  JDPriestly   Nov-09-05 10:07 AM   #17 
  - Exactly, well put  Dr. Death   Nov-09-05 10:13 AM   #23 
  - What he said.  Bouncy Ball   Nov-09-05 10:14 AM   #24 
  - How about saying that they voted for hate last night?  terrya   Nov-09-05 10:17 AM   #27 
  - Well, those who voted for it voted WITH the KKK.  Bouncy Ball   Nov-09-05 10:20 AM   #30 
     - I live in Texas  momisold   Nov-09-05 10:26 AM   #37 
        - Why? Why would they have looked at me like I was crazy?  Bouncy Ball   Nov-09-05 10:41 AM   #44 
        - Ummm....I live in Mississippi...  Maddy McCall   Nov-09-05 10:45 AM   #47 
        - Maddy Check your PM  Bouncy Ball   Nov-09-05 10:52 AM   #51 
        - I live in Houston. I never saw anything on the news about KKK.  momisold   Nov-09-05 12:12 PM   #69 
           - Persecution complex much?  Bouncy Ball   Nov-09-05 06:20 PM   #74 
        - Hey and how come you say things in threads but then never  Bouncy Ball   Nov-09-05 10:47 AM   #48 
        - momisold, a thread you might enjoy:  Bouncy Ball   Nov-09-05 10:57 AM   #53 
           - Hit and run poster, evidently.  Maddy McCall   Nov-09-05 11:08 AM   #56 
           - I noticed that.  Bouncy Ball   Nov-09-05 11:11 AM   #57 
              - ......  Maddy McCall   Nov-09-05 11:14 AM   #58 
              - Again I will say.  momisold   Nov-09-05 12:22 PM   #70 
                 - ...  Bouncy Ball   Nov-09-05 06:17 PM   #73 
           - momisoid is enjoying her own little reality.  terrya   Nov-09-05 06:29 PM   #77 
              - I didn't say I didn't know about the KKK connection..  momisold   Nov-10-05 08:12 AM   #78 
                 - I've seen DUers say this before:  Bouncy Ball   Nov-10-05 05:03 PM   #79 
  - You're too funny, I already sent my pregnant daughter  DUgosh   Nov-09-05 10:23 AM   #31 
  - LOL!  Maddy McCall   Nov-09-05 10:25 AM   #34 
     - Mmmmmm! Gummint cheese! n/t  GrpCaptMandrake   Nov-09-05 10:36 AM   #41 
        - Texas Nachoes for everyone! Provided to you by WIC  DUgosh   Nov-09-05 11:15 AM   #59 
           - I'll bring the chili if you'll send some rain our way.  Maddy McCall   Nov-09-05 11:22 AM   #61 
              - No rain here either. Lost two oat crops already this fall.  DUgosh   Nov-09-05 11:45 AM   #66 
                 - Hey, we also are dry as a bone here in my neck of TN  buddyhollysghost   Nov-09-05 12:27 PM   #71 
  - Ah, but you don't understand Texas republicans  lastliberalintexas   Nov-09-05 11:41 AM   #64 
  - Party pooper!  Mr_Spock   Nov-09-05 06:28 PM   #76 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC