|
Actually Texas isn't a big alimony state, but I can see a LOT of other potential problems with this.
And people get divorced alllll the time. Just let one person getting divorced read the language of this amendment and it's on like Donkey Kong.
|
| -all marriage is now illegal in Texas? because of screw-up in anti-gay |
Algorem |
Nov-08-05 11:40 PM |
#0 |
 -
Well, here's the official wording, you decide: |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-08-05 11:42 PM |
#1 |
 -
Sounds really confusing |
FreedomAngel82 |
Nov-08-05 11:43 PM |
#2 |
| -
Well first it defines marriage as one man, one woman |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-08-05 11:45 PM |
#4 |
| -
Which man and which woman? |
Jed Dilligan |
Nov-08-05 11:47 PM |
#9 |
| -
LOL. |
lizzy |
Nov-09-05 07:26 AM |
#118 |
 -
UNfortunately that couple is aWoL and Pickles |
Vincardog |
Nov-09-05 05:54 PM |
#205 |
| -
That's my first thought. I think someone should sue. |
newscott |
Nov-09-05 01:56 PM |
#198 |
| -
I see it now |
FreedomAngel82 |
Nov-08-05 11:49 PM |
#14 |
| -
You're hired! |
Lex |
Nov-09-05 12:24 AM |
#79 |
| -
LOL, I used to be a technical writer. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:26 AM |
#80 |
| -
So many laws have been screwed up because of bad statutory drafting. |
Lex |
Nov-09-05 12:28 AM |
#84 |
| -
You guys might be interested in the analysis |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:34 AM |
#86 |
| -
I just raised the same question about Ohio, in a reply below. |
bluedawg12 |
Nov-09-05 09:09 AM |
#146 |
| -
How can you prove something is wrong if it is exactly the same |
Rex |
Nov-09-05 07:19 AM |
#117 |
| -
Very good. Very good |
ComerPerro |
Nov-09-05 09:24 AM |
#165 |
| -
Isn't this the same legislature that tried to outlaw sodomy and |
izzybeans |
Nov-09-05 06:28 PM |
#209 |
| -
I'm a 3rd year law student |
northernsoul |
Nov-09-05 11:19 AM |
#192 |
| -
B for Bad Writing |
fortyfeetunder |
Nov-08-05 11:44 PM |
#3 |
| -
Basically says they're the only ones... |
cynatnite |
Nov-08-05 11:45 PM |
#5 |
| -
I realize that's what they were trying to say, but the way it's |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-08-05 11:47 PM |
#11 |
| -
It makes sense to me... |
cynatnite |
Nov-08-05 11:52 PM |
#23 |
| -
A question: |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-08-05 11:55 PM |
#27 |
| -
Yeah, you're right about that... |
cynatnite |
Nov-09-05 12:00 AM |
#41 |
| -
Your interpretation is wrong |
Walt Starr |
Nov-09-05 09:04 AM |
#140 |
| -
Just to split hairs. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 09:07 AM |
#144 |
| -
Doesn't say "between" |
Ikonoklast |
Nov-09-05 03:36 PM |
#202 |
| -
Sounds pretty simple to me |
notawol |
Nov-08-05 11:46 PM |
#8 |
| -
ROFL! |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-08-05 11:48 PM |
#12 |
| -
I'm sure they can get |
FreedomAngel82 |
Nov-08-05 11:51 PM |
#18 |
| -
Guess we won't be seeing any of THIS in the near future, then... |
mark11727 |
Nov-08-05 11:56 PM |
#31 |
| -
Camilla looks like she's smirking at Laura. |
loudsue |
Nov-09-05 12:26 AM |
#82 |
| -
Hmmm...the rich are different aren't they? n/t |
bluedawg12 |
Nov-09-05 08:57 AM |
#132 |
| -
Jeeee-zus, did Laura get into hubby's coke stash or something? |
IntravenousDemilo |
Nov-09-05 04:05 AM |
#112 |
| -
Big LOL |
Robert Cooper |
Nov-09-05 05:26 AM |
#113 |
| -
that's pretty funny stuff.i guess they think it'll go to court. |
Algorem |
Nov-08-05 11:47 PM |
#10 |
| -
Marriage is not "identical or similar to" marriage. It is marriage. |
WatchWhatISay |
Nov-08-05 11:50 PM |
#15 |
| -
But marriage that is identical to marriage is marriage. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-08-05 11:51 PM |
#20 |
| -
Identical means "the same as." |
Lex |
Nov-09-05 12:26 AM |
#81 |
| -
The self |
jbnow |
Nov-09-05 07:06 AM |
#116 |
| -
I guess so...... |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 08:07 AM |
#120 |
| -
"the horror.... the horror..." |
twominuteshate |
Nov-08-05 11:57 PM |
# |
| -
stick figures |
Bill McBlueState |
Nov-09-05 09:55 AM |
#182 |
| -
Isn't the woman one wearing a triangle dress? |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 09:57 AM |
#184 |
| -
So maybe it's supporting man-transvestite marriage. |
dean_dem |
Nov-09-05 03:48 PM |
#203 |
| -
Yes |
WatchWhatISay |
Nov-09-05 05:38 PM |
#204 |
| -
Um, the way I read it (b) cancels out (a) completely... |
truebrit71 |
Nov-08-05 11:56 PM |
#32 |
| -
Exactly how I read it. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-08-05 11:58 PM |
#39 |
| -
You are no longer married |
nadinbrzezinski |
Nov-08-05 11:57 PM |
#36 |
| -
Yeah, particularly if it's ONLY one man and one woman. |
impeachdubya |
Nov-09-05 12:20 AM |
#71 |
| -
DAMN! |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:21 AM |
#74 |
| -
MAY NOT CREATE OR RECOGNIZE ANY LEGAL STATUS IDENTICAL or similar to MARRI |
bluedawg12 |
Nov-09-05 12:50 AM |
#92 |
| -
Just read a, then b. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:53 AM |
#95 |
| -
They don't have to point back to (a), it is a given in this text. |
bluedawg12 |
Nov-09-05 08:55 AM |
#128 |
| -
How is it a given? |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 09:00 AM |
#135 |
| -
B uses the term defined in A. |
mccoyn |
Nov-09-05 11:35 AM |
#195 |
| -
B says the state can not recognize A face it there is only at most |
Vincardog |
Nov-09-05 06:05 PM |
#206 |
| -
....shittily ? Is that really a word ? I hear ya though !! |
Wise Doubter |
Nov-09-05 11:22 AM |
#193 |
| -
Yes, I made it up. You actually looked it up? |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 06:23 PM |
#207 |
| -
....shittily ? Is that really a word ? I hear ya though !! |
Wise Doubter |
Nov-09-05 11:22 AM |
#194 |
| -
Sorry, (a) is a definition |
Walt Starr |
Nov-09-05 09:05 AM |
#141 |
| -
It defines marriage in (a) and ... |
Mr_Jefferson_24 |
Nov-09-05 12:56 AM |
#96 |
| -
Or hell, all they had to do was look at the wording as it was used |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 01:01 AM |
#100 |
| -
Yes, they thought they were going after.. |
ananda |
Nov-09-05 07:05 AM |
#115 |
| -
(b) doesn't say anything about only homosexual couples, does it? |
terrya |
Nov-09-05 08:11 AM |
#123 |
| -
No. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 08:59 AM |
#134 |
| -
Only a man and woman can get married, but Texas doesn't recognize marriage |
LSdemocrat |
Nov-09-05 08:51 AM |
#125 |
| -
according to this, I'm no longer married.... |
GloriaSmith |
Nov-09-05 08:58 AM |
#133 |
| -
Part A question. |
alfredo |
Nov-09-05 09:01 AM |
#137 |
| -
Here's my new law.... |
obreaslan |
Nov-09-05 09:18 AM |
#156 |
| -
ROFL! You nailed it, thanks! |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 09:18 AM |
#157 |
| -
Actually, this only makes STRAIGHT marriage illegal, doesn't it? |
IanDB1 |
Nov-09-05 09:24 AM |
#164 |
| -
The problem is, two men can't marry in Texas in the first place. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 09:43 AM |
#173 |
| -
Reflexive Property of Equality |
Bill McBlueState |
Nov-09-05 09:51 AM |
#179 |
| -
That was great. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 09:53 AM |
#180 |
| -
hey, sometimes my math mind does something productive n/t |
Bill McBlueState |
Nov-09-05 10:06 AM |
#187 |
| -
OMG |
wryter2000 |
Nov-09-05 11:12 AM |
#191 |
| -
so they didn`t change the wording! |
madrchsod |
Nov-08-05 11:45 PM |
#6 |
| -
That's the official wording that will be adopted into the |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-08-05 11:46 PM |
#7 |
| -
only in Texas, huh? |
twominuteshate |
Nov-08-05 11:50 PM |
#17 |
| -
Well, they're shooting for having 69 constitutional amendments |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-08-05 11:54 PM |
#25 |
| -
Court challenge is immediate! |
Zan_of_Texas |
Nov-08-05 11:54 PM |
#26 |
| -
And in 2004, Dallas County voted in a Hispanic openly lesbian |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-08-05 11:57 PM |
#34 |
| -
Lesbian mayor in my tiny rural county |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Nov-09-05 12:43 AM |
#90 |
| -
no, no, no! please leave it on the books! |
NuttyFluffers |
Nov-09-05 12:52 AM |
#94 |
| -
HAHA! Tonight's been good! |
Raiden |
Nov-08-05 11:49 PM |
#13 |
| -
I don't know what state they were married in. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-08-05 11:50 PM |
#16 |
| -
Wouldn't that be great, if it undoes all marriage. I hope so...I hope |
texpatriot2004 |
Nov-08-05 11:55 PM |
#29 |
| -
Don't you love karma |
FreedomAngel82 |
Nov-08-05 11:52 PM |
#21 |
| -
Hyuck, hyuck....we Texans are a bunch of idiots. |
cat_girl25 |
Nov-08-05 11:51 PM |
#19 |
| -
Welcome to Dumbfuckistan, Y'all! |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-08-05 11:52 PM |
#22 |
| -
It maintains our image as stupid Texans, right? nm |
texpatriot2004 |
Nov-08-05 11:56 PM |
#30 |
| -
somebody should take another look at the Ohio one that passed last year |
Algorem |
Nov-09-05 12:05 AM |
#47 |
| -
How was it worded? |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:07 AM |
#50 |
| -
Article XV Section 11. Only a union between one man and one woman may be a |
Algorem |
Nov-09-05 12:14 AM |
#60 |
| -
Sounds fairly tight to me. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:16 AM |
#63 |
| -
so all they had to do is copy it down and use it there?somebody did a |
Algorem |
Nov-09-05 12:23 AM |
#77 |
| -
You know, the Rude Pundit would say they were getting off |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-08-05 11:53 PM |
#24 |
| -
But you know the real reason the republicans don't want gay marriage? |
cat_girl25 |
Nov-08-05 11:57 PM |
#35 |
| -
Personally, I think some of them DO want some of that. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:01 AM |
#42 |
| -
It really is amazing isn't it? |
FreedomAngel82 |
Nov-09-05 12:16 AM |
#64 |
| -
Wouldn't that just be perfect! |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Nov-08-05 11:55 PM |
#28 |
| -
Just saved a lot of hetero couples wanting to get divorced a LOT |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:02 AM |
#44 |
| -
Do you realize what this could do to our population? |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Nov-09-05 12:08 AM |
#51 |
| -
Hmmm, that's true. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:09 AM |
#55 |
| -
Before you know it we'll be the most populated state in the US |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Nov-09-05 12:20 AM |
#73 |
| -
Actually, this has been called |
Texas_Kat |
Nov-09-05 01:15 AM |
#102 |
| -
This might be the basis for a court challenge |
Robert Cooper |
Nov-09-05 05:30 AM |
#114 |
| -
RUH-ROH! |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 08:08 AM |
#121 |
| -
I'll ahve to go read it |
nadinbrzezinski |
Nov-08-05 11:57 PM |
#33 |
| -
Here it is. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:04 AM |
#46 |
| -
Does this mean no Texas divorces? |
Deb |
Nov-08-05 11:58 PM |
#37 |
| -
How can you get divorced if the state dissolved your marriage? |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:00 AM |
#40 |
| -
happy non aniversary? |
nadinbrzezinski |
Nov-09-05 12:02 AM |
#43 |
| -
Um, thanks? |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:03 AM |
#45 |
| -
Yep, |
nadinbrzezinski |
Nov-09-05 12:05 AM |
#48 |
| -
Sigh. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:07 AM |
#49 |
| -
RLOL |
nadinbrzezinski |
Nov-09-05 12:08 AM |
#52 |
| -
And it didn't cost either of you a dime! |
cynatnite |
Nov-09-05 12:08 AM |
#53 |
| -
oh god, whoever wrote that did not get it |
nadinbrzezinski |
Nov-09-05 12:16 AM |
#62 |
| -
yes! taken literally, it could indeed be read as a ban on divorce |
NorthernSpy |
Nov-09-05 12:09 AM |
#54 |
| -
oops -- meant to say it appears to outlaw *remarriage* after divorce |
NorthernSpy |
Nov-09-05 01:00 AM |
#98 |
| -
Marry in haste, repeal at leisure? |
No Exit |
Nov-08-05 11:58 PM |
#38 |
| -
I couldn't find this on Kos. Do you have a link? |
DeepModem Mom |
Nov-09-05 12:09 AM |
#56 |
| -
No link needed. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:11 AM |
#57 |
| -
Thanks! |
DeepModem Mom |
Nov-09-05 12:16 AM |
#65 |
| -
Can anything which leads to less Texans really be all bad ? |
Spinzonner |
Nov-09-05 12:12 AM |
#58 |
| -
Because you can't reproduce unless you're married? |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:17 AM |
#66 |
| -
Well it would discourage a fair number |
Spinzonner |
Nov-09-05 01:01 AM |
#99 |
| -
Extremely bad statutory drafting. Legal arguments will be made |
Lex |
Nov-09-05 12:12 AM |
#59 |
| -
What about current marriages? |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:18 AM |
#68 |
| -
I was focused on the "create" part of the sentence. |
Lex |
Nov-09-05 12:22 AM |
#76 |
| -
Right. People have a case here don't they? It seems that this |
texpatriot2004 |
Nov-09-05 12:18 AM |
#69 |
| -
Lord knows I don't want to help the KKK-aligned asshole |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:15 AM |
#61 |
| -
Damn, Oklahoma is pretty freaking specific, aren't they? |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:19 AM |
#70 |
| -
Oklahoma is specific, but open to challenge |
Dr. Death |
Nov-09-05 08:50 AM |
#124 |
| -
Ooo good one! |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 09:01 AM |
#138 |
| -
Benefits of being an anthropologist! |
Dr. Death |
Nov-09-05 09:31 AM |
#168 |
| -
Does anybody know yet |
FreedomAngel82 |
Nov-09-05 12:20 AM |
#72 |
| -
I don't know, but I bet you could just go to the website for the |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:21 AM |
#75 |
| -
Here: |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:23 AM |
#78 |
| -
Check out Ohio! They go above and beyond!! #@!#!! |
bluedawg12 |
Nov-09-05 09:06 AM |
#143 |
| -
Oh this is funny... |
Sgent |
Nov-09-05 12:17 AM |
#67 |
| -
You mean you cannot remarry in Texas? |
DearAbby |
Nov-09-05 12:27 AM |
#83 |
| -
Nope |
Sgent |
Nov-09-05 12:37 AM |
#87 |
| -
Yep, what he said. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:40 AM |
#88 |
| -
Here's the idiot who wrote this: |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:32 AM |
#85 |
| -
LOL, I just thought of something. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:41 AM |
#89 |
| -
Better that |
Sgent |
Nov-09-05 12:49 AM |
#91 |
| -
I tend to agree with that. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 12:51 AM |
#93 |
| -
We should alert Jon Stewart and Keith Olbermann |
lakemonster11 |
Nov-09-05 12:58 AM |
#97 |
| -
As a caller to Malloy pointed out, this is great for business owners |
ticapnews |
Nov-09-05 01:07 AM |
#101 |
| -
Here we have PROOF that homosexuality RUINS HETERO MARRIAGE! |
Nothing Without Hope |
Nov-09-05 01:16 AM |
#103 |
| -
Stupid ass homophobes. So typical. |
Hissyspit |
Nov-09-05 01:49 AM |
#104 |
| -
It's clear. |
Justice Is Comin |
Nov-09-05 02:04 AM |
#105 |
| -
ROFLMAO nm |
texpatriot2004 |
Nov-09-05 02:26 AM |
#107 |
| -
now I am not married anymore! |
fleabert |
Nov-09-05 02:07 AM |
#106 |
| -
Me either damn. n.t |
texpatriot2004 |
Nov-09-05 02:27 AM |
#108 |
| -
look on the bright side |
nadinbrzezinski |
Nov-09-05 02:28 AM |
#109 |
| -
LOL Funny nm |
texpatriot2004 |
Nov-09-05 02:29 AM |
#110 |
| -
No SHIT. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 08:10 AM |
#122 |
| -
They just officially crowned themselves all as bastards! |
calipendence |
Nov-09-05 02:30 AM |
#111 |
| -
Texas is just trying corner the singles market |
nolabels |
Nov-09-05 07:40 AM |
#119 |
| -
i am still in an ugly dazed, ranting to myself world. help me please |
seabeyond |
Nov-09-05 08:53 AM |
#126 |
| -
Ok |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 09:06 AM |
#142 |
| -
My wife and I were married in Texas, but now live |
Dr. Death |
Nov-09-05 08:53 AM |
#127 |
| -
Somebody needs to tell eHarmony |
Dr. Death |
Nov-09-05 08:55 AM |
#129 |
| -
So I suppose that these idiots really don't care |
MadHound |
Nov-09-05 08:55 AM |
#130 |
| -
Say I get married in Mississippi (as if there's a large pool of potential |
Maddy McCall |
Nov-09-05 08:56 AM |
#131 |
| -
You are correct on the first part |
Dr. Death |
Nov-09-05 09:01 AM |
#136 |
| -
Well, I married there and divorced there. |
Maddy McCall |
Nov-09-05 09:03 AM |
#139 |
| -
OK, OK, gee I have to do a *little* work between DU postings! |
Dr. Death |
Nov-09-05 09:09 AM |
#145 |
| -
Well, fatblossom! |
Maddy McCall |
Nov-09-05 09:10 AM |
#148 |
| -
I think it applies to current and future unions. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 09:13 AM |
#151 |
| -
Woohooo! I'm going to have to have a cocktail at 9:30 AM to celebrate! |
Maddy McCall |
Nov-09-05 09:17 AM |
#155 |
| -
Contact Glen Maxey in Texas. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 09:20 AM |
#160 |
| -
I'll leave the test of that law for a Texas resident. |
Maddy McCall |
Nov-09-05 09:23 AM |
#161 |
| -
Your marriage is simply no longer recognized in Texas. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 09:12 AM |
#149 |
| -
Maybe several other southern states will just plagiarize the Texas... |
Maddy McCall |
Nov-09-05 09:14 AM |
#152 |
| -
OK good, I'm still married then |
Dr. Death |
Nov-09-05 09:15 AM |
#154 |
| -
LOL |
Maddy McCall |
Nov-09-05 09:24 AM |
#163 |
| -
If you got married in Mississippi and move to a state where |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 09:10 AM |
#147 |
| -
Well that is just too cool, isn't it? |
Maddy McCall |
Nov-09-05 09:12 AM |
#150 |
| -
Now, some employer needs to cancel spousal benefits for all employees |
IanDB1 |
Nov-09-05 09:15 AM |
#153 |
| -
That really is what they deserve |
Dr. Death |
Nov-09-05 09:18 AM |
#158 |
| -
Amen...test the limits of this law. |
Maddy McCall |
Nov-09-05 09:19 AM |
#159 |
| -
Well, it would really hurt way more people than that |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 09:23 AM |
#162 |
| -
Exactly! Yes, there will be many legal wars. |
Maddy McCall |
Nov-09-05 09:25 AM |
#166 |
| -
Of course we don't really mean we want to hurt people like you |
Dr. Death |
Nov-09-05 09:34 AM |
#170 |
| -
But the millions of marriages just annuled by this law... |
Maddy McCall |
Nov-09-05 09:36 AM |
#171 |
| -
They can't just "change the wording" on a Constitutional Amendment |
IanDB1 |
Nov-09-05 09:39 AM |
#172 |
| -
Exactly. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 09:45 AM |
#174 |
| -
True, I didn't think of that |
Dr. Death |
Nov-09-05 10:03 AM |
#186 |
| -
Or every one can go to Vegas and get married. Their marriages |
Vincardog |
Nov-09-05 09:42 PM |
#210 |
| -
"But taking people's rights away is WRONG!!" |
IanDB1 |
Nov-09-05 09:33 AM |
#169 |
| -
If gay marriage is NOT SIMILAR to 1M1W, then gay marriage is LEGAL. |
Festivito |
Nov-09-05 09:28 AM |
#167 |
| -
Hmm, I'm not really sure the wording goes as far as to support that |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 09:47 AM |
#175 |
| -
True... |
Maddy McCall |
Nov-09-05 09:50 AM |
#178 |
| -
Well, to be clear: |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 09:56 AM |
#183 |
| -
Rather than superfluous, it defines what cannot be recognized. |
Festivito |
Nov-09-05 03:33 PM |
#201 |
| -
What a funny exercise in logic. |
Festivito |
Nov-09-05 03:12 PM |
#200 |
| -
Hmm, I see what you are saying now. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 06:26 PM |
#208 |
| -
Read this excellent article on the topic: A Texas-sized const'l mistake |
Maddy McCall |
Nov-09-05 09:47 AM |
#176 |
| -
Exactly. Kinda hard to get divorced when the state just dissolved your |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 09:48 AM |
#177 |
| -
LOL...they'll have to take down the old shingle and put up a new one... |
Maddy McCall |
Nov-09-05 09:53 AM |
#181 |
| -
Yep, no new ones can be CREATED. |
Bouncy Ball |
Nov-09-05 10:00 AM |
#185 |
| -
Might oughta plan it in Aruba, instead--and stay there. |
Maddy McCall |
Nov-09-05 10:22 AM |
#188 |
| -
Fastest way to end a bad law is STRICK ENFORCEMENT ! LoL ! |
EVDebs |
Nov-09-05 10:52 AM |
#189 |
| -
If the state cannot recognize marriage, |
troubleinwinter |
Nov-09-05 10:59 AM |
#190 |
| -
So it removes any legal recognition of marriage... |
drm604 |
Nov-09-05 12:31 PM |
#196 |
| -
I was thinking the same thing |
Shadoobie |
Nov-09-05 01:51 PM |
#197 |
| -
Could this mean marriage is over in Texas? |
Xenotime |
Nov-09-05 02:42 PM |
#199 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore