MadisonProgressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-08-05 08:03 AM
Response to Original message |
| 53. That just goes along with their talking points |
| -No exit polls tomorrow? Anyone else smell a rat? |
journalist3072 |
Nov-07-05 09:47 PM |
#0 |
 -
Why? They are a fairly recent thing. |
GrumpyGreg |
Nov-07-05 09:50 PM |
#1 |
 -
That's exactly my point |
journalist3072 |
Nov-07-05 09:55 PM |
#7 |
 -
They take the pulse of the voters who tell the truth. |
GrumpyGreg |
Nov-07-05 10:02 PM |
#11 |
| -
LOL! Did you really lie? |
journalist3072 |
Nov-07-05 10:07 PM |
#15 |
| -
Yep,I always lie and I'm always questioned. I have an honest |
GrumpyGreg |
Nov-07-05 10:18 PM |
#21 |
| -
face is irrelevant. |
unblock |
Nov-08-05 04:30 AM |
#43 |
| -
What's next, some of that "Bush voters failed to respond" bullshit? |
Zhade |
Nov-08-05 02:30 AM |
#40 |
| -
So why didn't you simply decline to participate? |
spooky3 |
Nov-08-05 07:30 AM |
#46 |
| -
Exit polls are a fairly recent thing? |
Boo Boo |
Nov-07-05 10:21 PM |
#23 |
| -
I think the poster was being sarcastic n/t |
...of J.Temperance |
Nov-08-05 05:06 AM |
#44 |
| -
"Recent" as in about 40 years. |
trotsky |
Nov-07-05 10:58 PM |
#31 |
| -
So I guess... |
foreigncorrespondent |
Nov-08-05 02:58 AM |
#41 |
| -
I imagine we won't be seeing many exit polls in 06 elections |
Imagevision |
Nov-08-05 07:30 AM |
#45 |
| -
And, how will we know the exit polls are honest? |
janedoe |
Nov-08-05 11:41 AM |
#58 |
| -
Yes I find that troubling... |
hang a left |
Nov-07-05 09:50 PM |
#2 |
| -
I guess nobody wanted to pay for them. |
igil |
Nov-07-05 09:52 PM |
#3 |
| -
Christ tho, why should accurate voting COST someone something? |
Skip Intro |
Nov-07-05 09:58 PM |
#9 |
| -
They're not audits...they're polls....paid for by the campaigns |
mcscajun |
Nov-08-05 07:36 AM |
#47 |
| -
So if people supposedly "lie" about them and "they have no useful value" |
lonestarnot |
Nov-08-05 07:43 AM |
#50 |
| -
Well, they must have had some value to the campaigns...and they |
mcscajun |
Nov-08-05 07:56 AM |
#51 |
| -
Like those announcements! |
lonestarnot |
Nov-08-05 07:57 AM |
#52 |
| -
We got to get a handle on that... |
kansasblue |
Nov-07-05 09:53 PM |
#4 |
| -
I don't recall |
DaveinMD |
Nov-07-05 09:54 PM |
#5 |
| -
Exactly |
journalist3072 |
Nov-07-05 09:56 PM |
#8 |
| -
I was refering to this Roanoke Poll, Kaine by 8 points |
kansasblue |
Nov-08-05 09:10 AM |
#54 |
| -
Yet the campaigns in the states mentioned declined to pay for any |
mcscajun |
Nov-08-05 07:37 AM |
#48 |
| -
many rats. no exit polls in those three states tomorrow - its blatant |
Skip Intro |
Nov-07-05 09:54 PM |
#6 |
| -
there are rarely |
DaveinMD |
Nov-07-05 09:59 PM |
#10 |
| -
Thank you |
Awsi Dooger |
Nov-07-05 10:19 PM |
#22 |
| -
The Democratic National Committee could afford to do them! |
Dancing_Dave |
Nov-07-05 10:05 PM |
#12 |
| -
If they had listened to me in 02 it would be old hat by now. |
SoCalDem |
Nov-07-05 10:21 PM |
#24 |
| -
Paper ballots NOW! Hand counts NOW!!! |
In Truth We Trust |
Nov-07-05 10:05 PM |
#13 |
| -
Impeachment NOW!!! |
Wilms |
Nov-07-05 10:13 PM |
#18 |
| -
Ban vote counting and tabulating machines NOW ! |
kster |
Nov-08-05 01:00 AM |
#37 |
| -
Some places are doing "parallel elections" and they can use volunteers |
bananas |
Nov-07-05 10:05 PM |
#14 |
| -
I think it is great. There will be no "leaks" of polls having Dems |
applegrove |
Nov-07-05 10:07 PM |
#16 |
| -
I agree as far as not having predictions during polling hours. |
Wilms |
Nov-07-05 10:16 PM |
#19 |
| -
Except that exit polls were off in places that didn't have diebold. So |
applegrove |
Nov-07-05 10:25 PM |
#26 |
| -
You wrote... |
Wilms |
Nov-07-05 10:33 PM |
#27 |
| -
People who do the stats on the diebold vote being off - assume that |
applegrove |
Nov-07-05 10:44 PM |
#28 |
| -
I really don't know what the statistitions assume. |
Wilms |
Nov-07-05 10:54 PM |
#30 |
| -
I don't think Bush won fair & square. I know he didn't win in 2000. I |
applegrove |
Nov-07-05 10:59 PM |
#32 |
| -
Then I misunderstood your previous posts. n/t |
Wilms |
Nov-07-05 11:11 PM |
#34 |
| -
I'm looking at the issue in all its complexity. I don't buy diebold but |
applegrove |
Nov-08-05 12:44 AM |
#36 |
| -
No, I do not smell a rat. |
ih8thegop |
Nov-07-05 10:12 PM |
#17 |
| -
So true and so sad. eom |
journalist3072 |
Nov-07-05 10:17 PM |
#20 |
| -
I smell a rat too. Exit polls have been used for a very long time |
texpatriot2004 |
Nov-07-05 10:23 PM |
#25 |
| -
Are optical scans diebold? |
HeeBGBz |
Nov-07-05 10:47 PM |
#29 |
| -
And AAR reported Schwarzenegger predicts an "upset victory" tomorrow. |
wildflower |
Nov-07-05 11:10 PM |
#33 |
| -
Disturbing, especially in light of the fact that all polls show him LOSING |
Pachamama |
Nov-08-05 01:30 AM |
#39 |
| -
I thought the same thing. |
wildflower |
Nov-08-05 10:13 AM |
#57 |
| -
We must get everyone out to vote and vote NO...We can't |
LaPera |
Nov-08-05 03:41 AM |
#42 |
| -
This is why we need to do our own exit polls |
SmileMaker |
Nov-08-05 12:10 AM |
#35 |
| -
Exit polls aren't done to detect fraud in this country |
tritsofme |
Nov-08-05 01:10 AM |
#38 |
| -
They're done for and by the campaigns, for the most part. |
mcscajun |
Nov-08-05 07:40 AM |
#49 |
| -
That just goes along with their talking points |
MadisonProgressive |
Nov-08-05 08:03 AM |
#53 |
| -
Yet, it is the voting mechanism that is flawed, not the exit polls./nt |
Festivito |
Nov-08-05 09:25 AM |
#55 |
| -
The Dems are COMPLICIT! No other explanation for it. |
Al-CIAda |
Nov-08-05 10:04 AM |
#56 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread